sorry i'm bored so i'll just keep posting random things
02--30th
03--46th
04--42nd
05--58th
06--63rd
07--60th
08--62nd
09--73rd
10--currently 47th. However, our class is almost full and there are a LOT of teams who will pass us by simply putting bodies in their classes. i would predict an upper 50's low 60's finish.
the sad thing about these low class rankings is that the team has generally finished worse than the recruit rankings.
I like numbers so I did some math. It might be a bit ufzzy, but it sums up the recruiting classes from 2002 - 2009
Thie first number is the total stars of all kids in the class regardless of whether they showed up on campus or not.
The second number shows those that made it more than one year.
The third number is a sum of the number of stars of the kids that showed up and stayed two or more years. I counted JuCos who actually stayed their full two years in this number.
2002
74 total stars signed
45 total stars that made it more than one year
32 total stars that were around for 2 or more years
2003
64 total stars signed
53 more than one year
41 2 or more years
2004
69 total stars signed
36 more than one year
33 stayed 2 or more years
2005
68 total stars signed
47 more than one year
41 2 or more years
2006
75 total stars signed
41 more than one year
41 2 or mroe years
Chizik
2007
61 total stars signed
45 more than one year
38 2 or more years
2008
58 total stars signed
54 more than one year
50 2 or more years
Rhoads
2009
67 total stars signed
55 made it to campus and are still on the team
So, 2002 and 2004 were actually DMacs worst years if you look at those who were here 2 or more years. Which means the rankings mean diddly. Chiziks first year wasn't so good, but his second is full of starters.