They deserve to be ranked 4th and anyone who says otherwise has big 12 hating blinders on
So....basically most of the CFB media
They deserve to be ranked 4th and anyone who says otherwise has big 12 hating blinders on
I'm gonna blow a fuse if someone jumps Oklahoma next week after beating a top 10-15 Texas team and having 2 top-15 wins in the last two weeks. They have a "13th data point" now and have only 1 loss on their schedule a million days ago.
They deserve to be ranked 4th and anyone who says otherwise has big 12 hating blinders on
That was before the return of the CCG, things are a bit different now that there is a CCG. No one really knows how it will shake out.In the 2015 season, Oklahoma made it to the CFP but the Sugar Bowl selected #16 Oklahoma State with the Big 12 tie in. I keep seeing Bowl Projections where OU is in the CDF but Texas not in the Sugar Bowl!
I think we'd get the Alamo over them for sure. I understand the ratings with Grier and why they think that way though
In the 2015 season, Oklahoma made it to the CFP but the Sugar Bowl selected #16 Oklahoma State with the Big 12 tie in. I keep seeing Bowl Projections where OU is in the CDF but Texas not in the Sugar Bowl!
And if Texas wins, they also go to the Sugar Bowl, and OU is certain to get an at-large NY6 bowl. I think the only scenario where the Big 12 doesn't have two NY6/CFP teams is if OU wins in unimpressive fashion and misses the CFP. I'm tempted to want Texas to win that game to guarantee two NY6 teams.
I think the dream scenario is for OU to win a closely contested game and make the CFP while Texas goes to the Sugar Bowl. That would likely put ISU in the Alamo and WVU in the Camping World. In This scenario, the top 4 teams in the conference play ranked, Power 5 opponents in high profile, high payout Bowl games.
But will the CFP really take OU over OSU?
Those projections are wrong then. Sugar Bowl has to select a Big 12 team no matter what. The only way ISU ends up in Houston is if OU wins the Big 12, but gets jumped by OSU, forcing OU into the Sugar Bowl, and Texas doesn't get an at-large NY6 bowl (which is exactly what would happen). Texas would then go to the Alamo Bowl, and CWB in Orlando would choose between WV and ISU. That's how ISU to Houston comes into play.
My gripe is that the espn guys are saying how Ohio State deserves to be in over Oklahoma because Oklahoma has a bad defense. All year I heard all the media bash Ohio States defense too. Who cares if OU has a bad defense. Their resume overall is better.
Not scared of them at all. Having said that, I just have absolutely no desire to play them EVER after their departure from the Big 12 and how whiny they were.A big name might be fun, but I fear right now that A&M would lay the wood to us in a bad way.
I am curious if they had a rep at OU-WVU? Lots of empty seats at that game too and that had much greater implications.The Camping Bowl rep stopped by our tailgate early yesterday and was asking where all the people were. He didn't sound too impressed. I saw a prediction that had WVU vs Pitt in Orlando which I think would be hard for them to pass up.
Ohio State is probably going to thoroughly trash Northwestern. They will be laser focused, knowing they run up the score something ridiculous and they’ll be in the playoff over OU. Similar to Texas, they have been a team this season that can turn it on and off, and Playoff Committee loves them some cheap “style points”. OU will need to drub Texas to get in, especially if Georgia beats Alabama.
For the record, at the moment, ESPN's bowl projections are extremely favorable. It has OU in the playoff and Texas in the Sugar Bowl. One of the projections has us in the CWB in Orlando against Syracuse; the other has us in the Alamo Bowl against Utah (which is really weird because the other pick is WV vs WSU).
http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/25375570/college-football-bowl-projections-week-13