Fauci and the near future of sporting contests

WhoISthis

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2010
5,620
3,569
113
If only there were some kind of protocol for when people are unexpectedly unable to play sports due to medical issues...
There isn’t, at least not a good one for the contingency I’m talking about. I don’t recall a team ever losing significant numbers for a couple weeks, but they’ll figure something out.

The point is, threats to competition are bigger than spread risk. Spread risk isn’t going to stop the millions/billions that can be made from sports back in some capacity.
 

WhoISthis

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2010
5,620
3,569
113
would society really wait years to protect 1% of the population from death or will we accept that reality and go back to mostly normal with masks and hand sanitizers with everything reopened.
Wait years? You mean months. The football season is 4.5 months away.

Going back to mostly normal is inclusive of watching sports on TV for most of America. Let’s not pretend fans no able to go to a stadium a handful of times a month isn’t mostly normal.


I think there will be sports, but not thousands of fans until we’re closer to herd immunity and widespread testing. That could be this fall, but will require a competency we haven’t seen
 

CyJack13

Well-Known Member
May 21, 2010
12,666
1,665
113
The entire team would be unable to compete, not just the affected ones...

Right I don’t get what happens once one player tests positive. You have to quarantine the whole team for 14 days. They just forfeit all the games during that time?

Also let’s be real on the sequestering these guys, you think they’re just gonna go without getting any ***** for the entire season?
 
  • Like
Reactions: reignofthetiger

goody2012

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 28, 2014
1,143
1,300
113
Right I don’t get what happens once one player tests positive. You have to quarantine the whole team for 14 days. They just forfeit all the games during that time?

Also let’s be real on the sequestering these guys, you think they’re just gonna go without getting any ***** for the entire season?
Let's just give them all the 'rona before the season starts then we're good to go.
 

Rural

Well-Known Member
Feb 3, 2010
42,914
36,128
113
Just heard some ESPN chatter (rare occurrence for me) that college football may play a February to June season.

That would be wild.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,420
65,634
113
LA LA Land
Golf and tennis are the widely watched sports where it would be relatively easy to get it back with no spectators and not even put any athletes near each other.

The Masters might look even more beautiful on HDTV without the gallery.

Football/basketball/baseball lose a lot on TV without a crowd. As does soccer, I've seen the biggest soccer leagues play empty stadium games as a punishment for racist fan behavior and it's just not the same.
 

WhoISthis

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2010
5,620
3,569
113
Right I don’t get what happens once one player tests positive. You have to quarantine the whole team for 14 days. They just forfeit all the games during that time?

Also let’s be real on the sequestering these guys, you think they’re just gonna go without getting any ***** for the entire season?
Right, because they’re not going to get ***** and potentially spread otherwise. These guys aren’t sitting in their homes studying all day.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,420
65,634
113
LA LA Land
Just heard some ESPN chatter (rare occurrence for me) that college football may play a February to June season.

That would be wild.

I already scheduled Texas and Oklahoma for mid February dates in Ames.
 

nfrine

Well-Known Member
Mar 31, 2006
9,835
11,999
113
Nearby
The PGA is starting back up at the beginning of June. I would think that is one of the safest pro sports to start back up.. Honestly, they could probably be playing right now. The entire risk is the travel.
Golf won't be the same without some jackwad in the gallery hollaring "Get in the hole".:rolleyes:
 

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,209
55,100
113
It usually takes years not months to develop new vaccines so would society really wait years to protect 1% of the population from death or will we accept that reality and go back to mostly normal with masks and hand sanitizers with everything reopened.

Well if 3.5 million Americans die of this before August I guess you'll be ok with it as long as you're entertained?
 

Rural

Well-Known Member
Feb 3, 2010
42,914
36,128
113
Even Fauci's plan for baseball would be a monumental undertaking to produce just TV content (granted, it'd be highly watched because there is nothing else and gets gamblers off the ledge).
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
61,623
23,874
113
Macomb, MI
Right I don’t get what happens once one player tests positive. You have to quarantine the whole team for 14 days. They just forfeit all the games during that time?

Also let’s be real on the sequestering these guys, you think they’re just gonna go without getting any ***** for the entire season?

Depending on who ends up testing positive and the timing of the whole thing, it could actually be several teams that end up getting quarantined. When what's-his-name of the Jazz tested positive at the beginning of this thing, at least 4 other different teams (including the Detroit Pistons, which is why I still remember this) also had to be tested because they were recent opponents.
 

WhoISthis

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2010
5,620
3,569
113
Well if 3.5 million Americans die of this before August I guess you'll be ok with it as long as you're entertained?
This as a bad as those saying it’s a hoax.

You can have sports (or whatever proxy you want for some normalcy) without 3.5 million deaths. There’s a vast in between.

Also, for 3.5 million to die by before August, we’d nearly have to intentionally spread it. We’d also have achieved herd immunity.
 

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,209
55,100
113
This as a bad as those saying it’s a hoax.

You can have sports (or whatever proxy you want for some normalcy) without 3.5 million deaths. There’s a vast in between.

Also, for 3.5 million to die by before August, we’d nearly have to intentionally spread it. We’d also have achieved herd immunity.

To be clear, I wasn't vying for that.

People act like 1% is no big deal. It's a huge deal.

For anything to open up there's going to need to be a balance but there also needs to be a well executed plan.
 

MuskieCy

Well-Known Member
Nov 4, 2006
3,609
5,831
113
I heard that San Francisco was lucky to have lost the Super Bowl. A parade with millions of spectators at that time and it would have been worse than NYC has been.
 

isutrevman

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2007
7,372
9,952
113
38
Ames, IA
To be clear, I wasn't vying for that.

People act like 1% is no big deal. It's a huge deal.

For anything to open up there's going to need to be a balance but there also needs to be a well executed plan.
The mortality rate is more likely closer to 0.2%-3% than it is 1%. Still a big deal, yes, but I will be shocked if it's actually near 1%.
 

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,209
55,100
113
The mortality rate is more likely closer to 0.2%-3% than it is 1%. Still a big deal, yes, but I will be shocked if it's actually near 1%.

I'm not even sure if it'll be that vs. all the cases that were unknown about but opening up to an explosion of cases is a scary thought.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron