Ross Dellenger report on SEC spring meetings

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,222
24,107
113
A long but informative read:

(I kinda wonder who the anonymous B12 AD is)

https://sports.yahoo.com/college-fo...he-sec-its-going-to-get-heated-130018106.html

i feel more and more that this is going to end up getting ugly. I do hope that the NCAA holds their ground with the power they hold with sports outside of football. If the P2 want to split for football, just let them know their other sports will not be able to compete in the NCAA. While that could accelerate the end of the NCAA, it’s still better than this slow death that we’re in now.
 

F5cy

Well-Known Member
May 1, 2011
1,860
756
113
Washington, D.C.
What’s the TLDR version?
Here's Perplexity's "Executive Summary"


Bottom Line: College sports faces a pivotal moment with multiple crises converging at once - the SEC's spring meetings in Florida represent "the most consequential gathering in the history of the conference" as leaders grapple with playoff format battles, revenue sharing implementation, and potential NCAA breakaway scenarios.


Key Issues at Stake​


College Football Playoff Format Battle: The SEC and Big Ten are pushing a 16-team playoff format granting each conference four automatic qualifiers, twice as many as reserved for the ACC and Big 12 (two each). This has created intense opposition, with serious pushback from not only the ACC and Big 12 but from Notre Dame and some of the other FBS Group of Six conferences.


Big 12 Athletics Director Response: When asked about the potential SEC endorsement of this format, "I guess we're going to war," said one Big 12 athletic director. This quote captures the escalating tensions as the format battle has become "two (SEC and Big Ten) against at least four other conferences, plus Notre Dame".


Revenue Sharing Crisis: Schools are expected to distribute around $20 million each to their athletes next academic year, but less than 40 days before Division I athletic departments are scheduled to begin paying out what will be more than $1 billion to athletes next academic year, there is no decision in a consolidated antitrust settlement (House) that is supposed to usher in this revenue-sharing era.


NCAA Governance Upheaval: SEC presidents in March quietly authorized their commissioner, Sankey, to split from the NCAA if he deems that the right move. The proposed governance changes would grant power conferences as much as 65% in weighted voting power within rule-making committees.


Financial Desperation: Even the wealthiest conferences are seeking help - Big Ten administrators received presentations last week at their spring meetings from four firms jockeying to purchase a piece of the conference, while SEC officials are using Goldman Sachs to further examine the concept of private equity investment.


The article portrays an industry in unprecedented turmoil, with SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey warning that "if what's happening now just continues for years and years, you will quickly see a diminishment of the number of sports offered" without national standards to guide the transition to athlete compensation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigCyFan and CyTuT

Jer

CF Founder, Creator
Feb 28, 2006
23,570
23,355
10,030
Long but well worth the read, and I don’t usually like that long of article. Addresses directly many of the unknowns that each faction of fans seem to be all but certain, with none being close.

In reality, there is no good path forward. The guardrails some hoped would be put in place with revenue sharing are absolutely nonexistent and never going to happen, as the article addresses. I think that was always obvious, but understand people wanting to believe it could never happen.

In my mind, the changes of the past 10 years have had a fraction of the impact of those that are going to come in the next 2 years. The only question is will it be absolutely horrible or just blazingly horrible.

We have seen teams move conferences and money going in new directions, but the real fan impacts across all of college athletics are yet to come.
 

Jer

CF Founder, Creator
Feb 28, 2006
23,570
23,355
10,030
I like this mindset on our side
The problem though, like the article says, is we may have zero leverage, especially if the supposed memorandum eluded to is real. If all power was truly given to the Big 2 effective 2026 to keep them from breaking off, we ****** ourselves. It may have been the best option, but celibacy might have been preferred.
 

Kinch

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2021
5,651
5,751
113
It would be a shame if the media started to investigate Sankey, kinda like they did Gary Hart in 1988.
 

Fall Creek

Active Member
Oct 28, 2023
89
170
33
I don't see a positive end game for the SEC and Big 10 if they break away and stop playing the other conferences. If they want a slug fest every week with the other power schools then their spoiled fan bases are going to be frustrated with their average and subpar records.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigCyFan and Kinch

FarminCy

Well-Known Member
Nov 14, 2009
4,669
2,980
113
Nowhere and Everywhere
The SEC needs the Big 10 to make these plans viable. Without the Big 10 they are just a regional conference. Money is there now but if much of the country doesn’t have a team in the same system as SEC then the value and viewership erodes over time.

To me this is the SEC grabbing power now that some of their “elites” aren’t elite in the NIL race.

I may be way off and probably am. But this is also just another reason my interest in college sports get less by the year.
 

cykadelic2

Well-Known Member
Jun 10, 2006
3,912
1,670
113
This is all gonna get SO ugly


The ACC and B12 will both become more publicly vocal about the current state of affairs and the SEC/ESPN and B10/Fox bullying.

JP has already voiced his displeasure in recent weeks on at least two radio shows and a pod that I have listened to and the public shaming from others will likely grow which is sorely needed. ISU is JP’s last job so he doesn’t care about any backlash from Sankey or Pettiti.
 
Last edited:

cykadelic2

Well-Known Member
Jun 10, 2006
3,912
1,670
113
It's almost like building millions and millions of dollars worth of facilities all funded with future money was a bad idea...
The money is there to fund everything even with RevShare and everyone knows it with media rights aggregation. This is about ESPN and Fox wanting to minimize their payouts and maintain their control of the sport and will continue to use their Sankey and Pettiti puppets to carry out their mission.