Or they lose theirs, which is -550 at William Hill right now.I bet they keep doing this till AD gets his job back
I don’t think people realize how hard to enforce non competes are. Generally they are successful more as a deterrent than actually enforceable.If the contract says the employee can be terminated for any reason (and doesn't provide an explicit exception to the non-complete clause), then yes.
Be that as it may, it takes a lawsuit to void the clause -- or you risk a lawsuit if you break the clause.I don’t think people realize how hard to enforce non competes are. Generally they are successful more as a deterrent than actually enforceable.
Almost no one enforces the clause from what I understand. More of a formality as a deterrent as was alluded.Be that as it may, it takes a lawsuit to void the clause -- or you risk a lawsuit if you break the clause.
The first layoff I did as a manager I was assigned the group who survived the cuts
There is some guilt there. They took it worse than the group that wasn't terminated.
They absolutely would. The first time they don't, they set a precedent.Iheart wouldn't spend money on legal fees to stop someone who they just fired in a small market from taking another job. Too much risk, and a money loser.
They absolutely would. The first time they don't, they set a precedent.
That's one. And I can speak from experience that Cumulus' contracts were full of ambiguity. I was able leave them in 2013 because of that ambiguity.
Thanks Jared. Just an FYI I tried to stream your podcast with Nick Graham thru Google Podcasts a couple days ago. Kept getting an error before it would start. Not sure how or if that's something you could fix, but thought I'd give you a heads up. I will try downloading it too and see if it will play after that point, just haven't gotten around to trying that yet.Thought y'all would be interested to know the CF Podcast Network had its best day of the last six months yesterday and is on pace to surpass that today. We appreciate all of you who are listening.
I very highly doubt AD gets his job back.I bet they keep doing this till AD gets his job back
It is pretty much that way now. Music stations simulcast and/or have what's called voice tracking where the announcer records all the talk segments in advance. No interaction with the audience. Live, local talk radio is an expensive format. Airing network talk radio is basically free if the station agrees to air all the national ads. Music radio in the digital age is a computer in a room.That is a good question, but I bet they were. I have a feeling that Iheart in general was not making a profit and decided to go with the generic syndicated model for types of stations rather than looking at each individual station/show. If this was the case, it didn't matter if the show made money or not, it was going to get cut.
If I heart is so about cutting costs, why don't they just have a computer hooked to a broadcast tower that would run the same music/shows as every other city at the same time so there is no local shows anywhere. This seems to be the route they are going anyway.
Hosts do live reads in many cases.It seems to me that a podcast will not make anyone much money, but I may not understand that business model that well. I am stunned that some people make a living being a social media influencer.
If podcasts are advertiser sponsored, don't most people not even listen to the attached commercials?
I very highly doubt AD gets his job back.