The latter claim seems more significant to me. But it is really only relevant if Williamson and Ellis felt the same way - AND there is evidence that the disparate treatment of seniors was specifically because of their race.
Whoa, what thread was that?
I don't see a 477 post thread but there was a 476 post thread for a game against Ball State in 2009. You can sort on post count in each subforum.
The her side of the story (i.e. the lawsuit) should attempt to lay out the facts that this was the case.
The facts as laid out indicate two things to me: Ms. Moody was singled out for disparate treatment (Fennelly clearly didn't like her) and the 3 black seniors (Moody, Williamson and Ellis) were not treated like previous senior classes.
The latter claim seems more significant to me. But it is really only relevant if Williamson and Ellis felt the same way - AND there is evidence that the disparate treatment of seniors was specifically because of their race.
It's possible we're all burying the lede here, because this line from Hines' Twitter feed could possibly have NCAA repercussions for all sports (if proven true): "Moody's lawsuit also alleges that ISU athletic dept. 'only wanted athletes to pursue majors that could be manipulated by athletics staff.'"
Whoa whoa whoa. So I shouldn't have called Scott Christopherson "Thug Lyfe"?
But if you pay attention, arent most women's basketball coaches "dicks" in some ways; either that or they are no longer coaching.I don't want to pass judgment too soon, buuuuut isn't Fennelly kind of a **** to all of his players regardless of race?
Crap like that just dilutes her case. She should have stuck to the real (alleged) issues.Woof, just read through the whole lawsuit claims. Seriously, the fact she did not make the WNBA was because Bill had his friend cut her?
So when I see Bill in Minneapolis this summer, should I ask him about it?
But if you pay attention, arent most women's basketball coaches "dicks" in some ways; either that or they are no longer coaching.
Woof, just read through the whole lawsuit claims. Seriously, the fact she did not make the WNBA was because Bill had his friend cut her?
Some hard to believe stuff in there. If a fraction proves to be true it will be super bad. Even if none is true Fennelly is likely finished IMHO. Based on history he isn't going to get much benefit of the doubt. I think Nebraska used the same sort of stuff to get Yori to resign although I think NU was actively looking for an excuse to cut Yori loose.
Woof, just read through the whole lawsuit claims. Seriously, the fact she did not make the WNBA was because Bill had his friend cut her?
Crap like that just dilutes her case. She should have stuck to the real (alleged) issues.
The her side of the story (i.e. the lawsuit) should attempt to lay out the facts that this was the case.
The facts as laid out indicate two things to me: Ms. Moody was singled out for disparate treatment (Fennelly clearly didn't like her) and the 3 black seniors (Moody, Williamson and Ellis) were not treated like previous senior classes.
The latter claim seems more significant to me. But it is really only relevant if Williamson and Ellis felt the same way - AND there is evidence that the disparate treatment of seniors was specifically because of their race.
Woof, just read through the whole lawsuit claims. Seriously, the fact she did not make the WNBA was because Bill had his friend cut her?
Some hard to believe stuff in there. If a fraction proves to be true it will be super bad. Even if none is true Fennelly is likely finished IMHO. Based on history he isn't going to get much benefit of the doubt. I think Nebraska used the same sort of stuff to get Yori to resign although I think NU was actively looking for an excuse to cut Yori loose.