I understand why it might be a violation for interested parties to pledge/give money based on services provided while in college. However, this instance, the money is to be used for furthering his professional career. It's not a quid pro quo.
I understand why it might be a violation for interested parties to pledge/give money based on services provided while in college. However, this instance, the money is to be used for furthering his professional career. It's not a quid pro quo.
I understand why it might be a violation for interested parties to pledge/give money based on services provided while in college. However, this instance, the money is to be used for furthering his professional career. It's not a quid pro quo.
What if the funding was to be used for a former athletes daughter that was fighting cancer? Or anything NOT athletics related?
But almost impossible to police that, and it opens a big bag of worms as promises could be made behind the scenes for these kinds of things.
It would be ISU that would be breaking the rules and be accountable, not Edozie. ISU agrees to follow the rules set forth by the NCAA as a stipulation of membership. Courts would back NCAA.He's graduated and is a "regular" member of society now. No reason in hell he should be subject to any NCAA regulation. If this went to court the NCAA would get smacked down hard.
Just because I graduated from ISU doesn't make me a freaking booster. Look at all the Hawk fans that go to ISU because of the academics. They graduate and then start making trouble by publicly giving ISU grads money. A booster should be defined as having to spend at least $500 a year or something along those lines.
Alright guys, let's all get season tickets to KU basketball & then make a few payments to a couple former players. Sounds easy enough!