CFB Playoff Discussion

clonedude

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2006
32,865
29,009
113
If the committee has any integrity at all, they will leave the standings as is. Nothing was done today to change what they had last week.

How do you move a team down for winning 55-3? You can't.
 

CyFan61

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2010
14,540
273
83
The 538 model (ESPN's Nate Silver statistics venture)'s odds are:

100% = Alabama
100% = Oregon
91% = TCU
68% = Florida State
40% = Ohio State
1% = Baylor

Interesting, right? TCU's odds are well above Florida State's.

I would love to see the committee show the balls to go with Bama, Oregon, TCU, and Ohio State.
 

ISUFan22

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
33,923
904
113
Denver, CO
They're not identical. Even "similar" is a stretch. When you reduce this down to a kindergarten level, like you did with "Head. To. Head." you necessarily ignore every other factor. When you consider it, there's an argument that TCU is more deserving. A winning argument IMO.

It's hilarious you mention kindergarten level when head to head decides pretty much any tie in all of sports. Teams are clearly tied. Period. Baylor beat TCU.

It's also funny you are reaching to make TCUs body of work so much better than Baylor over a non-conference game.

There is no no kindergarten level here other than the silly arguments you are trying to make. That little Indiana, WVU and VaTech rant you did was cute tho.
 

Doc

This is it Morty
Aug 6, 2006
37,437
21,963
113
Denver
I love that the teams made it hard on the committee. That was all I was asking for and they sure came through.
 

CyFan61

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2010
14,540
273
83
There is no no kindergarten level here other than the silly arguments you are trying to make. That little Indiana, WVU and VaTech rant you did was cute tho.

B-b-but HEAD. TO. HEAD. Indiana beat Mizzou. Indiana SEC East champion t-shirts now available. Hed 2 hed.
 

ISUFan22

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
33,923
904
113
Denver, CO
If the committee has any integrity at all, they will leave the standings as is. Nothing was done today to change what they had last week.

How do you move a team down for winning 55-3? You can't.
This I woild agree fully with. I think it's crap Baylor is behind TCU. But, penalizing teams for beating/dominating teams in front of them is also silly.
 

WastedTalent

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2012
7,193
4,422
113
40
I really hope the committee moves to this approach in the future; don't release any rankings at all until "Selection Sunday." Don't give ESPN and the rest of the media a chance to run a hype machine for the big boys like Ohio State. I mean, they still would do so, but it wouldn't be quite as much of a full court press if they didn't see OSU behind little old TCU in the rankings.

Exactly. They would *****, but it would only be for a day or two, similar to bball.

Also, does anybody know if the committee is going to have a spokesperson justifying their rankings after they come out tomorrow? I have a feeling, whoever it is, will basically be an NCAA puppet, but could be interesting.
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
61,557
23,790
113
Macomb, MI
I would expect a top 4 team to beat g state by more than 2. On the other hand tcu did exactly what a top team would do.

1. Georgia Tech, not Georgia St.

2. Beating the #11 team in the nation by any score is a better resume builder than a top team blowing out one of the worst teams in the nation.
 

ISUFan22

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
33,923
904
113
Denver, CO
B-b-but HEAD. TO. HEAD. Indiana beat Mizzou. Indiana SEC East champion t-shirts now available. Hed 2 hed.
I'm laughing at your childish and incoherent rant. Quite comical. It is what people like you resort to when the facts are not on their side.

And yet you claimed I was on the kindergarten level with my points. Ha. I thought I was on your ignore list - that you had it repeatedly post about.

#obsessed
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
61,557
23,790
113
Macomb, MI
The 538 model (ESPN's Nate Silver statistics venture)'s odds are:

100% = Alabama
100% = Oregon
91% = TCU
68% = Florida State
40% = Ohio State
1% = Baylor

Interesting, right? TCU's odds are well above Florida State's.

I would love to see the committee show the balls to go with Bama, Oregon, TCU, and Ohio State.

ESPN is ending their relationship with 538 on Monday (tomorrow is not a business day).
 

IAStubborn

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2012
7,380
623
113
also, having barry alverez from Wisc on the committee doesn't help the big 12. "well OSY needs to be in because look at the beat down they gave us and we are awesome. so they must be awesomer."
And then Osborne says ands wisky laid Dow a major beat down on us and we are awesome so Ohio state must be reall really awesome.
 

Incyte

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2007
4,956
931
83
1. Georgia Tech, not Georgia St.

2. Beating the #11 team in the nation by any score is a better resume builder than a top team blowing out one of the worst teams in the nation.

Resume builder? What did fsu do to change a committee members rankings from last week? NOTHING. There is a reason nate silver has tcu at 91%.
 

CyFan61

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2010
14,540
273
83
Nate Silver also says that the 538 model would favor Ohio State to jump in over TCU if TCU had been ranked #4 last week instead of #3. More interesting now.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron