It’s CBS Sunday morning. What did you expect, a documentary?
No, just some of the basics. The piece was long enough to talk about more than one aspect.
It’s CBS Sunday morning. What did you expect, a documentary?
All I know is I'm going to continue avoiding Soylent Green. The ingredient list is fairly questionable even if it is technically environmentally friendly
But CBS Sunday Morning is all puff pieces. That's sort of their MO. If you were expecting them to cover the controversy, you were looking to the wrong news source. That's not what they do.No, just some of the basics. The piece was long enough to talk about more than one aspect.
Agreed.But CBS Sunday Morning is all puff pieces. That's sort of their MO. If you were expecting them to cover the controversy, you were looking to the wrong news source. That's not what they do.
But CBS Sunday Morning is all puff pieces. That's sort of their MO. If you were expecting them to cover the controversy, you were looking to the wrong news source. That's not what they do.
Information. Not promotion of the company's marketing scheme.It’s CBS Sunday morning. What did you expect, a documentary?
I don't have an opinion on the product other than the fact that it is another highly refined processed food being marketed to us as healthy because reasons.
The fact that they have drawn huge investment dollars means the effort to press the current fad will be longer than most. Ultimately they will move on to the next shiny thing as they always have before.
I want to try one for the novelty of it, but I don't know how "reasonable, albeit expensive facsimile of a product I enjoy" moves the needle for most people to endorse the product in any other way.
If I could eat myself I wouldn't have time for message boards.I think I'd eat myself before I'd give up meat.
Playing up on the fear of what's in food and alluding to the "if you can't recognize it, it may be dangerous scheme." I see the same garbage from the anti-GMO and natural medicine crowd.Is this supposed to mean something? Should we be concerned? Should we be less interested in meatless burgers?
.......A little depressing to see it from a professor, but it appears to be working against his field of animal science, so I'm not entirely surprised.
Is this supposed to mean something? Should we be concerned? Should we be less interested in meatless burgers?
The fake meat alternatives are advertised as wholesome, better for our health and the environment. The ingredient list shows that it is ultra-processed, so much so that it is indistinguishable from dog food. I'm sure plenty of consumers would find that interesting.Is this supposed to mean something? Should we be concerned? Should we be less interested in meatless burgers?
Premium dog food is pretty much human quality at this point isn't it?
I bought some treats for the pups. They smelled like fig newtons. The ingredient list was recognizable stuff.
Their web site said the food cannot be considered human quality because they didn't want to pay for testing, but the manufacturing process was in line with human standards.
So bring on the fake meat. Let's save a cow
Not sure if serious....?