Wow! I was merely just trying to state we don't give hawks fans the satisfaction that we are talking about them. Yes that was my first post I had registered last year and then kind of got away from it, after hearing Chris on the radio recently I came back. I guess that was my mistake. Sorry.
What is with the DMR comments?
- Thread starter Frak
- Start date
Wow! I was merely just trying to state we don't give hawks fans the satisfaction that we are talking about them. Yes that was my first post I had registered last year and then kind of got away from it, after hearing Chris on the radio recently I came back. I guess that was my mistake. Sorry.
If you're offended by my post, I have an open seat on my therapy bed for you to work it out.
Message boards are more of a place to comment back and forth about ISU-Iowa stuff. It annoys the heck out of me when inflamatory comments are made under articles on the news sites. For as little attention ISU gets in general, I dont see why some of the hawk fans feel threatened by the news anyway. However I do see it done on both sides.
I am not offended, I don't even know you. From one cyclone fan to another I guess I was just caught off guard. I did not expect to get lambasted by fellow clone fans.
If the question is "What's up with the comments on DMR articles"? The answer is that it's the Rag's pathetic attempt to get more readers. The mouth-breather hawk fans flame on after an ISU story and we talk about it here and hopefully for the DMR some of us go to rubber-neck at the disaster that is a hawk fans analysis of ISU athletics. I used to do it too. In fact, I used to pay for the DMR but I'm done. Why get my ISU news from the Rag when I can get it quicker and better here?
I sent you a subscription to the SC Journal for Christmas. I hope you will enjoy it.:wink:
Ok, lets not go there.
Is this with the source considered? Just sayin'.
Pure love, Cycloin!
Is this true? That's what I'm trying to figure out. He could be my coffee cup. I don't know....yet.....
