Yes. Again, they lost by 20. If the game was played today, I think KSU wins, but the rest of KSU was terrible that night and Texas was not. That will happen in this league. But I do not think the KSU would of won that particular night if that were fully healthy.Are you still convinced that K-State would have lost at home to Texas with all their players healthy?
Granted I'm a little drunk, but where would you put us? Our defence, witch can be decent does not make up for our spotty offence.
- Ku - we'll know Monday night (Go Clones!)
- K-State - get all the leaders in MHK after Ames/Lubbock split
- ISU - most talented but tough roadies lurk
- TxT - unimpressive in Waco; two-game losing streak
- TCU - depth becoming an issue
- OU - better than horny? we'll see tonight
- Texas - see #6
- BU - surprised TxT
- WVU - cinged squawks
- oSu - battle hard but too little ordinance
TCU feels like the hardest team to place for me.I agree with this for the most part but would have TCU a bit lower.
TCU feels like the hardest team to place for me.
move baylor to the 2nd tier otherwise you are good.1) ISU, KSU, KU, TTU, BU
6) UT, OU,TCU
9) WV,OSU
Did you read the first part?
move baylor to the 2nd tier otherwise you are good.
Woof, swing and a miss on this one. Just a week ago I thought that.TCU is better than Texas, K-State, and Iowa State.
Woof, swing and a miss on this one. Just a week ago I thought that.
He has a bunch of good players, nothing approaching elite. He's also down to 8 or 9 on scholarship; 4 in the transfer portal for some reason. Robinson is an absolute stud point guard. He has some shooters around him. But nothing in the paint, zero. With that, TCU is a middling team that can beat anyone when hot or vice versa on an off night.Something's not right there. Either Dixon has lost them or word is out he is heading to UCLA or both I guess.