If I remember right I think around 45.
Of course the Register would spin it that Ford thinks he will be a first rounder when he has him going mid second round. Never change Leistikow
If I remember right I think around 45.
I've said it a millions times because people seem to think it's better not to get drafted in the second round and "pick your team" in free agency instead. Statistically, there's a much higher chance of sticking with a team if you're drafted as opposed to not. See Roy Marble and Melvin Ejim in Orlando. I hope for that reason alone, someone takes a flyer on him.
Please let him go to any NBA team but the Bulls. Please.
Put it in the CF myth category along with - in the NBA they don't play defense. It would be way better if Niang gets drafted.
Put it in the CF myth category along with - in the NBA they don't play defense. It would be way better if Niang gets drafted.
It's more likely that we're told that so we feel better about Ejim/Kane/etc not being drafted. :twitcy:
Kinda like how you tell ugly people that inner beauty is what's really important.
While I don't know if it would be the best move for Fred, it might be the best chance for Georges to prove if he's got it or not.
Fred would play him and put him in a position to prove himself.
Now if it's not successful, then that hurts Fred and Georges.
I just want Georges to get a real shot and show what he can do. It would be nice if he went to a decent team and was that extra piece that makes them really successful. I don't think he'll ever be a dominant superstar, but I hope there's a place for him.
PelicansIdeally Georges gets drafted, and by a terrible team that just needs to score points and get people into seats.
I would also like to see the statistical analysis of this. It might be true, but I'm not sure it's that much of an advantage.
I would think going undrafted would increase the chances of signing oversees instead. Those that go undrafted and DO get an NBA shot may have a better chance of sticking than some of the late drafted players, but it might also be more difficult to get that NBA shot.
I think a lot of teams use late second round picks as sort of lottery picks to get rights to guys that could be good or could bomb. Any statistical advantage might be due to taking these risks.
If Niang can shoot the 3 consistently, I don't understand why you wouldn't draft him.
A little disheartening to see so much American talent taking a back seat to international players in the draft but that's the trend.
Anyone want to make a bet that if Uthoff does get drafted and Georges doesn't that AltHawk will be back on this thread, pounding his chest and bragging about how Iowa and Uthoff are actually the better program and player based on tonight's draft?
There are literally hundreds of guys that can "shoot the 3 consistently" that would kill for a chance to play in the NBA. Niang has no position in the NBA and most importantly, there is no where he can play defensively. He would get absolutely torched, even against bench units. There's not much demand in the NBA for a 6'6", unathletic PF.