when some of the people wanting him off the team are big Prohm defenders, that's where I have a problem.
If somebody likes the coach that much, then why not defend the coach that thinks he should still be on the team?
We never really found out why he missed the Texas game and then didn't play in the next one, did we?
It's not as cut and dry as 'kick him off' for many but more like at some point only so much can be done. Sounds like it's way better than we can speculate which digs deeper into why he's around.
If he's still at ISU in two years and doing what he has the ability to do and is even more prepared for what's next it will be a great story.