I get what you’re saying, but if you look a little deeper Homan was MUCH more valuable than Jones to their respective teams.
A.) Homan played twice as many minutes his senior year than Jones did. He also was the only real post player on a team that used a 6 man rotation in 2004. B.) On approximately the same usage rate, Jones had a turnover rate of 18.3 last year compared to Homan’s 12.2 his senior year. Homan had a win share of 4.3 his senior year. Jones had a win share of 1.2 last year.
Per 40 minutes, Homan averaged 15 pts, 9.6 RBs, 2.3 blocks, and 1.2 assists (on a much faster-paced team). Jones averaged 13.3 pts, 9.0 RBs, 0.9 blocks, and 2.1 assists. More importantly Jones averaged 3.2 turnovers and 6.3 fouls per 40 minutes versus 2.2 turnovers and 3.1 fouls per 40 for Homan.
Jones’ BPM per game was 0.7 last year (0.2 in the Big 12), meaning, statistically, he was almost more actively harmful as opposed to contributor to last year’s squad.