Redskins = WFT = Commanders?

PickSix

Well-Known Member
Aug 25, 2013
782
1,232
93
I don’t understand what’s so bad about the name. Sure, it was a safe choice (as it probably should have been), but It fits the city, it’s tough, it’s original among major sports franchises, and fits in with other names in the league.

The jerseys on the other hand, are not great, but those’ll change with time like many other teams do. There’s lots of cool touches, such as the bars above and below “Commanders” that pay homage to the DC flag, or the dates on the crest that tie in the team’s history to the new brand, or the stars that appear on both the DC and U.S. flags. I think too many people already made their minds up that they weren’t going to like it before anything was released.
 

3TrueFans

Just a Happily Married Man
Sep 10, 2009
59,491
53,556
113
44
Ames
I don’t understand what’s so bad about the name. Sure, it was a safe choice (as it probably should have been), but It fits the city, it’s tough, it’s original among major sports franchises, and fits in with other names in the league.

The jerseys on the other hand, are not great, but those’ll change with time like many other teams do. There’s lots of cool touches, such as the bars above and below “Commanders” that pay homage to the DC flag, or the dates on the crest that tie in the team’s history to the new brand, or the stars that appear on both the DC and U.S. flags. I think too many people already made their minds up that they weren’t going to like it before anything was released.
People like to complain.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: drmwevr08

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
59,529
21,043
113
Macomb, MI
I don’t understand what’s so bad about the name. Sure, it was a safe choice (as it probably should have been), but It fits the city, it’s tough, it’s original among major sports franchises, and fits in with other names in the league.

The jerseys on the other hand, are not great, but those’ll change with time like many other teams do. There’s lots of cool touches, such as the bars above and below “Commanders” that pay homage to the DC flag, or the dates on the crest that tie in the team’s history to the new brand, or the stars that appear on both the DC and U.S. flags. I think too many people already made their minds up that they weren’t going to like it before anything was released.

There’s nothing inherently bad about it; it’s just “meh”, especially when there were better options thrown around, like Red Tails or Red Hogs.

Then again, it fits the theme of “meh” names for Washington teams: Nationals, Wizards, Capitals, and now Commies… err… Commanders.
 

MJ271

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 9, 2012
1,812
1,962
113
Atkins
I don’t understand what’s so bad about the name. Sure, it was a safe choice (as it probably should have been), but It fits the city, it’s tough, it’s original among major sports franchises, and fits in with other names in the league.

The jerseys on the other hand, are not great, but those’ll change with time like many other teams do. There’s lots of cool touches, such as the bars above and below “Commanders” that pay homage to the DC flag, or the dates on the crest that tie in the team’s history to the new brand, or the stars that appear on both the DC and U.S. flags. I think too many people already made their minds up that they weren’t going to like it before anything was released.

I think part of it is just that most professional teams' nicknames sound kind of ridiculous without context or history behind them. Imagine if a team came out with a name like "Red Sox" or "Packers" today. Unlike college nicknames, there's an expectation of being original, but teams also don't want to be too risky and pick a completely original name that might get even more blowback. In a couple years, no one will care about it or make fun of it unless Dan Snyder does something stupid again (which I guess is pretty likely).
 
  • Like
Reactions: PickSix

ISUTex

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 25, 2012
8,640
8,281
113
Rural U.S.A.
Red Tails
Warriors
Warhawks
Sentinels - wasn't that their name in the replacements?
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: 3TrueFans

StateThrowdown

Well-Known Member
Oct 27, 2008
343
324
63
Jasper County
Am I wrong in thinking this is still just a smokescreen? I mean, this much negativity towards a team name, the 1990s Vikings-esque "Block-W" on the helmet, generic arena football name/mascot, the horrendous attempts to hide the name before the reveal......there has to be something else coming, right???

You have a lot to learn about the stupidity of Dan Snyder.
 

cyclones500

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2010
35,924
23,450
113
Michigan
basslakebeacon.com
Commanders is generic, but it could be worse.

A focus group to name Houston’s franchise had 5 finalists:
Bobcats
Stallions
Wildcatters
Apollos
Texans

Chose the lamest/least-creative of the bunch.

It’d be like Washington Districts-of-Columbia.
 

CyHans

Well-Known Member
Apr 28, 2010
837
821
93
There’s nothing inherently bad about it; it’s just “meh”, especially when there were better options thrown around, like Red Tails or Red Hogs.

Then again, it fits the theme of “meh” names for Washington teams: Nationals, Wizards, Capitals, and now Commies… err… Commanders.
Before the Wizards it was the Bullets right? And they got rid of that because of all the murders in and around DC committed by guns/bullets?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: VeloClone

CyHans

Well-Known Member
Apr 28, 2010
837
821
93
I agree with those of you who liked it as The Washington Football Team. So, for a mascot will it be a commander in chief? A guy in a suit with aviator sunglasses? Or a general? A guy wearing a military uniform? (really not serious about either, just making a lame joke)
 

ISUTex

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 25, 2012
8,640
8,281
113
Rural U.S.A.
Should've been the Warriors. Then they could've had a muscular guy decked out like the Ultimate Warrior sprint around the stadium and violently shake the goalposts before the team runs out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Omaha Cy

coolerifyoudid

Well-Known Member
Feb 8, 2013
16,289
24,357
113
KC
lol, they were literally selling access to their topless cheerleaders and using them as personal escorts for wealthy investors, but "Commanders" is just a bridge too far?

A line had to be drawn somewhere. And wherever that line is drawn, Marion Barry is ready.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: cyclones500

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
25,066
37,208
113
Waukee
Commanders is generic, but it could be worse.

A focus group to name Houston’s franchise had 5 finalists:
Bobcats
Stallions
Wildcatters
Apollos
Texans

Chose the lamest/least-creative of the bunch.

It’d be like Washington Districts-of-Columbia.

Bobcats is pretty generic/feels like a high school team. There's a reason MJ went back to the Hornets.

Stallions is relatively generic and there are already a lot of horse-themed teams in the NFL (Broncos, Colts, and Chargers by my reckoning), but it at least feels like a pro football name. There was almost a "St. Louis Stallions" in the mid-90s that lost out to the Jaguars and the Panthers for expansion.

Wildcatters would have been a good replacement for the "Oilers."

Apollos is nice, too.

I don't hate Texans. It is a name that has seen frequent deployment throughout the history of professional football, including the AFL Dallas Texans. I just wish it were for like San Antonio or Austin instead of Houston when Houston has so many more options invoking its region rather than Texas generally.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VeloClone

TruClone

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2009
2,120
610
113
Quad Cities
Should have been Red Tails. Would of been historic and honoring a great group of men.

 
  • Winner
Reactions: Sigmapolis