When unable to debate factually....fall back on grammar.
It's just tough to believe you know more about the Hawks than anyone here when you continually spell his name wrong.
When unable to debate factually....fall back on grammar.
4 assists and 0 turnovers works for me. His defense is fine.
You're triggered, plain and simple. And just a thought, maybe keep the politics out.I'm not triggered at all. I enjoy reading poster's thoughts on Iowa. It's hilarious to me how many people on here openly admit to not watching Iowa play but then still go on to tell you who is a good player and who is not. It's pure entertainment. Much like Fox News.
I'm ready to learn about this advanced statistic you were telling us about that measures a players defense when he's an on the ball defender vs an off the ball defender. Can you provide that please?
Except I don’t think they look good at all. TTU I was surprised by but that was more them looking young and shooting terrible too as opposed to Iowa looking good
Phonetics/grammar...same difference(When trying to clap back at someone and thinking grammar and spelling have interchangeable definitions.)
They didn’t teach you English during your semester at Kirkwood, did they?Phonetics/grammar...same difference
Lol...There is no stat that measures end of game situations. That's the flaw in what you posted.Bump for @Gitwitit
Lol...There is no stat that measures end of game situations. That's the flaw in what you posted.
Joe and Connor 6 assists 1 turnover. Strange you left that out when talking about pg’sIowa's "point guards"
Bohannon - 6-15 from the floor, 1 assist and 1 rebound
Connor - 2-6 from the floor, 1-4 from 3
Toussaint - 2-7 from the floor, 0-4 from 3
Yikes!
"Grammar" is a pretty vague term though; in fact, phonology (the study of the sound systems of languages) is apparently considered part of its scopeLOL no.
He cherry picks all the time. At least he admitted he didn't watch much of the game. That's more than most here are will to admit.Joe and Connor 6 assists 1 turnover. Strange you left that out when talking about pg’s
Phonetics/grammar...same difference
You said there is a stat showing moss is a better defender. I said I want to see the same stat for end of game situations. Connor was just more effective in late game situations when trying to protect a lead. If behind, Moss was needed for scoring. It's simple.I never said there was a statistic that measured end of game situations.
YOU said there was a stat that showed Moss was a good defender off the ball but a bad defender on the ball. I'm waiting to see that from you unless you want to just admit you made it up
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PhoneticsWTF is phonetics? Is this another one of your advanced statistics, but this time you are using it for "phonics"?
I watched the second half. The game ended up almost exactly as I expected it to. A $20 straight win with parlaying the under paid out $97.He cherry picks all the time. At least he admitted he didn't watch much of the game. That's more than most here are will to admit.
Why is your posting history locked? What are you afraid for people to see?He cherry picks all the time. At least he admitted he didn't watch much of the game. That's more than most here are will to admit.
Joe and Connor 6 assists 1 turnover. Strange you left that out when talking about pg’s