Sometimes I realize AI has a ways to go before taking over the world

enisthemenace

Well-Known Member
Dec 5, 2009
13,952
10,147
113
Runnells, IA
I mean, it's not wrong and there are a fair number of people who don't know what bile is so maybe not too far. There is a lot of evidence we aren't getting any smarter as a society.
Don’t the studies, so far, indicate that we are getting dumber? Not just that we aren’t getting smarter, but actually less intelligent?

People are losing their ability to think critically, be creative, etc.
 

NorthCyd

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 22, 2011
21,099
35,577
113

VeloClone

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
48,401
39,186
113
Brooklyn Park, MN
It definitely has potential, but anyone who has played against AI in video games has an idea how limited it can be. I also wonder how AI's learning will be messed up by human interaction with it.
The other part of it is that AI has zero critical thinking. There is no "I" in the AI. It crawls the web for information on a subject and weights everything it finds equally. So while I might know to **** can some of the conspiracy theories out there (too bad the number of us who don't continues to grow), the AI bot pretty much gives them just as much creedence as theories with 50 years of scientific study backing them up.

Until there is real intelligence in AI, it is going to be only slightly more useful than a parlor trick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cyclonepride

NorthCyd

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 22, 2011
21,099
35,577
113
The other part of it is that AI has zero critical thinking. There is no "I" in the AI. It crawls the web for information on a subject and weights everything it finds equally. So while I might know to **** can some of the conspiracy theories out there (too bad the number of us who don't continues to grow), the AI bot pretty much gives them just as much creedence as theories with 50 years of scientific study backing them up.

Until there is real intelligence in AI, it is going to be only slightly more useful than a parlor trick.
I think you are selling the current version of AI a little short. Its capable of far more than you are giving it credit. For example...

 

gypsyroad

Active Member
Oct 24, 2023
87
190
33
I think you are selling the current version of AI a little short. Its capable of far more than you are giving it credit. For example...

I used ChatGPT this afternoon to write some code for me. It wasn't perfect, but it was close. Trimmed what I thought was going to take me four hours into 15 minutes.
 

VeloClone

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
48,401
39,186
113
Brooklyn Park, MN
I think you are selling the current version of AI a little short. Its capable of far more than you are giving it credit. For example...

Fair enough. That certainly isn't what we are getting sold as AI on the interwebs...

On another note:

'The robot could respond to spoken commands such as "grab the gallbladder head" or "move the left arm a bit to the left", and then learnt from its feedback.'

Learnt? Damned English destroying the English language...

:p
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,536
65,804
113
LA LA Land
The new films don't do a great job of coming right out and saying it, but the concept of Dune is basically that AI has to be banned across the universe...and this guy wrote this in the 1960s. Stunning foresight.

They have advanced machines but no thinking machines.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VeloClone

Cloneon

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2015
3,000
3,132
113
West Virginia
The other part of it is that AI has zero critical thinking. There is no "I" in the AI. It crawls the web for information on a subject and weights everything it finds equally. So while I might know to **** can some of the conspiracy theories out there (too bad the number of us who don't continues to grow), the AI bot pretty much gives them just as much creedence as theories with 50 years of scientific study backing them up.

Until there is real intelligence in AI, it is going to be only slightly more useful than a parlor trick.
There are so many factors that need to be considered. Most of them nefarious. And, just like the old computer adage: "stupid in, stupid out", AI is not immune to the same effect. Sadly, what we'll likely see is: bad people using AI to corrupt good data. The 'integrity' of data needs boundaries that can't be compromised. But, I've yet to hear anyone with guidelines to protect this essential piece. The person who comes up with a 'block-chain' concept for data, 'should' become famous. But, this flies in the face of the existing circular power structure. So expect resistance, or at the very least zero assistance.

I see AI today like what we used to say about computers' effect on the paper industry. The paper industry was predicted to fail. But, in fact, in flourished. Why? Because people spent a lot more time making things 'pretty', which had a consequential effect of a massive printing explosion. As someone who has dabbled in AI for decades and more recently immersively, I can say I'm NOT saving time. But, I soon will. And, regretfully, I've bypassed an entire industry of potential subcontractors to get the job done. I'm using AI for a binary objective; meaning what I aesthetically like, I keep. Put another way, it's not something which can be capitalized on by corrupting the data. So, there are areas that AI will have less resistance. We'll just have to wait and see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VeloClone