Diallo looks like a real player so far. Must've just never been able to feel comfortable at KU.
This has been fun to watch. Georges is playing exactly like we've seen and still dominating on offense (also has given up some points on the other end). Amazing that a guy like Skal Labassiere, who clearly is an inferior player to Niang, will be drafted in the top 10.
Skal will most likely be a better NBA player, that's why. That said, there's a place in the NBA for Niang.
I would check ESPN3 or the WatchESPN app. I bet they will have the replay there.Are the scrimmages available online somewhere? I got home from work when gorgeous Georges scrimmage was wrapping up.
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/st...n-iowa-state-cyclone-randy-peterson/83822268/
Wrong. Warren's dad was contacted by Peterson for the story, which according to the article, was the product of RP watching the draft. Warren's dad doesn't mention 2,000 yards and is probably simply answering RP's questions.
I love the line, "Warren isn't on any 2017 mock drafts." Yet leave it to Randy to daydream about the possibility and consider it worthy of publication. 2000 yards? Sure, throw that in there too. Oh, and then projecting Tucker as a surefire draft pick. It's ISU fluff, plain and simple.
Two questions: What does the +/- indicate in the box score? And for someone who watched the scrimmage - why didn't Seldon get any minutes?
+/- is how the team performed when you played and didn't play. So it the team lost by two, but while you were on the court scores 40 points while giving up 30, you had a +/- of +10 because the team performed 10 points better than the other when you played.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong. I think it's a fairly newer stat as I don't remember it being talked about much a decade ago, and there's debate on how telling of a stat it actually is.
Just for comparison, in the second game Uthoff had a -23 (8 pts on 3-12 shooting, 0 assists, 4 rebs, including an "Eliingsonlike" 0-5 from downtown).+/- is how the team performed when you played and didn't play. So it the team lost by two, but while you were on the court scores 40 points while giving up 30, you had a +/- of +10 because the team performed 10 points better than the other when you played.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong. I think it's a fairly newer stat as I don't remember it being talked about much a decade ago, and there's debate on how telling of a stat it actually is.
Just for comparison, in the second game Uthoff had a -23 (8 pts on 3-12 shooting, 0 assists, 4 rebs, including an "Eliingsonlike" 0-5 from downtown).
So the two guys on his team who had -10 & -6...that was bad, and the guy who had +13 on the other team was a real boost to his team? Georges had a 0.
The idea behind it says so, yes.
Personally, I feel it's a poor way to judge one particular player, but can be effective in judging certain lineups.