For Jennifer McDermed fans (WHO-TV meterologist)

Doc

This is it Morty
Aug 6, 2006
37,437
21,963
113
Denver
Re: For Jennifer McDermed fans (WHO-TV meteOrologist)

Requirements to apply are female, age range 22 - 28, very attractive. Males need not apply.

This is what it was like when I was in SoCal. Throw in a boob job to the requirements.
 

Incyte

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2007
4,956
931
83
Ed Wilson fired her for being a purple Kansas fan. Figured he'd bump farmageddon rivalry up a notch.
 

Jer

CF Founder, Creator
Feb 28, 2006
23,579
23,414
10,030
Now don't be throwing the BS card about being on a high horse here, the following is a very real response to this thread...

Am I the only one that finds this whole thread rather disgusting? Out of the 30 posts on the first page of the thread, every single post has sounded like a crude 8th grader objectifying anything that moves. Are we really still at the point where a lady can't be considered good at her job unless she has big **** and a short skirt? You do realize that most meteorological jobs these days require somebody to be smart and not just smile and read a teleprompter, right?

I guess maybe I'm the only one that watches the weather to see if I need to dress my son in a coat or shorts rather than to get a quick, creepy fix in by looking at pretty ladies. Threads like this remind me why I'm glad I don't have to raise a daughter in today's world, it's hard enough trying to raise a son with self dignity and respect for others.

Seriously though, this thread says a lot about how far we as a society still have to go to treat people equally and not because of their eye-candy-worthiness.
 

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,089
78,850
113
DSM
Now don't be throwing the BS card about being on a high horse here, the following is a very real response to this thread...

Am I the only one that finds this whole thread rather disgusting? Out of the 30 posts on the first page of the thread, every single post has sounded like a crude 8th grader objectifying anything that moves. Are we really still at the point where a lady can't be considered good at her job unless she has big **** and a short skirt? You do realize that most meteorological jobs these days require somebody to be smart and not just smile and read a teleprompter, right?

I guess maybe I'm the only one that watches the weather to see if I need to dress my son in a coat or shorts rather than to get a quick, creepy fix in by looking at pretty ladies. Threads like this remind me why I'm glad I don't have to raise a daughter in today's world, it's hard enough trying to raise a son with self dignity and respect for others.

Seriously though, this thread says a lot about how far we as a society still have to go to treat people equally and not because of their eye-candy-worthiness.

There's an app for that.
 

ISUcyclones11

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2014
3,936
2,590
113
Ankeny, IA
Ed Wilson fired her for being a purple Kansas fan. Figured he'd bump farmageddon rivalry up a notch.

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • arabian-proverb-quote-the-enemy-of-my-enemy-is-my-friend.jpg
    arabian-proverb-quote-the-enemy-of-my-enemy-is-my-friend.jpg
    104.3 KB · Views: 830

KnappShack

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2008
23,750
32,040
113
Parts Unknown
Now don't be throwing the BS card about being on a high horse here, the following is a very real response to this thread...

Am I the only one that finds this whole thread rather disgusting? Out of the 30 posts on the first page of the thread, every single post has sounded like a crude 8th grader objectifying anything that moves. Are we really still at the point where a lady can't be considered good at her job unless she has big **** and a short skirt? You do realize that most meteorological jobs these days require somebody to be smart and not just smile and read a teleprompter, right?

I guess maybe I'm the only one that watches the weather to see if I need to dress my son in a coat or shorts rather than to get a quick, creepy fix in by looking at pretty ladies. Threads like this remind me why I'm glad I don't have to raise a daughter in today's world, it's hard enough trying to raise a son with self dignity and respect for others.

Seriously though, this thread says a lot about how far we as a society still have to go to treat people equally and not because of their eye-candy-worthiness.

She looks like a child in her pic too

Congrats to the young woman for working her way up to a mid-sized market! Well done and good luck
 

Clark

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2009
18,345
4,589
113
Altoona
Now don't be throwing the BS card about being on a high horse here, the following is a very real response to this thread...

Am I the only one that finds this whole thread rather disgusting? Out of the 30 posts on the first page of the thread, every single post has sounded like a crude 8th grader objectifying anything that moves. Are we really still at the point where a lady can't be considered good at her job unless she has big **** and a short skirt? You do realize that most meteorological jobs these days require somebody to be smart and not just smile and read a teleprompter, right?

I guess maybe I'm the only one that watches the weather to see if I need to dress my son in a coat or shorts rather than to get a quick, creepy fix in by looking at pretty ladies. Threads like this remind me why I'm glad I don't have to raise a daughter in today's world, it's hard enough trying to raise a son with self dignity and respect for others.

Seriously though, this thread says a lot about how far we as a society still have to go to treat people equally and not because of their eye-candy-worthiness.

You do understand that being in front of a tv for a living requires more than just being smart or talented, right? It requires people wanting to watch you do whatever it is that you're doing. That goes for both men and women.

Just in the des moines market alone, can you name me one ugly/super overweight person?
 

NorthCyd

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 22, 2011
20,939
35,232
113
Now don't be throwing the BS card about being on a high horse here, the following is a very real response to this thread...

Am I the only one that finds this whole thread rather disgusting? Out of the 30 posts on the first page of the thread, every single post has sounded like a crude 8th grader objectifying anything that moves. Are we really still at the point where a lady can't be considered good at her job unless she has big **** and a short skirt? You do realize that most meteorological jobs these days require somebody to be smart and not just smile and read a teleprompter, right?

I guess maybe I'm the only one that watches the weather to see if I need to dress my son in a coat or shorts rather than to get a quick, creepy fix in by looking at pretty ladies. Threads like this remind me why I'm glad I don't have to raise a daughter in today's world, it's hard enough trying to raise a son with self dignity and respect for others.

Seriously though, this thread says a lot about how far we as a society still have to go to treat people equally and not because of their eye-candy-worthiness.

BS card played...definitely on your high horse. Some of the comments boarder on creepy, but just talking about how good looking someone on TV is not. Sex sells and TV takes advantage of it. There is a reason they spend an hour in the makeup chair before they go on TV. Maybe you have a problem with society in general and how women are objectified in it, and that's valid, but newscasts aren't doing anything but perpetuating the problem. Maybe you should stop watching and supporting newscasts in the morning if you have a real problem with it.
 

cstrunk

Well-Known Member
Mar 21, 2006
14,449
4,845
113
38
Longview, TX
Now don't be throwing the BS card about being on a high horse here, the following is a very real response to this thread...

Am I the only one that finds this whole thread rather disgusting? Out of the 30 posts on the first page of the thread, every single post has sounded like a crude 8th grader objectifying anything that moves. Are we really still at the point where a lady can't be considered good at her job unless she has big **** and a short skirt? You do realize that most meteorological jobs these days require somebody to be smart and not just smile and read a teleprompter, right?

I guess maybe I'm the only one that watches the weather to see if I need to dress my son in a coat or shorts rather than to get a quick, creepy fix in by looking at pretty ladies. Threads like this remind me why I'm glad I don't have to raise a daughter in today's world, it's hard enough trying to raise a son with self dignity and respect for others.

Seriously though, this thread says a lot about how far we as a society still have to go to treat people equally and not because of their eye-candy-worthiness.

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • internet-serious-business-cat.jpg
    internet-serious-business-cat.jpg
    24 KB · Views: 796

Jer

CF Founder, Creator
Feb 28, 2006
23,579
23,414
10,030
She looks like a child in her pic too

Congrats to the young woman for working her way up to a mid-sized market! Well done and good luck

Well put.

You do understand that being in front of a tv for a living requires more than just being smart or talented, right? It requires people wanting to watch you do whatever it is that you're doing. That goes for both men and women.

Just in the des moines market alone, can you name me one ugly/super overweight person?

Steve Deace is as ugly as they come, but obviously he's not on TV much anymore. I would argue that most of the men seem to be lower on the "1 to 10" scale in comparison to the females. Goes to show that women probably aren't as wrapped up in having to be sexually aroused every time they turn the channel.

BS card played...definitely on your high horse. Some of the comments boarder on creepy, but just talking about how good looking someone on TV is not. Sex sells and TV takes advantage of it. There is a reason they spend an hour in the makeup chair before they go on TV. Maybe you have a problem with society in general and how women are objectified in it, and that's valid, but newscasts aren't doing anything but perpetuating the problem. Maybe you should stop watching and supporting newscasts in the morning if you have a real problem with it.

Fair enough. I do have a general feeling of disgust with the overall objectification and unfair treatment of women, which only seems to be growing rather than slowing. I completely agree that sex sells and tv does play a very large part in the overall problem, which is probably one of a million reasons why I don't waste time watching the news unless there is a major world event or pending storm. Otherwise, I get the same information much quicker and more reliably online without the hassle.
 

JohnnyFive

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2012
5,159
2,522
113

Clark

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2009
18,345
4,589
113
Altoona
Well put.



Steve Deace is as ugly as they come, but obviously he's not on TV much anymore. I would argue that most of the men seem to be lower on the "1 to 10" scale in comparison to the females. Goes to show that women probably aren't as wrapped up in having to be sexually aroused every time they turn the channel.



Fair enough. I do have a general feeling of disgust with the overall objectification and unfair treatment of women, which only seems to be growing rather than slowing. I completely agree that sex sells and tv does play a very large part in the overall problem, which is probably one of a million reasons why I don't waste time watching the news unless there is a major world event or pending storm. Otherwise, I get the same information much quicker and more reliably online without the hassle.

the one guy you came up with doesn't even do tv and never has unless you consider that little mediacom thing he did with Jon Miller tv. Thanks for making my point.
 

NorthCyd

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 22, 2011
20,939
35,232
113
the one guy you came up with doesn't even do tv and never has unless you consider that little mediacom thing he did with Jon Miller tv. Thanks for making my point.

He does do a lot of radio, though. Hence the saying he has a face for radio.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron