I wouldn't be so sure. The tournament committee sometimes seems to have in their minds that the B1G needs X number of teams in the tourney, even if only 4 or 5 might be the only ones deserving. As much as it makes me want to puke, Iowa may find themselves around that cut line in B1G standings. I really hope not.He is a great shooter. You have to consider degree of difficulty on his 3 point shots. Finally, Iowa’s chance for NCAA tournament is dead.
Check Cyclone06's post (the one right before you posted). That is your answer. They may also throw in stuff about how amazing Brock Harding looked in the first half & how the future is bright with Freeman and him.How are Chad and Eick gonna spin this one?
4 or more of the 9-11 seeds could be big 10.I wouldn't be so sure. The tournament committee sometimes seems to have in their minds that the B1G needs X number of teams in the tourney, even if only 4 or 5 might be the only ones deserving. As much as it makes me want to puke, Iowa may find themselves around that cut line in B1G standings. I really hope not.
Hassell has been so confident talking about Iowa recently that he basically has me convinced that they're playing well enough to make a run. Thing is I haven't watched them play in a while. When I saw them against us and into January I really felt like they just weren't very good. Has something changed? From perusing box scores I can see that Dix has really been lighting it up. Has a switched flipped for him and he's transformed into a real difference maker or is he just hot? Is that it?
Or are out three starters (NW). Or an opponent's best player goes down with an injury at halftime (MN)They look good till the play a team that plays defense is my guess.
Iowa has no resume. They have a ton of really soft wins.Yep, there's no way they get in with 14 losses and no signature wins. Best wins are Wisconsin and Michigan State??? That's a TURRABLE resume.
If they’re going to get into the tourney (I’m not sold at this point), play up to a 9 seed so they can play Houston. That would be enjoyable.
At 9:20 Eikholt hasn’t tweeted about the men at all, but had 5 tweets about the women in the last half hour. Chadster’s last tweet was about the men cutting the lead to six, nothing since.They don’t post much about the men tbh.
Iowa is unfazed by pathetically weak defense because the guy who gets beat absolutely salivates at the opportunity to run down to the opposite end of the floor and get an open shot for themselves. They are so conditioned to this that it is hard to break out of that habit even when the game dictates that giving up any more points will seal a loss for your team.This is completely pathetic. He’s already playing off him by several feet because his strategy is to give him a three or long 2 instead of a blow by. And he still gives up the blow by.
You can see immediately turns around and is looking for the ball so he can hoist another three in transition.Iowa is unfazed by pathetically weak defense because the guy who gets beat absolutely salivates at the opportunity to run down to the opposite end of the floor and get an open shot for themselves. They are so conditioned to this that it is hard to break out of that habit even when the game dictates that giving up any more points will seal a loss for your team.
Their best possible path in B1G tourney is Ohio State (60 NET), Illinois (16 NET), Nebraska (40 NET), and Purdue (2 NET). If they got to championship and lost, it would be 2 Quad 1 wins. That might be enough.Short of Iowa winning the B1G tournament…. no way they get in, right?
NONE of those should make it unless they get to 20 or more wins. Even at 20 wins, it is PIG or off the bubble. Really need 21 or more, which means 3 wins in conf tourney or bust for all of them (I know OSU has 19 but they have fewer conf regular season wins so they need 3 also).I'll go so far as to say that between the following teams: Indiana, Iowa, Michigan St, Ohio St & Minnesota.....at least TWO of those teams will make the tournament, maybe even three.