Fauci and the near future of sporting contests

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
98,831
62,395
113
55
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
The country that's currently at a 10% death rate for confirmed cases?

We don't know if states have gone overboard....also how do you have some states able to do something like college athletics if others can't? Too bad, so sad?

They are almost certain to have far more unconfirmed cases (as a percentage of population) than other countries that are forcibly isolating, and there's no logical reason to assume that they will end with a higher death rate than other countries, since their hospitals have not been overwhelmed.

You make a good point about athletics though. It's going to be hard to open without certain regions, and some of the process of opening up is going to be based on regional perceptions of risk.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,768
66,167
113
LA LA Land
I think some states have gone way overboard (some have not). I guess it depends on how quickly they lift a lot of the restrictions. I'm also curious how Sweden ends up, as they've left almost everything to voluntary cooperation, and their stats are very similar to the experience of everyone else.

I'm going to frame this post on my wall of Pride wanting to copy the Swedish government. ;-)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cyclonepride

cycloneG

Well-Known Member
Mar 7, 2007
15,980
16,617
113
Off the grid
They are almost certain to have far more unconfirmed cases (as a percentage of population) than other countries that are forcibly isolating, and there's no logical reason to assume that they will end with a higher death rate than other countries, since their hospitals have not been overwhelmed.

You make a good point about athletics though. It's going to be hard to open without certain regions, and some of the process of opening up is going to be based on regional perceptions of risk.

Again, you're assuming nothing changes over the next few months. Simply allowing your populace to die because you think it's going to happen anyway is psychotic.
 

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,323
55,226
113
They are almost certain to have far more unconfirmed cases (as a percentage of population) than other countries that are forcibly isolating, and there's no logical reason to assume that they will end with a higher death rate than other countries, since their hospitals have not been overwhelmed.

You make a good point about athletics though. It's going to be hard to open without certain regions, and some of the process of opening up is going to be based on regional perceptions of risk.

Yeah and I think as a whole, way more people have had it without knowing, and do have it currently (which is the hardest part). I thought they were doing some test here in the US that was going to get a bead on % of who's had it vs. what's confirmed. Still need to know what sort of immunity there is.

RE: athletics, even regionally in a state like Iowa: won't some towns or cities have more clusters than other spots, making having a high school sports season more difficult? Not arguing, just thoughts on it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cyclonepride

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
98,831
62,395
113
55
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
Yeah and I think as a whole, way more people have had it without knowing, and do have it currently (which is the hardest part). I thought they were doing some test here in the US that was going to get a bead on % of who's had it vs. what's confirmed. Still need to know what sort of immunity there is.

RE: athletics, even regionally in a state like Iowa: won't some towns or cities have more clusters than other spots, making having a high school sports season more difficult? Not arguing, just thoughts on it.

I'm pretty sure they're just starting to roll out testing that can identify both whether you have it or have had it. Getting that into wide use seems to be the critical step, IMO.
 

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,323
55,226
113
I'm pretty sure they're just starting to roll out testing that can identify both whether you have it or have had it. Getting that into wide use seems to be the critical step, IMO.

Yeah my concern is if it's a home test? Has kind of a 3rd rate/unreliable sort of feeling. Ideally it turns into something where you can get in, get the test, get results soonish.

I'm wishfully thinking and likely way off on this but with universities or sports organizations losing money, do we see a reprioritization of where money goes to or if it gets spent the same way?

Are we still going to blindly assume someone is worth hundreds of millions of dollars because they play a sport?
 

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
98,831
62,395
113
55
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
Yeah my concern is if it's a home test? Has kind of a 3rd rate/unreliable sort of feeling. Ideally it turns into something where you can get in, get the test, get results soonish.

I'm wishfully thinking and likely way off on this but with universities or sports organizations losing money, do we see a reprioritization of where money goes to or if it gets spent the same way?

Are we still going to blindly assume someone is worth hundreds of millions of dollars because they play a sport?

I don't think the FDA is allowing home testing at this point. Seems like a mistake for completely forbid them, as it limits that amount of people who can be tested quickly, but reliability of result is important. Hopefully some of those can be proven effective enough soon.
 

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
98,831
62,395
113
55
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
I'd add that a fairly widespread, random testing regime would help more than anything. Right now, we're testing people who are highly likely, which corrupts the data, and makes you unable to extrapolate. With widespread random testing, you can get a very good picture of the whole population pretty quickly.
 

WhoISthis

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2010
5,620
3,569
113
Which they then bring home to their family. Sorry, kids, I made a bad choice. Now you suffer. My bad.
Sorry otherwise routine medical procedures, you suffer. My bad.

CyclonePride is why society can’t be trusted to handle public goods like clean air, pollution control, public health, etc. He IS the case for the need for a strong, overbearing government.

I appreciate the attempt to look at different solutions, and total societal costs, but public goods need regulatory protection imo
 

yowza

Well-Known Member
Jun 2, 2016
2,094
287
113
I don't watch a whole lot of sports in summer anyways unless the Twins are on, but I'll definitely tune in to watching two broomsticks wrestle at this point.

Golf back in maybe a month. Plan to start back with no spectators.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mj4cy

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,323
55,226
113
Then they might get sick. Individual responsibility and all that.

My concern--do people think because they feel fine that they're in the clear and visit vulnerable family or friends? That's already happening now after months of widespread knowledge that symptoms don't have to be present.

I don't think of that as being responsible.