I think we typed our same thoughts at the same time....Without quality line play the QB is never going to be terribly accurate. There will be too many hurried throws, early throws, throws on the run and balls thrown away to save a sack to get much higher than the accuracy we are experiencing now. In addition if the line consistently can't buy time the defenses ISU face will know they can press and not have to worry about something developing over the top since there isn't time for that. That makes all of the throws you are making in more congestion and traffic with tighter coverage.
If the line is indeed upgraded then Park has a chance.
That was a complete team with a good defense, a good offensive line and good skill position players. Sage had to be more of a game manager than a Seneca Wallace QB.It's amazing that with the record we had in 2000, Sage had one of the worst percentages in the last 16 years.
When you consider how the game of football has evolved, it's just flat out depressing that we haven't averaged 30 points a game in 41 years.
2003: 116th at 14.4
I would be fine with that as long as we are putting it in the end zone on the ground as well.Man it's depressing to look at our passing numbers... isn't the record for tds in a season only 19?
Mother of God...Good ol' 2003. Woof!
Even worse, 27% of ISU's points that season came in one game (48 points vs. Ohio).