Good news. Texas continues to refuse to take advantage of their brand.
Is Shaka really the standard we want to compare Prohm to?For all the people who want Prohm gone here's winning % at current schools:
Shaka (conference only) = 40-50 for .444
Prohm (conference only) = 94-60 for .610
Prohm with less resources as well (budget, national brand, local recruits, etc.)For all the people who want Prohm gone here's winning % at current schools:
Shaka (conference only) = 40-50 for .444
Prohm (conference only) = 94-60 for .610
For all the people who want Prohm gone here's winning % at current schools:
Shaka (conference only) = 40-50 for .444
Prohm (conference only) = 94-60 for .610
For all the people who want Prohm gone here's winning % at current schools:
Shaka (conference only) = 40-50 for .444
Prohm (conference only) = 94-60 for .610
If I were an AD, I’d probably take into consideration the current state we’re in with the pandemic, travel restrictions and maybe add that into the factor of whether or not I’d can the current coach I have knowing that there are those other hoops I have to jump through to find a replacement.
It's not like Texas was bad when Smart took over. Barnes took them to 16 tournaments in 17 years. They were arguably a better and more stable program than Iowa State, at least on par.please update with stats indicating where the programs were when each started
It's not like Texas was bad when Smart took over. Barnes took them to 16 tournaments in 17 years. They were arguably a better and more stable program than Iowa State, at least on par.
If I were an AD, I’d probably take into consideration the current state we’re in with the pandemic, travel restrictions and maybe add that into the factor of whether or not I’d can the current coach I have knowing that there are those other hoops I have to jump through to find a replacement.