NY Post says West Virginia to the Big 12

Cyclophile1

Well-Known Member
Dec 14, 2009
1,910
120
48
Overland Park, KS
I am not bashing ND at all - I would love it. I personally think that BCS teams should be forced to play ONLY BCS teams in the non-con. I HATE games like Texas/Middle western technical institute. I actually like seeing competition.
I am just pointing out that if the big 12 did do this - it would FORCE 6 of the 10/9 teams to play a tough non-con game every year.

First, there are going to 12 teams and eventually 14 in all likelihood.

Every single one of them SHOULD want to play Notre Dame under any circumstance. Even if you lose, you win. Throw in the fact that they are the ultimate paper tiger the last dozen years, and it's potentially GREAT.

Notre Dame will be the one that never allows it, because they would never suffer a loss to ISU or K-State. They can deal with a loss to OU or Texas, but never ISU.
 

Cyclophile1

Well-Known Member
Dec 14, 2009
1,910
120
48
Overland Park, KS
Question: Why (according to Chip) would ND want to join the B12 as a full member after YEARS of rebuffing offers from the Big 10 and the Big East? This just doesn't add up.

Take WVU for next year (either paying or blowing up the Big East) and add L-ville and somebody else for 2013. Don't mess with Notre Dame.

And not to get off topic, but there really isn't ANY carrot that could entice Missouri now. We want the SEC. We don't want the B1G (despite what you've read, a B1G move would be met with the same reaction as staying in the Big 12). Nobody here is really in a position to judge the "rationality" of the move.

Focus on the teams that want to be here. (I'm not sure if that means WVU or not)

Because they would have their cake and be able to eat it too, primarily. That's the Notre Dame way - we are so elite that we get special treatment. Those days are slowly unraveling on them and the Big12 is positioning itself to catch them should that day come.

They want "independence" but they need a place to park their olympic sports and it's either this or the Catholic League for Wayward Boys and Girls, which they really don't want. I could also see them going for the ACC under certain scenarios as well.

With each passing day and the more information gets out, the more foolish and rash MU looks.
 

Cyclophile1

Well-Known Member
Dec 14, 2009
1,910
120
48
Overland Park, KS
Isn't that pretty much the same deal they have now with the Big10? I don't consider them a member of that league.

The only ways that ND works is either full membership, or BYU for football and ND for everything else. Partial football membership should not be an option. I think the BYU/ND option could work if it is understood that it would lead to full membership for each in the future (2015-2016).

Michigan, Michigan State and Purdue are the BigTen traditional games. I think they have also played USC, Stanford, Navy and Pitt annually for a long time.
 

Win5002

Well-Known Member
Apr 20, 2010
2,574
-2,137
63
ND played South Florida for the exposure in FLORIDA, I don't really think they are that worried about exposure in Iowa.

I'm not a fan of the league extending ND all sports other than football but if it helps the value of the TV contracts and in some way makes it more likely for Texas & OU to stay we pretty much have to be for it.
 

Mizzoulander

Member
Sep 28, 2011
643
16
18
Because they would have their cake and be able to eat it too, primarily. That's the Notre Dame way - we are so elite that we get special treatment. Those days are slowly unraveling on them and the Big12 is positioning itself to catch them should that day come.

They want "independence" but they need a place to park their olympic sports and it's either this or the Catholic League for Wayward Boys and Girls, which they really don't want. I could also see them going for the ACC under certain scenarios as well.

With each passing day and the more information gets out, the more foolish and rash MU looks.

Absolutely...and they'll get what they want. They have a open B1G invite, while the Big East was willing to take them WITHOUT football. Now that the BE might not have football much longer, they're shopping around. They'll get at least as good of a deal as they have now.

I don't think ND to the Big 12 amounts to anything. But it is kind of interesting:

If this deal were going down in the B1G, ND AD Swarbrick would be dealing with Delaney. In the Pac 12, it would be Larry Scott. In the SEC, it would be Slive.

In the Big 12, who's doing the legwork on negotiation with ND? DeLoss Dodds. I know, I know...they're old friends. Good thing you can count on Dodds to act in the best interests of the Big 12...every time.

Shouldn't this be something the conference commissioner is leading?
 

bosco

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2008
9,843
7,730
113
Des Moines
We want the SEC. We don't want the B1G

That's because the SEC is the new shiny toy and MU fans realize a BIG invite is not going to happen.

Absolutely...and they'll get what they want. They have a open B1G invite, while the Big East was willing to take them WITHOUT football. Now that the BE might not have football much longer, they're shopping around. They'll get at least as good of a deal as they have now.

