He wont who said he was interested?
No one has said he is interested but several posters have mentioned him.
He wont who said he was interested?
Why would Altman come here exactly?
Hi steveA little realism for you all: Prohm can miss the tourney this year and next and he’s still not going anywhere unless he wants to. Look how many ways it takes to rationalize your stance against him, like “the sweet 16 wasn’t his players” or “no one cares about big 12 tourney wins” or “his top 25 class is only that high because of the number of players”. Truth is he’s accomplished as much as any coach we’ve ever had not named Larry Eustachy. And actually Larry has more bad seasons to his credit than Prohm.
NoA little realism for you all: Prohm can miss the tourney this year and next and he’s still not going anywhere unless he wants to. Look how many ways it takes to rationalize your stance against him, like “the sweet 16 wasn’t his players” or “no one cares about big 12 tourney wins” or “his top 25 class is only that high because of the number of players”. Truth is he’s accomplished as much as any coach we’ve ever had not named Larry Eustachy. And actually Larry has more bad seasons to his credit than Prohm.
A little realism for you all: Prohm can miss the tourney this year and next and he’s still not going anywhere unless he wants to. Look how many ways it takes to rationalize your stance against him, like “the sweet 16 wasn’t his players” or “no one cares about big 12 tourney wins” or “his top 25 class is only that high because of the number of players”. Truth is he’s accomplished as much as any coach we’ve ever had not named Larry Eustachy. And actually Larry has more bad seasons to his credit than Prohm.
Steve go to bed, practice tomorrow.Eustachy went 4-12 in the big 12 in 2002 and 5-11 in 2003 so there’s that. And he wasn’t fired for his record.
The best seasons we’ve had are with 3 and 4 year guys (Ejim 2014, Niang 2016, Monte, Thomas, Naz 2017). I feel like Prohm is starting to build the team with those type of players.
I’m not saying Prohm is the be all end all, I’m just saying his resume at ISU is as good as anyone we’ve had and people act like he doesn’t know what he’s doing.
Eustachy went 4-12 in the big 12 in 2002 and 5-11 in 2003 so there’s that. And he wasn’t fired for his record.
The best seasons we’ve had are with 3 and 4 year guys (Ejim 2014, Niang 2016, Monte, Thomas, Naz 2017). I feel like Prohm is starting to build the team with those type of players.
I’m not saying Prohm is the be all end all, I’m just saying his resume at ISU is as good as anyone we’ve had and people act like he doesn’t know what he’s doing.
Fred?A little realism for you all: Prohm can miss the tourney this year and next and he’s still not going anywhere unless he wants to. Look how many ways it takes to rationalize your stance against him, like “the sweet 16 wasn’t his players” or “no one cares about big 12 tourney wins” or “his top 25 class is only that high because of the number of players”. Truth is he’s accomplished as much as any coach we’ve ever had not named Larry Eustachy. And actually Larry has more bad seasons to his credit than Prohm.
well we did have a former athletic director on here before....Pollard?Hi steve
Since you want to compare Larry to Steve, a big part of being successful in college basketball is defending your home court. Larry had two seasons in his tenure where we did not lose a single game at Hilton. His last two seasons were rough with 5, however; his teams only got beat by more than 10 at home twice in 5 years. Larry's total home loses for his 5 years was 13.A little realism for you all: Prohm can miss the tourney this year and next and he’s still not going anywhere unless he wants to. Look how many ways it takes to rationalize your stance against him, like “the sweet 16 wasn’t his players” or “no one cares about big 12 tourney wins” or “his top 25 class is only that high because of the number of players”. Truth is he’s accomplished as much as any coach we’ve ever had not named Larry Eustachy. And actually Larry has more bad seasons to his credit than Prohm.
A little realism for you all: Prohm can miss the tourney this year and next and he’s still not going anywhere unless he wants to. Look how many ways it takes to rationalize your stance against him, like “the sweet 16 wasn’t his players” or “no one cares about big 12 tourney wins” or “his top 25 class is only that high because of the number of players”. Truth is he’s accomplished as much as any coach we’ve ever had not named Larry Eustachy. And actually Larry has more bad seasons to his credit than Prohm.
A little realism for you all: Prohm can miss the tourney this year and next and he’s still not going anywhere unless he wants to. Look how many ways it takes to rationalize your stance against him, like “the sweet 16 wasn’t his players” or “no one cares about big 12 tourney wins” or “his top 25 class is only that high because of the number of players”. Truth is he’s accomplished as much as any coach we’ve ever had not named Larry Eustachy. And actually Larry has more bad seasons to his credit than Prohm.
Eustachy went 4-12 in the big 12 in 2002 and 5-11 in 2003 so there’s that. And he wasn’t fired for his record.
The best seasons we’ve had are with 3 and 4 year guys (Ejim 2014, Niang 2016, Monte, Thomas, Naz 2017). I feel like Prohm is starting to build the team with those type of players.
I’m not saying Prohm is the be all end all, I’m just saying his resume at ISU is as good as anyone we’ve had and people act like he doesn’t know what he’s doing.
Steve go to bed, practice tomorrow.