OK….everyone has pretty much been beaten over the head with the stories of big box stores and how they kill mom and pop shops (e.g….Wal-Mart killed Main St USA) , suck money out of the local economy, have below average customer service, and/or pay substandard wages. Some of this can be countered with examples of the savings they provide the average household by using economies of scale and their powerful distribution networks to offer a large variety of products at a much lower price than smaller, locally owned merchants can do. We’ve all heard this, maybe debated both sides, etc.
No matter where you fall on the scale of love-hate with the big boxes, it turns out there is a much more important issue to consider as to the viability of these stores and how they could be leading towards seriously hurting the future finances of your city or town. Have you considered if the huge footprint and all the related infrastructure these big boxes require ever generate enough tax revenue to pay for themselves long term? Could they actually end up being a net long term drag on your cities’ bottom-line?
Very interesting article on this issue that might have you rethinking if that shiny new development on the edge of your city is actually a good thing or not. At the very least, it will have you questioning why your city leaders would ever want to provide any tax advantages to such developments.
No matter where you fall on the scale of love-hate with the big boxes, it turns out there is a much more important issue to consider as to the viability of these stores and how they could be leading towards seriously hurting the future finances of your city or town. Have you considered if the huge footprint and all the related infrastructure these big boxes require ever generate enough tax revenue to pay for themselves long term? Could they actually end up being a net long term drag on your cities’ bottom-line?
Very interesting article on this issue that might have you rethinking if that shiny new development on the edge of your city is actually a good thing or not. At the very least, it will have you questioning why your city leaders would ever want to provide any tax advantages to such developments.
http://www.strongtowns.org/journal/2016/7/18/big-box-weekThis all serves to illuminate the fact that big box development is extremely risky. We, the taxpayers, put a pipe in the ground in our name and we’ve made an eternal promise that generation after generation is expected to make good on. The big box retailer builds a store and they’ve recouped their capital costs in a decade. They are then free and clear to move on leaving us with a dead site.
Their zealous obligation is to their shareholders. I can respect that, but our obligation to our taxpayers – today’s and tomorrow’s – needs to be equally zealous