Can/Bottle Redemption

NickTheGreat

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 17, 2012
10,803
4,773
113
Central Iowa
If grocery stores don't have to accept returns, I'm not sure where people would go. I mean, there's one redemption center in all of the DSM Metro?

I've decided to recycle or donate my cans for the last 2 or 3 yeras and my quality of life has improved. I just consider it part of the the cost of the beer.
 

Clark

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2009
18,451
4,716
113
Altoona
If grocery stores don't have to accept returns, I'm not sure where people would go. I mean, there's one redemption center in all of the DSM Metro?

I've decided to recycle or donate my cans for the last 2 or 3 yeras and my quality of life has improved. I just consider it part of the the cost of the beer.

The theory is that the increase in payouts to the redemption center will cause more people to open them. If that doesn't happen they've just effectively killed the bill anyway which is what some of them wanted all along.
 

NorthCyd

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 22, 2011
21,169
35,744
113
Maybe I'm wrong, but it doesn't seem all that different than the current rule. Stores still have to have a redemption center relatively close by to not accept redemptions or they have to have an agreement with a redemption center to set up a mobile redemption unit. Before stores could always ask for a waiver if they had a redemption center within a certain distance of them. This does away with the waiver process. If no new redemption centers pop up most stores are still going to have take redemptions. It will be interesting to see if that is a big enough increase to actually increase the number of redemption centers.
 

Ms3r4ISU

Me: Mea culpa. Also me: Sine cura sis.
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 7, 2008
12,885
8,435
113
Ames
Maybe I'm wrong, but it doesn't seem all that different than the current rule. Stores still have to have a redemption center relatively close by to not accept redemptions or they have to have an agreement with a redemption center to set up a mobile redemption unit. Before stores could always ask for a waiver if they had a redemption center within a certain distance of them. This does away with the waiver process. If no new redemption centers pop up most stores are still going to have take redemptions. It will be interesting to see if that is a big enough increase to actually increase the number of redemption centers.
Except that some of that was allowed to "slide" the past few years, and Fareway stopped taking them altogether.

I haven't read the entire bill, but am wondering if the language about purchasing for consumption off-premises also applies to restaurants selling to-go alcohol. Do they also need to accept returns?
 

Gink

Well-Known Member
Apr 23, 2007
1,090
80
48
I do notice less cans littered along the roads in Iowa then other states without a deposit. Although with inflation the the effectiveness may be decreasing.
 

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,531
74,295
113
Ankeny
Maybe I'm wrong, but it doesn't seem all that different than the current rule. Stores still have to have a redemption center relatively close by to not accept redemptions or they have to have an agreement with a redemption center to set up a mobile redemption unit. Before stores could always ask for a waiver if they had a redemption center within a certain distance of them. This does away with the waiver process. If no new redemption centers pop up most stores are still going to have take redemptions. It will be interesting to see if that is a big enough increase to actually increase the number of redemption centers.

When "relatively close" is "within 10 miles", that really limits things especially in cities when there aren't all that many of them and those that do exist have extremely limited hours.

We should just end it. Most people have curbside recycling at this point and other states without these deposits don't have noticeably more issues than we do. Attitudes changed overall about litter.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: 1100011CS

swiacy

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2009
2,208
2,003
113
I see both sides of the argument and would prefer if they keep the bottle bill to make it lucrative enough for the redemption centers to function as a profitable business. If they end the bill, I would make it mandatory that they end the open container part of the drunk driving law. The only litter I see consistently out here in the boonies is the person who is slamming a beer while driving home or just cruising and throws his empty out the window because he does not want stopped with an open container. IMO, that law is a huge contributor to littering second only to Dbags who are clueless.
 

cyclone87

Well-Known Member
Apr 6, 2011
3,319
1,542
113
Ames, IA
Hopefully more redemption centers open. There used to be many of them around the state. I know a lot of people who don’t redeem them now as it’s not worth the hassle with the can machines or driving to the nearest redemption center. I know the data shows many don’t get redeemed. If this doesn’t work then maybe it’s time to end it
 

wxman1

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jul 2, 2008
19,938
16,320
113
Cedar Rapids
Can shed has drastically expanded in the CR metro. Used to just be one place on the SW side with I think some remote places you could drop off at grocery stores. Now they have opened locations in Hiawatha and Marion in the last couple of years.
 

BuffettClone

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2012
2,632
1,922
113
Stupid question, does this bill mean the redemption centers will get 3 cents per can and the people dropping them off get the remaining 2 of the 5 cent deposit?
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron