Hollywood, stop ruining the classics!

jctisu

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2017
8,726
10,674
113
What's weird is it seems like lots of current blockbusters are way more than 2 hours.

Many of these last few Star Wars, Superhero movies et al were quite a bit longer than a classic like Jaws and had a whole bunch of forgettable scenes.

You'd think it would be the opposite to grab the attention while people have it.
Yeah it’s a strange phenomenon isn’t it? I wondered that a few months ago watching Oppenheimer.
 

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,589
74,409
113
Ankeny
Mel Brooks is 97 years old and is one of the producers. The fact we get another Mel Brooks movie in 2024 is amazing. People should be giddy!

I wish there was more progress on the Blazing Saddles musical they'd been talking about several years ago

 

BryceC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 23, 2006
26,471
19,648
113
There’s the cost but I read an article someone sent to me (I will have to dig it up) that postures a huge reason box offices have suffered too is the consumption of quick videos and stimulus like Tik Tok, reels, quick social media etc.

Our brains are re-wiring us to be more impatient and seeking out stimulus faster and in massive volume. So they are positing people are actually struggling to sit through 2-3 hour movies now unless it’s one of those can’t miss ones that everyone talks about seeing. But the article claims seeing those blockbusters are still more the fear of missing out more than anything.

Just an interesting thought some folks were studying.

My counter to this is the summer of movie pass where attendance went way up when it was cheaper.
 

jctisu

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2017
8,726
10,674
113
My counter to this is the summer of movie pass where attendance went way up when it was cheaper.
That’s not a counter, as I mentioned in my very first line “there’s the cost” because price is still very much an issue. The article offered it as another factor not the only factor. Cost, time, and their hypothesis all combined is why theater going has dropped.
 

Cyclonsin

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 4, 2020
2,388
4,943
113
36
Savannah, GA
I actually don't remember the last time I went in to see a movie. It's generally too rich for me.
And to me, the cost is only one drawback of seeing a movie in the theater. If you have a comfy couch and a decent TV/sound system, the at-home experience is just more comfortable/convenient.

I know my popcorn will be freshly made.

I can start the movie whenever I want to.

Need to use the restroom? Hit the pause button.

No obnoxious people talking during it who you can't throw popcorn at, nobody walking between you and the seat right in front of you that you have to accommodate, no group of girls who would rather take selfies than watch.
 

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
98,839
62,403
113
55
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
Movie theaters may be dwindling in popularity, but I still love the experience. We're fortunate to have a renovated B&B near us that is clean with good seats, good sound, and a parking lot that was also repaved, so that helps.

Maybe it's a bit of nostalgia, but I can't replicate the theater experience at home with the crowds, sights, sounds, etc. There are many movies I've watched in a theater that would not have hit the same at home for me.
I definitely agree, though we tend to reserve it for the can't miss movies, or movies that would just obviously be better experienced in the theater.
 

Jer

CF Founder, Creator
Feb 28, 2006
23,583
23,446
10,030
My wife and I used to go to 2-3 movies every single week for 2-3 years at Movies 12 in Ames when we were 17-20. We didn't miss a single new release all year around. It was pretty cheap back then - would have been around 1999-2001.

We have maintained our love of going to the theater but the selection with kids has dictated a lot of our options - we've never used anybody but my parents as a babysitter and they're 8 and 13. Every once in a while I'll go by myself.

On the flip side, I'm probably the number 1 consumer of content on Netflix, Shudder, and rentals on the Apple Store.

I think people have such high standards for what makes a movie great that most of the time they never go in with an open mind or try to enjoy it is for what it is. I've watched probably 200 horror flicks over the past year and while probably only 5 of them would be considered "good" with plotline, acting, SFX, etc - I've enjoyed probably another 175 of them.

That's largely how movies are nowadays and will continue to be - either franchises, reboots, or quantity over quality.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CycloneRulzzz

coolerifyoudid

Well-Known Member
Feb 8, 2013
17,323
27,042
113
KC
And to me, the cost is only one drawback of seeing a movie in the theater. If you have a comfy couch and a decent TV/sound system, the at-home experience is just more comfortable/convenient.

I know my popcorn will be freshly made.

I can start the movie whenever I want to.

Need to use the restroom? Hit the pause button.

No obnoxious people talking during it who you can't throw popcorn at, nobody walking between you and the seat right in front of you that you have to accommodate, no group of girls who would rather take selfies than watch.
I guess I'm lucky because I never experience any of that. I would probably have a different outlook if that were the case. I definitely don't enjoy going to an AMC like I used to. Their seats aren't as comfortable and they don't take care of things as well as they once did.

The B&B near my house made all the right moves when they came in and renovated the existing theater. Bigger comfortable seats that recline. Room to walk to any seat without disturbing anyone else. Assigned seating (We'll often show up 10-15 minutes after the start time to skip the previews and not have to worry about where to sit)

I think theaters could probably regain some of their clientele if they made the experience more comfortable instead of trying to maximize the seating capacity. They need to realize that their competition is now a comfy couch, a home theater system, and a boatload of other content that is readily available to their customer base.
 

CycloneRulzzz

Gameday Guru
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jul 13, 2008
53,830
79,145
113
44
Nevada, IA
My wife and I used to go to 2-3 movies every single week for 2-3 years at Movies 12 in Ames when we were 17-20. We didn't miss a single new release all year around. It was pretty cheap back then - would have been around 1999-2001.
My friend and I were same way regarding movies 12 at that time too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jer

Cyclonsin

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 4, 2020
2,388
4,943
113
36
Savannah, GA
I guess I'm lucky because I never experience any of that. I would probably have a different outlook if that were the case. I definitely don't enjoy going to an AMC like I used to. Their seats aren't as comfortable and they don't take care of things as well as they once did.

