Some male teacher was told to resign after multiple complaints from students about inappropriate behavior/touching. Obviously didnt make the news...What happened in Norwalk?
I blame Pornhub
Go on..... visual proof please so I can really see the issueThe next problem is going to be stepmoms......
I am not saying what the coach did was right nor a minor technicality, I am just saying he was convicted and then it was over turned by the SC of Iowa because the law only said teachers, and did not include coaches, it have since been amended.I agree. And because one was "just" a coach shouldn't be a minor technicality. If he actually did know what was going on with his "licensed" buddy....then the consequences should apply across the board. Unless the state has no jurisdiction on those without a license. Then I guess it would be up to the family and I know if it was me......even if my daughter was considered the local tramp
.....he's going up state hand in hand with his friend.
I am not saying what the coaching did was right nor a minor technicality, I am just saying he was convicted and then it was over turned by the SC of Iowa because the law only said teachers, and did not include coaches, it have since been amended.
Here is a link to the case.
Court overturns coach's sexual exploitation case - Washington Times
And this is why I hate typing instead of talking. I was not implying you were thinking that, I was just conveying my thoughts if that was why individual who happened to be "just" a coach wasn't held to the same standard. And after reading your link.....that is exactly what I feared. He wasn't licensed by the state hence he cannot be held accountable by the state. I am glad to hear it has since been amended because that's the worst kind of all the kind of BS the state can shovel.
Under the amended law he would have been, which I am sure states "any school personal", so that could be anyone from the certified staff, to coaches, secretaries, non certified, to the janitors and bus drivers.Why couldn't he be arrested? He was 36 and banging a 16 year old. Isn't that illegal? If not then WTF???
In the interest of gender inclusivity, here's another teacher--student "incident".
![]()
Ex-Texas high school teacher gets two life sentences for molesting children
A former Texas high school chemistry teacher was slapped with two life sentences after admitting he molested two children “multiple times,” according to a report. Topher James Stout, 41…nypost.com
I believe Topher is short for Christopher if the person doesn't want to go by Chris. I suppose it can stand by itself too. Personally I find it weird.Topher?
It says that this investigation was due to incidents in 2020 - so she would have been 21 or younger. I wonder how old the minor involved was.Former GMG coach charged with sexual exploitation
A former coach and paraeducator at GMG has been arrested and charged with multiple counts of sexual exploitation by a school employee and one count of dissemination and exhibition of obscene material to minors. Brycelyn Haughey, 22, of Toledo, was arrested on Dec. 15, following an investigation...www.timesrepublican.com
Gotta feel for Chayce.
![]()
Brycelyn O’Connor
Brycelyn O’Connor is on Facebook. Join Facebook to connect with Brycelyn O’Connor and others you may know. Facebook gives people the power to share and makes the world more open and connected.www.facebook.com
Doesn't really matter. 16 is the age of consent, so under that it's illegal, over that it's not assuming there was consent.It says that this investigation was due to incidents in 2020 - so she would have been 21 or younger. I wonder how old the minor involved was.
It doesn't matter legally because she was charged under her status as a school employee so the age doesn't matter for the charge. But it could be a 17 year old and a 21 year old here - or it could be a lot worse. Just curious.Doesn't really matter. 16 is the age of consent, so under that it's illegal, over that it's not assuming there was consent.
It says he told her he was 17 and a junior, and she said close enough.It doesn't matter legally because she was charged under her status as a school employee so the age doesn't matter for the charge. But it could be a 17 year old and a 21 year old here - or it could be a lot worse. Just curious.
I missed the charge as a school employee so fair point. I'll move along now.It doesn't matter legally because she was charged under her status as a school employee so the age doesn't matter for the charge. But it could be a 17 year old and a 21 year old here - or it could be a lot worse. Just curious.