OU ain’t AAU. Texas is possible.
If sh*t is going nuclear, I'm thinking the AAU thing might be malleable. But UT would probably be the priority out of the two if any of that were to happen.
OU ain’t AAU. Texas is possible.
Texas is a cancer. I think I’d rather Pac 12 than big ten if Texas was there.If sh*t is going nuclear, I'm thinking the AAU thing might be malleable. But UT would probably be the priority out of the two if any of that were to happen.
Texas is a cancer. I think I’d rather Pac 12 than big ten if Texas was there.
Then go looking to change conferences and cause chaos there.SEC or B1G, I think it'd be fun to watch them try to be the Kardashian and then be told to go clean the bathroom.
Aside from Hoch resistance, ISU has a lot to offer the B1GI really think ISU has a lot going for it.... and the fact they have a wrestling program is probably more important than a lot of people think.
OU ain’t AAU. Texas is possible.
No it would be a partial answer if the BIG were to add ISU and KU. A further answer might be to go to 18 teams and add WV and perhaps UCF? Now you have more fans, more overall interest in your conference, and a Florida footprint.And if they are in an arms race with the SEC would Kansas and Iowa State be an answer to Oklahoma and Texas?
The Big Ten is a dream for us.
In the middle of their foot print. Still better academics than OU.ND isn’t AAU and the B1G would bend over backwards to let them in.
I hate 11 am games but if that is what keeps us P5, I’m done complaining about them.
If we wound up in the PAC, wouldn't any TV schedule be up to the PAC and the TV contract? It would benefit what the PAC would want for a Midwest footprint I would think.What if we played at 1:00 which would be 11 out there.
Who knows? If the SEC expands, the B1G might want to keep up with the Jones.
Now you're talking nation-wide Armageddon. I hope you are wrong, but fear you might be right.Sure, however they won’t just add ISU. They’ll look at ND/UVA/UNC/GT from the ACC, and/or the PAC schools first. If they can’t work those, then they have a history of being patient, otherwise might go for a Mizzou + KU package. ISU doesn’t get in unless all of their other options aren’t feasible and they need to pair for a new team.
This. **** them both. I can’t wait to be there for Texas last game in Ames. I won’t be able to talk for a week from screaming so loud. I hope we beat the everliving sh*t out of them.
Sure, however they won’t just add ISU. They’ll look at ND/UVA/UNC/GT from the ACC, and/or the PAC schools first. If they can’t work those, then they have a history of being patient, otherwise might go for a Mizzou + KU package. ISU doesn’t get in unless all of their other options aren’t feasible and they need to pair for a new team.
I don't know. Maybe you go ahead and pay that if you think you may lose a few billion in the long run. Go to court or pay a fee to get UNC and Virginia's tv rights back.Anyone talking about the Big 10 raiding the ACC hasn't been paying attention. After Maryland left, their rights were all pledged to the conference until 2036 and they have something like a $50 million exit fee. I guess the Big 10 can add UNC and UVA if they don’t mind forking over $100 million to the ACC and not being able to televise any UNC or UVA games for the next 15 years.
I don't know. Maybe you go ahead and pay that if you think you may lose a few billion in the long run. Go to court or pay a fee to get UNC and Virginia's tv rights back.
Even it that means the end to ISU football as we know it?