https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/
Nevada has over 22,000 cases today? Can’t be right?
Not seeing that on there
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/
Nevada has over 22,000 cases today? Can’t be right?
Something about the assumptions made by the models has changed. It goes well beyond taking into account the efforts being made to maintain social distance and working from home.
Maybe testing is indicating it's less virulent than originally thought, or herd immunity is farther along than is commonly believed.
Hopefully there is real data behind the revision because it is a radical departure from the someday scenarios that were operative until Monday. The public has a right (need?) to know how these projections turned on a dime.
Don't antibody tests give us a more accurate depiction and maybe a better data point for projections?
They're at least more useful than a general negative test imo.
You’ve got an extra 0.https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/
Nevada has over 22,000 cases today? Can’t be right?
I was at HyVee on Monday night and they wipe down the entire area you set your groceries as well as the card scanner between each customer.I have to admit at Hy Vee, Caseys, etc. I've found it comical they tape off 6 feet, put the plastic shield up, etc., but we all continue to touch the same display pad for debit card transactions...
Oh absolutely.
I just was not aware of their widespread use yet anywhere in the world, though. Last I had read they were still being developed and tested for accuracy.
So I was told about a family friend that runs a salon in a small town in Iowa, and was posting on FB that they're going to be open starting May 1. Will they be allowed to open up?
I get that the income will be hard to come by. Wouldn't it make more sense to have a Gofundme, and if enough people pay in like $20 (many would), they make enough for the time being since they're relying on other people for their income anyway?
They will be allowed to open unless the Governor extends her SIP order
http://www.healthdata.org/covid/updatesSomething about the assumptions made by the models has changed. It goes well beyond taking into account the efforts being made to maintain social distance and working from home.
Maybe testing is indicating it's less virulent than originally thought, or herd immunity is farther along than is commonly believed.
Hopefully there is real data behind the revision because it is a radical departure from the doomsday scenarios that were operative until Monday. The public has a right (need?) to know how these projections turned on a dime.
I'm keeping a disinfectant wipe with me and wiping that pad down prior and card down as soon as it gets out of the slot.
Something about the assumptions made by the models has changed. It goes well beyond taking into account the efforts being made to maintain social distance and working from home.
Maybe testing is indicating it's less virulent than originally thought, or herd immunity is farther along than is commonly believed.
Hopefully there is real data behind the revision because it is a radical departure from the doomsday scenarios that were operative until Monday. The public has a right (need?) to know how these projections turned on a dime.
Aren't the 61k death projections all based on the assumption that they are doing what Wuhan did in terms of mitigationI don't want to start another argument about the U. of Wash projections, but their model is very reactionary. And by "very" I mean extremely. I'm not saying it's worthless, but it's like setting a point spread for a game and then changing it every 5 minutes after the game starts. Of course then at the end you can say "See, we nailed it!" It wasn't very long ago it was predicting 3800 deaths in Iowa by 8/1.
Aren't the 61k death projections all based on the assumption that they are doing what Wuhan did in terms of mitigation
I have a Vegas kid ... thanks MGM!Except herpes and coronavirus. That ****'ll come back with you.
I have a Vegas kid ... thanks MGM!
I think what we may see as we reopen is more targeted recommendations versus the across the board closures we have today. Perhaps stores, restaurants, and offices open back up in May, but the government continues to recommend individuals in those high risk groups to continue to avoid going out and continue to work from home if possible.
My employer just informed us yesterday that whenever the all clear goes out to return to the office, it is not required to return. They said if you need to continue at home for whatever reason (high risk yourself, high risk family member, childcare closures, etc). I think that kind of approach would be good for jobs that can go remote. Let people make their own determinations about the appropriate level of exposure for their personal situation.
Aren't the 61k death projections all based on the assumption that they are doing what Wuhan did in terms of mitigation