No, they shouldn't. AHS will provide a better home court advantage for ISU than Wells Fargo.
What about 2000 in 2000 seat hs gym... vs. 4-6000 in a 7000 capacity Knapp Center if available?
No, they shouldn't. AHS will provide a better home court advantage for ISU than Wells Fargo.
No, they shouldn't. AHS will provide a better home court advantage for ISU than Wells Fargo.
This. One of the main reasons the Nebraska/ISU match was so heavily attended was because it was right after a football game, IIRC, which made it easy for a lot of people just to mingle over to Hilton. If it were at WFA, don't expect many people to make that drive to watch a VB match, no offense.No, they shouldn't. AHS will provide a better home court advantage for ISU than Wells Fargo.
Bottom line - playing at Ames High will result in a huge financial hit for the volleyball program. Fewer students, and much lower attendance. If the Neb match is indeed held there, we are losing thousands of $$ in ticket sales.
We have to protect Hilton better than this - someway or somehow. Or else rebuild it at another location (with FEMA funds, like Iowa is doing with Hancher). This is very damaging...
No, they shouldn't. AHS will provide a better home court advantage for ISU than Wells Fargo.
I can already picture the 3,000 seat Tornado man Olympic Sports complex. Get on it. :wink:Bottom line - playing at Ames High will result in a huge financial hit for the volleyball program. Fewer students, and much lower attendance. If the Neb match is indeed held there, we are losing thousands of $$ in ticket sales.
We have to protect Hilton better than this - someway or somehow. Or else rebuild it at another location (with FEMA funds, like Iowa is doing with Hancher). This is very damaging...
It is? Its a dump that needs a ton of work before it would be ready for anything. I'd actually guess it will be one of the next buildings on campus either completely gutted or knocked down and replaced.The Armory is available.....
After '93 there was a plan made to make sure Hilton was not flooded again. However, the plan was not followed.
VB tickets were next to nothing anyway. Hell, most of the time you could get in free. They won't be losing that much in ticket $.
What was the plan? More sandbags? A moat? Technically you can 'flood proof' a building but its not easy with an existing structure. Maybe not even possible with this one.
What was the plan? More sandbags? A moat? Technically you can 'flood proof' a building but its not easy with an existing structure. Maybe not even possible with this one.
What was the plan? More sandbags? A moat? Technically you can 'flood proof' a building but its not easy with an existing structure. Maybe not even possible with this one.
It would take a TON of water to get up the block to Beach. Last week, It barely got the CY Stephens, and it was WAY out. It didn't get to the cutout for the turning lane on Lincoln Way, so it had a ways to go. Lincoln Way had about a foot of water over it if I'm not mistaken, but that's putting the stuff around it at 6+ feet of water because the road is raised a bunch.I'm not engineer, but it just doesn't seem like it would be all that hard to levy around Hilton. Down the south side of Lincoln way, along the west side of University and along the north side of the road that runs between the main lots and Hilton/C.Y's.
There's already an incline to the west and has the water ever reached Beach? How high would it need to be? IE, how high does the water get over Lincoln Way and University? A couple feet?
Of course you'd lose the two tunnels.
I heard on the news that Maple-Willow-Larch had flood gates or doors that were in place that kept water out of there. Couldn't that be done around the low doors at Hilton?