Gamblin…Smoke and Fire

[NorthCyd]

For 200 points and control of the board, said poster should carefully explain how one reads slander.

 

[CtownCyclone]

Well, there is one more thing. The SW at the front means it relates to a search warrant. @isufbcurt.

Grabbing phones, I'm sure...

 

[CloneLawman]

The poster is obviously no J Jonah Jameson.

EDIT: Hey look everyone! Everyone's favorite, kooky dumbass drive-by dumb emoter @criticalobserver himself has appeared to darken this thread. Take a bow, you deplorable POS.

 

[CloneLawman]

Grabbing phones, I'm sure...

Possibly, sure.


EDIT: Hey look everyone! Everyone's favorite, kooky dumbass drive-by dumb emoter @criticalobserver himself has appeared to darken this thread. Take a bow, you deplorable POS.

 

[CycloneDaddy]

My neighbor has 40 records in the Iowa Courts online database, anyone beat that?

 

[trevn]

You’ve read slander? You are good!!!

Lip reader. Obviously.

 

[67CY]

View attachment 113217

The case cannot be accessed without an enhanced security clearance specific to the file number, so there's no telling what it relates to at this point. But now we all know when to send her a bday card, so we've got that going for us.

I’m sure Randy or Hines or Murphy will be working on it

 

[I@ST1]

What if I told you I had a pile of shiny Chizik coins...

I’d buy one from you $100

 

[I@ST1]

I’m sure Randy or Hines or Murphy will be working on it

I don’t know if they really will… they don’t like to do a lot of real news breaking stories. It all comes from other outlets…

 

[CloneLawman]

 

[MyNameEhJeff]

Possibly, sure.


EDIT: Hey look everyone! Everyone's favorite, kooky dumbass drive-by dumb emoter @criticalobserver himself has appeared to darken this thread. Take a bow, you deplorable POS.

What’s your deal, man? Are you really that thin skinned? A lot of your posts you’re just nasty, for no reason.

 

[JP4CY]

What’s your deal, man? Are you really that thin skinned? A lot of your posts you’re just nasty, for no reason.

I put CO on ignore a long time ago because they're a Hawk troll.

 

[MyNameEhJeff]

I put CO on ignore a long time ago because they're a Hawk troll.

I’ve got them on ignore as well, but to call someone a deplorable POS, multiple times? That’s a bit much, IMO

 

[JP4CY]

I’ve got them on ignore as well, but to call someone a deplorable POS, multiple times? That’s a bit much, IMO

Well if you have them on ignore as well.....maybe Lawman's opinion could be valid?

 

[CloneLawman]

What’s your deal, man? Are you really that thin skinned? A lot of your posts you’re just nasty, for no reason.

Not without reason. Long long history of him doing that constantly.

And I do so enjoy the irony of you lecturing others about thin skin! I didn't call him a thug, so you should be happy.

 

[MyNameEhJeff]

Not without reason. Long long history of him doing that constantly. And I do so enjoy the irony of you lecturing others about thin skin! I didn't call him a thug, so you should be happy.

What an asinine response, to be expected by you though. Remember when I called you out on unnecessarily using the word thug and you got all sensitive again and went on a “high and mighty” rampage?

You can be nasty in more ways than one, calling someone a deplorable POS is one, and someone else a thug (when they aren’t one) is another. Smh

 

[jsb]

What an asinine response, to be expected by you though. Remember when I called you out on unnecessarily using the word thug and you got all sensitive again and went on a “high and mighty” rampage?

You can be nasty in more ways than one, calling someone a deplorable POS is one, and someone else a thug (when they aren’t one) is another. Smh

You were very thin skinned when anyone dared to question your dumb McDonald theory.

 

[3TrueFans]

Is this the Gambling thread or the Jeff gets in his feelings thread?

 

[CloneLawman]

Is this the Gambling thread or the Jeff gets in his feelings thread?

My fault. I'll not post about old carbon monoxide again.

 

[CloneLawman]

What an asinine response, to be expected by you though. Remember when I called you out on unnecessarily using the word thug and you got all sensitive again and went on a “high and mighty” rampage?

You can be nasty in more ways than one, calling someone a deplorable POS is one, and someone else a thug (when they aren’t one) is another. Smh

Just stop. Let's not take this thread down any further. You can start a poster-critiquing thread or something.