Another wrinkle in the future of ISU Athletics

Cycsk

Year-round tailgater
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 17, 2009
28,290
17,121
113
Pollard probably has a veto for the choice of the new President.
 

Dirt Boy 2

Well-Known Member
Feb 23, 2013
306
337
63
Seems like the 2 more popular university presidents were people already associated with ISU. Jiskche was president when I attended, I don’t remember him being well liked among the student population and he was looking to move on. Are there current administrators at ISU that have the necessary background to be a university president at a major university? I feel like having someone that knows our university, knows the history we have faced.
 

CYdTracked

Well-Known Member
Mar 23, 2006
18,457
9,262
113
Grimes, IA
Seems like the 2 more popular university presidents were people already associated with ISU. Jiskche was president when I attended, I don’t remember him being well liked among the student population and he was looking to move on. Are there current administrators at ISU that have the necessary background to be a university president at a major university? I feel like having someone that knows our university, knows the history we have faced.
Jiskche was good at fund raising for the university but overall I don't think he was very well liked. He didn't make athletics a priority either. Geoffroy was the best ISU president during my lifetime IMO. He was not scared to interact with the students and actually listen to them on issues. I remember 1 year during move in when I was a RA in the dorms he and his wife were walking the floor welcoming students and handing out treats. He stopped by my room and we had a nice conversation and he thanked me for taking on the challenge of being an RA. Also felt like he and Pollard were on the same page when it came with athletics and he supported a lot of the aggressive visions Pollard had with where he wanted to take the athletics department. Leath has his issues at the end of his tenure as well as being the one to permanently end VEISHEA. I could care less about losing VEISHEA as it just felt like another Greek week to me on campus but I know some hate Leath for that. With all the issues over the years surrounding VEISSHEA it was probably inevitable it was going to end at some point IMO. It had strayed away from what it was supposed to be about and not worth the risk of all the violence and problems that were becoming a part of it. Wintersteen has done a good job, I can't really think of any negatives tied to her tenure.

From an athletics standpoint we definitely need the next president that will see eye to eye with Pollard and knows what it is going to take to stay competitive in this new era of college athletics. However, when the regents go through candidates academics is a big part of the selection process too as it is an academic institution they will be in charge of so I doubt Pollard has much of "veto" power because he is not part of the board that will ultimately select the new president.
 

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,266
73,684
113
Ankeny
View attachment 149569

I thought it was one of the manure piles at the ISU horse barn?

He hates manure

mHHFqcA.jpeg
 

enisthemenace

Well-Known Member
Dec 5, 2009
13,836
9,974
113
Runnells, IA
Jiskche was good at fund raising for the university but overall I don't think he was very well liked. He didn't make athletics a priority either. Geoffroy was the best ISU president during my lifetime IMO. He was not scared to interact with the students and actually listen to them on issues. I remember 1 year during move in when I was a RA in the dorms he and his wife were walking the floor welcoming students and handing out treats. He stopped by my room and we had a nice conversation and he thanked me for taking on the challenge of being an RA. Also felt like he and Pollard were on the same page when it came with athletics and he supported a lot of the aggressive visions Pollard had with where he wanted to take the athletics department. Leath has his issues at the end of his tenure as well as being the one to permanently end VEISHEA. I could care less about losing VEISHEA as it just felt like another Greek week to me on campus but I know some hate Leath for that. With all the issues over the years surrounding VEISSHEA it was probably inevitable it was going to end at some point IMO. It had strayed away from what it was supposed to be about and not worth the risk of all the violence and problems that were becoming a part of it. Wintersteen has done a good job, I can't really think of any negatives tied to her tenure.

From an athletics standpoint we definitely need the next president that will see eye to eye with Pollard and knows what it is going to take to stay competitive in this new era of college athletics. However, when the regents go through candidates academics is a big part of the selection process too as it is an academic institution they will be in charge of so I doubt Pollard has much of "veto" power because he is not part of the board that will ultimately select the new president.
Pretty spot on.

Wintersteen has been great. As others have said, and most everyone is thinking, Iowa State needs to ******* nail the successor hire.
 

beentherebefore

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,452
1,857
113
Considering the importance of the ISU buildings named after former university presidents, one has to assume that (in no particular order) these are the top three:

James Hilton
William Beardshear
Robert Parks
 

VeloClone

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
48,049
38,629
113
Brooklyn Park, MN
Considering the importance of the ISU buildings named after former university presidents, one has to assume that (in no particular order) these are the top three:

James Hilton
William Beardshear
Robert Parks
HIlton had the vision of the Iowa State Center including Hilton, Trice, Stephens, Fisher and Scheman. It was groundbreaking at the time. Hilton, along with Parks, oversaw the growth of Iowa State College into a true university. He pushed for the development of humanities programs to augment ISU's strong science, technology and agricultural roots.

Parks was the longest tenured president serving over 20 years from 1965-1986. During his tenure ISU added 3 new colleges (Education, Design, and Business), 37 new buildings, and enrollment increased by 90%. ISU's research budget increased by 300% during his tenure.

Beardshear, as you might imagine, had a kick ass beard.
eyJidWNrZXQiOiJhc3NldHMucHVicHViLm9yZyIsImtleSI6ImF2Z3JneGk4LzcxNjEzNTg3MDk0NDkxLmpwZyIsImVkaXRzIjp7InJlc2l6ZSI6eyJ3aWR0aCI6ODAwLCJmaXQiOiJpbnNpZGUiLCJ3aXRob3V0RW5sYXJnZW1lbnQiOnRydWV9fX0=


Seriously, though Beardshear was kind of the Father of Iowa State in that he oversaw the growth of ISU into a true agricultural college.
 

cycloner29

Well-Known Member
Dec 17, 2008
12,762
12,286
113
Ames
Jiskche was good at fund raising for the university but overall I don't think he was very well liked. He didn't make athletics a priority either. Geoffroy was the best ISU president during my lifetime IMO. He was not scared to interact with the students and actually listen to them on issues. I remember 1 year during move in when I was a RA in the dorms he and his wife were walking the floor welcoming students and handing out treats. He stopped by my room and we had a nice conversation and he thanked me for taking on the challenge of being an RA. Also felt like he and Pollard were on the same page when it came with athletics and he supported a lot of the aggressive visions Pollard had with where he wanted to take the athletics department. Leath has his issues at the end of his tenure as well as being the one to permanently end VEISHEA. I could care less about losing VEISHEA as it just felt like another Greek week to me on campus but I know some hate Leath for that. With all the issues over the years surrounding VEISSHEA it was probably inevitable it was going to end at some point IMO. It had strayed away from what it was supposed to be about and not worth the risk of all the violence and problems that were becoming a part of it. Wintersteen has done a good job, I can't really think of any negatives tied to her tenure.

From an athletics standpoint we definitely need the next president that will see eye to eye with Pollard and knows what it is going to take to stay competitive in this new era of college athletics. However, when the regents go through candidates academics is a big part of the selection process too as it is an academic institution they will be in charge of so I doubt Pollard has much of "veto" power because he is not part of the board that will ultimately select the new president.

I graduated when Eaton was president. Woke up one morning, after a Veisha riot, as I lived in BWR across from the Knoll with people chanting, "Gordy! Gordy! Go Back to Texas" all the while someone had torched his Sunday paper.