I don't think ND to the Big 12 amounts to anything. But it is kind of interesting:

If this deal were going down in the B1G, ND AD Swarbrick would be dealing with Delaney. In the Pac 12, it would be Larry Scott. In the SEC, it would be Slive.

In the Big 12, who's doing the legwork on negotiation with ND? DeLoss Dodds. I know, I know...they're old friends. Good thing you can count on Dodds to act in the best interests of the Big 12...every time.

Shouldn't this be something the conference commissioner is leading?

How do you know it isn't the conference commissioner doing it? Do you have an inside source?

Speaking of inside sources Bob Fescoe says the reason there is a delay it's because SEC doesn't have the votes yet to accept MU.
 

Mumbai1986

Well-Known Member
Mar 9, 2008
3,530
29
48
Arlington, VA
Whatever Missouri is going to end up doing should mean nothing. The Big 12 needs to be proactive and get these schools. Admit WVU, Louisville, and Cincinnati from the Big East. If the Notre Dame rumors are credible, go after the Irish hard. With all this conference expansion, I doubt their independent status is going to last much longer.If we want to expand to 16 and be the first "super conference" go after Rutgers and Uconn. It makes no sense geographically, but it destroys the Big East, and stops the ACC and the BIG from expanding. Also, if Missouri leaves and we are trying for 16 teams, let's go after Houston. Decent football team, not that great of basketball, but they did have phi slamma jamma in the 80's!
 

kberyldial

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2006
1,265
58
48
Notre Dame's tv contract with NBC expires in 2015. If they don't sniff a BCS bowl in that time don't expect NBC to roll it out again. Ebersol is gone and they will likely turn over Kelly in this time frame. They will have to seriously consider the Big 10 as the Big East implodes. I guarantee you they will not join any other conference in football. Never. They will limp along in the Big East for the other sports as long as need be. The games against the service academies are as outdated as your grandfather and they can't even win them on a consistent basis. Times will change for them like everyone else but I don't think it will ever be in the Big 12.
 

CrossCyed

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2006
10,875
2,342
113
.__226_300_1276550720_sm.jpg
 

kberyldial

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2006
1,265
58
48
We are very fortunate right now. The Big East going away actually stabilizes everything once their football schools land in the ACC and Big 12. Alot of teams get swept to the side (S. Florida, etc.), but ISU made it.
 

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,401
73,951
113
Ankeny
MitchVingle Mitch Vingle
Confirmed. WVU to Big 12 is a done deal. There will be a press conference with the Big 12 folks tomorrow. The long wait/mess is over...

(Mitch Vingle is the Charleston (WV) Gazette sports editor)
 

jbhtexas

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2006
14,321
4,370
113
Arlington, TX
It is farther from Ames to Austin than it is from Ames to Morgantown.

That's not the point.

ISU doesn't travel the distance from Ames to Austin for every single away conference game for every sport. There are conference teams much closer. The trips to Kansas are about 400 miles. The trips to OK are about 600 miles.

The minimum distance that WVU will be traveling for conference games in the Big 12 would be 850 to Ames. The trips to KS will be 900 miles, the trips to OK will be 1000 miles, and the trips to TX will be 1,200 miles. It's a ridiculous waste of time and resources, but it looks like a done deal.
 
Last edited:

Die4Cy

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2010
14,972
15,857
113
That's not the point.

ISU doesn't travel the distance from Ames to Austin for every single away conference game for every sport. There are conference teams much closer. The trips to Kansas are about 400 miles. The trips to OK are about 600 miles.

The minimum distance that WVU will be traveling for conference games in the Big 12 would be 850 to Ames. The trips to KS will be 900 miles, the trips to OK will be 1000 miles, and the trips to TX will be 1,200 miles. It's ridiculous...

The distance thing for the student athletes is somewhat overrated. If you are putting the kids on a plane, 800 or 1000 miles is of little difference. But it would be a huge deal for traveling contingents of fans.
 

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,401
73,951
113
Ankeny
That's not the point.

ISU doesn't travel the distance from Ames to Austin for every single away conference game for every sport. There are conference teams much closer. The trips to Kansas are about 400 miles. The trips to OK are about 600 miles.

The minimum distance that WVU will be traveling for conference games in the Big 12 would be 850 to Ames. The trips to KS will be 900 miles, the trips to OK will be 1000 miles, and the trips to TX will be 1,200 miles. It's ridiculous...

But what's the alternative for them? The big east will probably no longer be a BCS conference in a few years even if they stay. Even if they do, the travel is about to go way up with some of the schools they were talking about inviting (boise, air force, houston, etc.. travel was\is about to go WAY up in the big east). Theyre never going to get an ACC invite (they dont fit the ACC profile), the SEC is done expanding with Mizzou, And the big 10 has zero interest either. We are the only option they really have.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron