Texas Tech 10 Million Dollar Portal Season

Nolaeer

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2012
763
935
93
if Texas Tech bought the best team money can buy over the next 5 years and won 3 national titles, would the sec leave them in the big 12 or poach them and send miss state our way?
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
25,998
23,771
113
10 years from now the haves and have nots in college athletics are going to look much different than today. The wealth of your alumni base is going to matter more than traditional powerhouses. Programs like BYU and SMU could go out and buy themselves relevancy that they once had. If Alabama starts losing, do the bandwagon fans find a new favorite team and leave that alumni base to try and fund a team that is used to having the highest paid roster for decades? It’s all going to be crazy and I don’t think it’ll necessarily be good for everyone at the top today.
 

Cyinthenorth

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 29, 2013
15,848
11,916
113
36
Dubuque
This is why I don't agree with the people ready to anoint McCasland as the next great coach in the sport. I'm sure he's good, but he's got pretty much any weapon at his disposal he could ever want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cychl82

cyfan92

Well-Known Member
Sep 20, 2011
8,167
13,018
113
Augusta National Golf Club
Provo has a 260 billion dollar endowment for the church and a billionaire professional sports team owner. Easily top 5 resources in the NCAA, if they wanted to win a championship.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cychl82

Al_4_State

Moderator
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 27, 2006
32,151
28,134
113
39
Driftless Region
Visit site
if Texas Tech bought the best team money can buy over the next 5 years and won 3 national titles, would the sec leave them in the big 12 or poach them and send miss state our way?
Why would the SEC add them when they have Texas and A&M? They're already getting TTU fan eyeballs hate watching those two without having to pay them anything.

It's not about whether or not the program is actually good.
 

BigLame

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2008
5,148
2,226
113
Western IA
"The head coach acknowledges Arizona State, BYU, Baylor and several more teams in their league are in good shape for 2025."

Someone missing here...
 

BWRhasnoAC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 10, 2013
29,485
27,171
113
Dez Moy Nez
"The head coach acknowledges Arizona State, BYU, Baylor and several more teams in their league are in good shape for 2025."

Someone missing here...
We lose some key pieces and are notorious for having less money. We could still be good but they're betting on regression.
 
Last edited:

CYdTracked

Well-Known Member
Mar 23, 2006
18,354
9,160
113
Grimes, IA
Not sure $10 mil is gonna buy you a natty. Ohio State reportedly spent $20 mil on their team this year and I am guessing that number only goes up with some schools that have donors willing to write big checks.
 

cykadelic2

Well-Known Member
Jun 10, 2006
3,852
1,608
113
Not sure $10 mil is gonna buy you a natty. Ohio State reportedly spent $20 mil on their team this year and I am guessing that number only goes up with some schools that have donors willing to write big checks.
As the ESPN article pointed out, Tech is front loading their collective Pay for Play deals so that they are paid in advance of the June 1st effective date of the House Settlement when every school is subject to the $20M AD RevShare cap and blatant Pay for Play deals from collectives and boosters will be mitigated.

And that $10M was for incoming players only, They probably spent a sizeable amount to retain several of their best players like Ohio St did.
 

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,027
7,630
113
Dubuque
if Texas Tech bought the best team money can buy over the next 5 years and won 3 national titles, would the sec leave them in the big 12 or poach them and send miss state our way?
Nope. As others have pointed out the SEC already has Texas, Texas A&M and Oklahoma to capture Longhorn state viewers.

I would bet that Tech is probably among a list of Big12 schools that the SEC would have zero interest because the school doesn't bring a new territory to the SEC footprint or is the "little brother" program in the state. Other Big12 schools would be K-State, Okie State, UCF, Baylor, TCU. TV eyes is more important than winning Ntnl titles.

IMO the schools the SEC are probably most interested in due to bringing a new populous territory are: KU, CU, Utah and ASU. Heck I feel Iowa State has a better chance getting into the SEC than TT because ISU would stretch the SEC into the upper Midwest and compliment schools like Mizzou, OU & KU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrShip

legi

Well-Known Member
Oct 31, 2008
2,273
1,677
113
Maple Grove, MN
As the ESPN article pointed out, Tech is front loading their collective Pay for Play deals so that they are paid in advance of the June 1st effective date of the House Settlement when every school is subject to the $20M AD RevShare cap and blatant Pay for Play deals from collectives and boosters will be mitigated.

And that $10M was for incoming players only, They probably spent a sizeable amount to retain several of their best players like Ohio St did.
How will this be mitigated? Who's gonna stop a booster paying money to a player in addition to RevShare?
 

CYCLNST8

Well-Known Member
Jul 19, 2008
11,315
13,405
113
Urbandale
www.gimikk.com
Countless programs dump money on players with mixed results. You still need to make the pieces fit. Development and scheme matter. It can be more difficult if you're dealing with a bunch of Prima Donna mercenaries. I like Campbell's formula. Find diamonds in the rough; build them up; then compensate them as fairly as possible to retain them. We may not be a consistent playoff contender with that recipe, but I bet we're a regular in the bowl season.
 

cykadelic2

Well-Known Member
Jun 10, 2006
3,852
1,608
113
How will this be mitigated? Who's gonna stop a booster paying money to a player in addition to RevShare?
"Deals affiliated with a booster, booster group or any entity deemed to be associated with the school are the only ones subject to the clearinghouse’s more rigorous fair market value standard."

This obviously won't stop all under the table unregistered BS but the framework is being put in place to enforce and mitigate obvious pay for play deals from boosters.

 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: NWICY

Nolaeer

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2012
763
935
93
Right. The House settlement is being pushed by bluebloods who dont want the Texas Techs, BYU's, or SMU's stealing their blue-chip players bc they have wealthier donors. The Beverly Hillbillies of Lubbock.

But, i dont think NIL deals can be stopped. Pay for play can be, but arch manning's 6 million in NIL is likely market value. he's famous. I just think collectives will actually have to start making commercials with the high-end guys they are paying.

the wild, wild west of NIL really hurts the blue bloods, so I like it.

I dont know how much NIL money WVU has. No one will say. They did say they outbid kansas for javon Small. That likely wasnt cheap. WVU also outbid Ole Miss for the AAC defensive player of the year, a 6=4 250 de who is fast enough to play outside backer too.
He had 10.5 sacks, 17 tfl, and over an 80 PFF grade against the run and pass rushing.
WVU also landed the best returning cover corner in the country. he was 3rd. the 2 ahead of him are headed to the NFL.

so, TT spent 10 million. other big 12 schools may have spent north of 5 as well.
 

CY74

Member
Oct 27, 2019
73
96
18
"Deals affiliated with a booster, booster group or any entity deemed to be associated with the school are the only ones subject to the clearinghouse’s more rigorous fair market value standard."

This obviously won't stop all under the table unregistered BS but the framework is being put in place to enforce and mitigate obvious pay for play deals from boosters.

Where does We Will Collective fit into this?
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron