You spend hours in line returning those cans. To get money back that you were charged for when purchasing.
1) If your investment in time is hours at a time. I suggest you find the mass redemption center closest to you. Once I did this it cut my time tremendously and made the experience much more pleasant. Even if you have to travel some distance, you will likely save a lot of time. However, this does open a potential waste of energy, so it depends on your exact situation. Maybe see my point #3.
I believe we would all hate to see how many aluminum cans and bottles are not redeemed for the 5 cent refund and end up in the landfill anyway.
2). I know in a microcosm, I am VERY disappointed in the amount of recyclable materials I see dumped by my renters (I am responsible for their trash and recycling) and the recyclable materials I see at the dump when I dump or materials. So yes, people still don't recycle like they should. Do you propose that since some people break rules, that you should just get rid of them? Sounds rather short sighted. I am also concerned about how wasteful our society is. It would completely disappoint our conservative (from a frugality perspective) forefathers and mother's if they saw how we waste our materials. There would be no need for this kind of system if people did not litter and cared for our limited resources. But, unfortunately, they don't, so this is a proven method to help encourage many of them to do so. Is it an unnecessary hassle for those that would do the right thing without it, sure. But, sometimes there are things most of us have to abide by because some or a few of us wouldn't if not told/required to.
There is no county redemption center in my county. No one cares. There are many counties with only one.
3). I feel bad for you in this circumstance. Do the locations you purchase these materials from refuse to take the containers? I don't believe that is allowed and you should be bringing that up to the powers that be. If you are complaining about the amount of time or energy it takes to redeem the containers, then I would suggest you coordinate your redemption with your purchases. That has worked for me since they installed this law.
Our legislature thinks this is too hard of a problem to solve. It is not a partisan issue. This is a consumer issue created by antiquated legislation.
4). So what you are saying is providing an incentive for our fellow state brethren to help protect our limited resources and keep our state just a little cleaner is antiquated? Then I suppose we have a difference of opinion.
Consumers are paying a Nickle for each can or bottle. I think the only reason the law is left in place is to keep roadsides a bit cleaner.
5). It is a proven fact that it does. It is also a fact that it keeps an important resource from being buried in landfills because of people who either don't understand our earth's limitations or don't care about them.
Other than that I dont think it is saving our landfills.
6). You may be correct about this. So, I propose we start a new program that expands this program to all packaging types, requiring us to redeem every kind of consumer packaging. If your concern is saving the landfills that would go a long way toward it.
Now, let me help you understand my point here. There is no way people would put up with this. They would cry bloody murder if they had to redeem every stupid, unnecessary clamshell package manufacturers spit out. Maybe then we would see better packaging practices by manufacturers, a reduction in completely unnecessary waste, the use of less fossil fuels to price then and the saving off the landfills you believe need saving.
OR everyone could act responsibly and we wouldn't have to have any of these carrot and stick methods. Unfortunately, society has not come that far yet.
I liked how you stated your thoughts in your opening volley. I don't necessarily agree with you, but you made a nice opening statement.
I am interested in your well thought out rebuttal to my response.