This year proves yet again that there has to be a socioeconomic equalizer and that the 16 team suburban only class was by far the best proposal to reorganize everything.
This model made it even harder for the DSM publics, CR other than Kennedy, Davenport, Sioux City, Council Bluffs and Waterloo schools to compete.
So what do you mean by a socioeconomic equalizer?
Sure economics comes into play. Families with means have the ability for their kids to get extra training and school equipment is newer & better.
But the real issue is youth sports programs and their communities investment in those activities. Not familiar with youth programs outside DSM, but both Valley & Dowling have long standing youth football programs for middle school kids. A lot of communities don't make that effort.
The other advantage that the successful HS programs has is iron sharpens iron. So success becomes automatic because underclassman practice against A LOT of high quality players. Whereas a program like Roosevelt, Lincoln or East might only have a handful of quality players.
I wish there was a solution, but I doubt if the DSM city schools played at a 2A level they would be successful.