How far has Lance Armstrong fallen?

jay moe

Well-Known Member
Apr 10, 2006
3,672
837
113
55
southern iowa
Not surprising, he never denied taking PED's, just said he's never tested positive, there's a big difference.
 

ty4cy90

Active Member
Apr 27, 2010
970
40
28
34
Ames/Spirit Lake
There's a pretty crazy stat though that out of the last like 20 tour de france winners, 17 have been vacated due to doping. That's not the exact stat, I just remember one of my cyclists friends telling me that a while back.
 

nrg4isu

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 29, 2009
2,730
4,737
113
Springfield, Illinois
He's got further yet to fall. I predict Trek/Bontrager will disown him soon too.

My big question about lance is what is he going to do with himself now? He seems too driven to just fade into the shadows. He seems to like the spotlight.
 

redrocket22

Member
Aug 24, 2011
234
6
18
Col de la Madone
I'm guessing he will still get some funds from Nike, Trek, etc. Nike specifically said they will still sponser LAF. LAF will still probably sponsor a cycling team as part of their cancer awareness spending. The cycling team will likely pay him for consulting. Pretty easy for the corporate folks to wash their hands of him but still take care of him. Livestrong is a huge seller for Nike so Nike will still want to keep that going. Until LAF says specifically that no funds or $XXX funds were paid to Lance you can assume he is still getting a cut.
 

VeloClone

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
48,462
39,268
113
Brooklyn Park, MN
There's a pretty crazy stat though that out of the last like 20 tour de france winners, 17 have been vacated due to doping. That's not the exact stat, I just remember one of my cyclists friends telling me that a while back.

I'm only aware of 9: Armstrong (7), Contador, Landis.

Now several others have been kicked out of a Tour while it was going on so didn't win it and still others who placed high (pun intended) had their high finishes stripped after the fact (Ulrich 3rd place, 2005, for example). A few were kicked out while wearing yellow like Michael Rasmussen in 2007. (He didn't test positive but was caught lying about his whereabouts earlier in the year and it was thought he was seeing a known "dope doctor". His team actually withdrew him from the race before he was banned.)
 

VeloClone

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
48,462
39,268
113
Brooklyn Park, MN
I'm guessing he will still get some funds from Nike, Trek, etc. Nike specifically said they will still sponser LAF. LAF will still probably sponsor a cycling team as part of their cancer awareness spending. The cycling team will likely pay him for consulting. Pretty easy for the corporate folks to wash their hands of him but still take care of him. Livestrong is a huge seller for Nike so Nike will still want to keep that going. Until LAF says specifically that no funds or $XXX funds were paid to Lance you can assume he is still getting a cut.

The cycling team will get in a lot of trouble hiring, in any capacity, an individual who is banned by UCI if I remember correctly.
 

Turn2

Well-Known Member
May 12, 2011
22,649
27,047
113
Clusterfunkeny
I'm only aware of 9: Armstrong (7), Contador, Landis.

Now several others have been kicked out of a Tour while it was going on so didn't win it and still others who placed high (pun intended) had their high finishes stripped after the fact (Ulrich 3rd place, 2005, for example). A few were kicked out while wearing yellow like Michael Rasmussen in 2007. (He didn't test positive but was caught lying about his whereabouts earlier in the year and it was thought he was seeing a known "dope doctor". His team actually withdrew him from the race before he was banned.)

You really think Riis and Pantani weren't doping?
 

VeloClone

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
48,462
39,268
113
Brooklyn Park, MN
You really think Riis and Pantani weren't doping?

I didn't say that and I don't think that. He said that he heard "17 of the last 20 Tour wins have been vacated due to doping". I believe the Tour organizers confirmed Riis' win but put an asterisk on it. They didn't vacate it but rather let him keep it. He, by the way, doesn't consider himself the Tour winner. Pantani's win was never vacated as far as I know even though he clearly was a drug user, not just performance enhancing drugs either.
 

Turn2

Well-Known Member
May 12, 2011
22,649
27,047
113
Clusterfunkeny
I didn't say that and I don't think that. He said that he heard "17 of the last 20 Tour wins have been vacated due to doping". I believe the Tour organizers confirmed Riis' win but put an asterisk on it. They didn't vacate it but rather let him keep it. He, by the way, doesn't consider himself the Tour winner. Pantani's win was never vacated as far as I know even though he clearly was a drug user, not just performance enhancing drugs either.

Maybe not 17 of the last 20, but I believe now the entire top 10 from '99 have been implicated.
 

VeloClone

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
48,462
39,268
113
Brooklyn Park, MN
Maybe not 17 of the last 20, but I believe now the entire top 10 from '99 have been implicated.


Great; good to know. But that still has nothing to do with my post. He was talking about Tour victories vacated. I gave him the best information I had on the matter. You have different information about other riders who didn't finish first or didn't have their victory vacated. That is good information, too.

Here is some other good information. The Tour organizers are saying that all 7 of Lance's vacated wins will officially have no winner.
 

Mr Janny

Welcome to the Office of Secret Intelligence
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
Mar 27, 2006
42,744
33,765
113
He's a scumbag who did some good things away from the sport. The things that he supposedly stood for, perseverance, hard work, strength have been tainted. Add in the fact that the reports have him not only being a willing participant, but being a ringleader, and insisting that other team members dope as well, and he's even more of a scumbag. Scumbags can do good things, but they're still scumbags.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyfanatic

Angie

Tugboats and arson.
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 27, 2006
28,598
13,599
113
IA
He's a scumbag who did some good things away from the sport. The things that he supposedly stood for, perseverance, hard work, strength have been tainted. Add in the fact that the reports have him not only being a willing participant, but being a ringleader, and insisting that other team members dope as well, and he's even more of a scumbag. Scumbags can do good things, but they're still scumbags.

Especially when the good things they do are still largely in their own self-interest.
 

GrindingAway

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 27, 2006
5,461
3,462
113
I don't know I mean Sheryl Crow was hot, but Anna Hansen isn't bad.

(Wait do people actually care about cycling - I mean I had a moderate interest back when some American was destroying everyone else, but now that that's over...meh.)
 

fatkid1974

Well-Known Member
Apr 3, 2010
1,317
102
63
51
van down by the river
He's got further yet to fall. I predict Trek/Bontrager will disown him soon too.

My big question about lance is what is he going to do with himself now? He seems too driven to just fade into the shadows. He seems to like the spotlight.

He'll come to Iowa every year for RAGBRAI and people will fall all over themselves to get a picture of him.
 

cyclone13

Well-Known Member
Apr 7, 2009
3,335
1,220
113
Lance Armstrong and Livestrong | Lance Armstrong | OutsideOnline.com

"Equally interesting is what the foundation doesn’t do. Most people—including nearly everybody I surveyed while reporting this story—assume that Livestrong funnels large amounts of money into cancer research. Nope. The foundation gave out a total of $20 million in research grants between 1998 and 2005, the year it began phasing out its support of hard science. A note on the foundation’s website informs visitors that, as of 2010, it no longer even accepts research proposals"