One thing that ticks me off on Socials.
Everyone saying ISU is only good because the "real b12 teams" or the "good teams" etc left. Then saying the "real b12" teams were OuT.
How the hell would anyone ever consider Texas, a "real b12" team. They were in it for themselves from day 1. Just like in the SWC, they were never a team player, fully invested in the conference and making it better. And then they were not some powerhouse besides last year for most of the recent history.
Thats like saying UT was only good because aTm left, or OU only because Nebby left. Or better yet because Missouri left. Like seriously what the ****.
I get what they are trying to imply, but when you look at it and say it that way its just stupid.
Look at the last decade+:
Nebby would be a bottom team in the B12.
atm would be an average team in the B12.
Mizzu would be an average team in the B12.
OU, was a top team then slid to Average, and would currently be an Average team in the B12.
UT, was an average team then made it to the top last year, and would be currently in the B12.