The B&B near my house made all the right moves when they came in and renovated the existing theater. Bigger comfortable seats that recline. Room to walk to any seat without disturbing anyone else. Assigned seating (We'll often show up 10-15 minutes after the start time to skip the previews and not have to worry about where to sit)

I think theaters could probably regain some of their clientele if they made the experience more comfortable instead of trying to maximize the seating capacity. They need to realize that their competition is now a comfy couch, a home theater system, and a boatload of other content that is readily available to their customer base.
The theaters I have near me all have comfy(ish) reclining seats, too. But with long legs I still have to accommodate people walking by and my couch at home is still a lot more comfortable.

Hell, I'm right by the world's tallest Imax and that sound system will knock your socks off, but it's $25 per person to see anything there. Sometimes worth it, but it's gotta be the right movie. I do still love the experience, but the only time I've ever seen the theater more than 10% full was for the Taylor Swift concert (judge away), and you can tell they need too (and are) cut costs where they can.

I could be wrong, but I think nearly every first run theater still in business has reclining seats, reservations, etc.
 

Cyinthenorth

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 29, 2013
15,907
11,984
113
36
Dubuque
I like it when they have re-releases with older movies. I know there were many movies I'd have liked to have seen in the theater, but never got the chance to see due to some reason. Hell, after my daughter was born, I probably missed about 4 years of theater-going.

It's sorta pricey, but it's relative. If you don't load up on concessions, going to a movie is about the same as a trip through a McDonalds drive-thru anymore.
That's just it. IF you don't load up on concessions. But good luck telling your 3 year old that he can't have popcorn when all the other kids in the theater are eating it. And at my local theater, a large popcorn is the cost of 2 adult movie tickets. We could probably simply watch the movie for under or around $25. But a large combo which is a large popcorn, large drink, and box of candy multiplies that number by 2.

I was always one of those shady teenagers sneaking in candy from the nearby dollar tree or dollar general. Might not be a bad idea to go back to that method.
 

coolerifyoudid

Well-Known Member
Feb 8, 2013
17,323
27,042
113
KC
That's just it. IF you don't load up on concessions. But good luck telling your 3 year old that he can't have popcorn when all the other kids in the theater are eating it. And at my local theater, a large popcorn is the cost of 2 adult movie tickets. We could probably simply watch the movie for under or around $25. But a large combo which is a large popcorn, large drink, and box of candy multiplies that number by 2.

I was always one of those shady teenagers sneaking in candy from the nearby dollar tree or dollar general. Might not be a bad idea to go back to that method.
#shadyteenagerforlife
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cyinthenorth

demoncore1031

Well-Known Member
May 18, 2008
14,558
7,712
113
Albuquerque,NM
theslaughterhouse.freeforums.net
And to me, the cost is only one drawback of seeing a movie in the theater. If you have a comfy couch and a decent TV/sound system, the at-home experience is just more comfortable/convenient.

I know my popcorn will be freshly made.

I can start the movie whenever I want to.

Need to use the restroom? Hit the pause button.

No obnoxious people talking during it who you can't throw popcorn at, nobody walking between you and the seat right in front of you that you have to accommodate, no group of girls who would rather take selfies than watch.
Solid points, but theater seats are much more comfortable nowadays, and the last couple times I went there were no people there. Me and the kids had the place to ourselves. My biggest complaint was the price. For 3 of us, for the tickets and snacks I paid probably around $110. Not worth it. I love the theater experience, but I'll stay home and watch movies with those ridiculous prices.
 

NickTheGreat

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 17, 2012
10,805
4,774
113
Central Iowa
And to me, the cost is only one drawback of seeing a movie in the theater. If you have a comfy couch and a decent TV/sound system, the at-home experience is just more comfortable/convenient.

I know my popcorn will be freshly made.

I can start the movie whenever I want to.

Need to use the restroom? Hit the pause button.

No obnoxious people talking during it who you can't throw popcorn at, nobody walking between you and the seat right in front of you that you have to accommodate, no group of girls who would rather take selfies than watch.

THIS. I've got a 9 foot screen, a couch, a really nice 5.1 surround sound system, and a high speed internet connection. I barely even have to leave my house. And that's the way I like it :jimlad:
 

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,367
55,283
113
I think people have such high standards for what makes a movie great that most of the time they never go in with an open mind or try to enjoy it is for what it is. I've watched probably 200 horror flicks over the past year and while probably only 5 of them would be considered "good" with plotline, acting, SFX, etc - I've enjoyed probably another 175 of them.

That's largely how movies are nowadays and will continue to be - either franchises, reboots, or quantity over quality.

There certainly has been a 'get a fix' for genre or franchise type of theme for movies for quite a few years now.

And I agree-- it can't be taken too seriously. The latest Indiana Jones went all out but still had some fun and genuinely heartfelt moments and critiquing it like it needed to have an impact is ignoring that Raiders, arguably one of best films ever, involved people melting because of an opened box.
 

Gonzo

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2009
26,799
31,174
113
Behind you
Solid points, but theater seats are much more comfortable nowadays, and the last couple times I went there were no people there. Me and the kids had the place to ourselves. My biggest complaint was the price. For 3 of us, for the tickets and snacks I paid probably around $110. Not worth it. I love the theater experience, but I'll stay home and watch movies with those ridiculous prices.
Holy sh*t dude. Seems awfully steep. We go to Fleur Cinema and pretty much only Fleur Cinema unless we have to go to JC, and it's nowhere near that. Granted we're not taking young kids, but yowza.
 
  • Like
Reactions: demoncore1031

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron