just realized isu will be picked to finish 8th or worse (preseason) 4 of 4 years

EvilBetty

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2012
1,386
1,537
113
under cfh (in all likelihood).

seems a safe bet the media expectation will be low once again next season as well considering we lose 5 of our top 8 players. only proven players returning will be ejim, niang and gibson. really can't see the media giving us much of a shot next season. regardless of what we think, the media isn't going to give any credit to incoming freshmen and transfers at isu until they prove themselves. that only happens at KU.

just another year cfh will have to prove them wrong. it surprised me to think we were picked 8th this season with the group of SR's we had coming back. lot can happen between now and seasons end, but i cannot believe with a down big 12 we end up in the bottom half this season.

not that the the media's opinions really mean crap.

tough to predict next year's lineup.
 

Clonefan17

New Member
Dec 28, 2012
12
0
1
We're always under rated. I quit looking at our preseason projections a while back the "experts" never respect us.
 

CysRage

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2009
13,114
8,086
113
ISU never gets respect. Just ask the 2000-01 team. I believe we were picked to finish 7th that year. We won the conference...
 

EvilBetty

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2012
1,386
1,537
113
wonder what our highest preseason projection has ever been...anybody...?
 

EvilBetty

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2012
1,386
1,537
113
Next year will be tough imo.

i'm thinking that too, but the transfer experiment has worked in cfh's favor so far. perhaps next season will be no different. there will be a better mix of transfers, proven players, and highly touted underclassmen next season. hope they keep the energy rolling.
 

State43

Well-Known Member
Nov 22, 2010
17,195
3,513
113
Omaha, NE
Thomas will get respect as a freshman. Morris probably wont and the Jucos definately wont with the exception of maybe Hogue. Yeah, we will get picked 6th or 7th next season. Remember, KSU, OSU & OU lose some quality players. Wouldn't be surprised to see Austin leave BU after this season leaving them down as well. I am not too worried about next season tbo. Out of conference will be a lot like this year I think. We will lose to quality opponents and beat lesser ones. Start clicking much more come conference play.
 

BuffettClone

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2012
2,586
1,856
113
I never pay much attention to what the "experts" say about ISU preseason. Cyclones never get respect until they've proven everybody else wrong
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
67,737
54,924
113
LA LA Land
Picking us 8th this year was completely stupid. It's saying that five teams would pass ISU from last year. It's saying that true freshman and transfers for OK State, OU, KState, Baylor and Texas were all locks to be productive players but transfers who lead the MWC conference in scoring and hit big shots in Final Fours are high risk gambles. It's saying quite a few true freshman ranked below Niang were a safer bet to contribute than Niang. It's saying empty gyms in towns where people don't even like college basketball and ignore their teams are more of an advantage than Hilton.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CycloneErik

IcSyU

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2007
27,757
5,950
113
Rochester, MN
Look at what we returned for this year and justify why we should've been higher than 8th. We lost a TON from last season. On paper, 8th made sense. What happens between the preseason poll and the actual games is another story.
 
D

DistrictCyclone

Guest
Lots of teams lose a lot of players and still get picked to do well based on the quality of their incoming recruits. Don't we still have a recruiting class rated in the top 20?

Besides, I'd much rather have expectations set low, play games where we don't have as big of a target on our back, and surprise everyone than be picked to finish near the top and then fall from grace a la Kentucky.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
67,737
54,924
113
LA LA Land
Lots of teams lose a lot of players and still get picked to do well based on the quality of their incoming recruits. Don't we still have a recruiting class rated in the top 20?

Besides, I'd much rather have expectations set low, play games where we don't have as big of a target on our back, and surprise everyone than be picked to finish near the top and then fall from grace a la Kentucky.

People on this board defended KSU, Baylor, OU, and OSU all leap frogging us because of the awesome recruits and transfers they had coming in.

So far I don't see how any of them are better than Niang, Clyburn and KL. Clyburn was the lowest risk newcomer in the entire Big 12 based on his MWC stats. Ejim, Babb and McGee have also shown they're a similar or better returning core than the teams picked to leapfrog us. We returned what turned out to be the conferences top rebounder, a top defender, top 3 point shooter.
 

Rural

Well-Known Member
Feb 3, 2010
39,273
29,683
113
I don't know how you can conclude that next year will be "tough" when the springtime game of basketball player musical chairs hasn't even happened yet.
 

awd4cy

Well-Known Member
Dec 29, 2010
26,291
17,880
113
Central Iowa
I still think next year is going to be a good season. I think it even has potential to start out like this season.
 

psyclone51

Active Member
Nov 6, 2011
837
562
43
Quit whining. We lost 3 very good starters last year and something like 60% of our scoring. We lost a first round draft pick. There were lots of questions of how the new transfers would do, and the freshmen. I think most fans had bought into FH as a great coach to feel more confident than 'non-Cylcone fans" so I can't get too worked up. As long as we deliver on the floor, that's all I care about.

And while I am not always impressed by Cyclone coverage in the Register, the column today speaks volumes about where our program is going:

http://blogs.desmoinesregister.com/...aa-tourney-big-picture/article?nclick_check=1

So quityurbitchin and enjoy the games.