Thoughts on Cowherd's take here? Is CFP going to be more popular in 5 years? What's happening at USC in 12 months? Are they breaking away like the ND AD said the big dogs would?
It depends. Let's say the top 64 schools officially break away. And as part of that, they agree to only schedule each other. You get more games between teams with larger followings that way. More people are going to tune in to see Michigan State vs Arkansas than Michigan State vs Akron. More eyeballs = more money.I didn’t see how college football will be more popular when 30+ schools will get demoted to mid major.
It depends. Let's say the top 64 schools officially break away. And as part of that, they agree to only schedule each other. You get more games between teams with larger followings that way. More people are going to tune in to see Michigan State vs Arkansas than Michigan State vs Akron. More eyeballs = more money.
So, it's not that the sport is more popular overall. You might have less people watching college football in total, but it doesn't mean that the top 64 teams will necessarily lose viewers. They may even see an increase. If you're a casual Central Michigan fan, maybe you start following Michigan State? That kind of thing.
If the Top 25 so to speak go off in their own division, the sport will become less popular. No one in the Midwest is going to care about the SEC.
And imagine what would happen to a school like Iowa if they sneak into that top league. They will be an absolute whipping boy at that level.
At this point, do it blue bloods. Not everyone gets to win 10 games every single year in a 30 team or even 40 team division.
This already happens to a certain extent. If you attend central or western Michigan you certainly cheer for your school but you also tend to also cheer for either sparty or Michigan since they essentially operate at a different level. Your number of 64 is essentially everyone in the power 5 and you could argue it would increase ratings if sparty played a non con schedule full of other P5 schools like Arkansas instead of Youngstown stateIt depends. Let's say the top 64 schools officially break away. And as part of that, they agree to only schedule each other. You get more games between teams with larger followings that way. More people are going to tune in to see Michigan State vs Arkansas than Michigan State vs Akron. More eyeballs = more money.
So, it's not that the sport is more popular overall. You might have less people watching college football in total, but it doesn't mean that the top 64 teams will necessarily lose viewers. They may even see an increase. If you're a casual Central Michigan fan, maybe you start following Michigan State? That kind of thing.
I'd love to agree but can't...if given entre to the super-league, every team will have a presumably equal share of the revenue pie, beyond that it's competent management at the AD and HC levels. Pardon the NFL example but there's really no good reason the Detroit Lions have never been to the Super Bowl. They aren't predestined to suck ballz every always. Would be the same with Iowa.If the Top 25 so to speak go off in their own division, the sport will become less popular. No one in the Midwest is going to care about the SEC.
And imagine what would happen to a school like Iowa if they sneak into that top league. They will be an absolute whipping boy at that level.
Uhhh, yeah...we're familiar with University of Northern Iowa Purple Hawkeyes fans here. (which is all of them)This already happens to a certain extent. If you attend central or western Michigan you certainly cheer for your school but you also tend to also cheer for either sparty or Michigan since they essentially operate at a different level. Your number of 64 is essentially everyone in the power 5 and you could argue it would increase ratings if sparty played a non con schedule full of other P5 schools like Arkansas instead of Youngstown state
That's exactly why I don't think the split happens. Somebody has to go 2-10 and none of those egos can stand that regardless of how big the check they're getting is.If the Top 25 so to speak go off in their own division, the sport will become less popular. No one in the Midwest is going to care about the SEC.
And imagine what would happen to a school like Iowa if they sneak into that top league. They will be an absolute whipping boy at that level.
I didn’t see how college football will be more popular when 30+ schools will get demoted to mid major.
Agree. I'd love for the blue bloods to split off and form a semi-pro league. Let the rest of us get back to playing college sports. We'll see which model lasts longer.At this point, do it blue bloods. Not everyone gets to win 10 games every single year in a 30 team or even 40 team division.
64 schools would probably keep most of the current TV audience engaged. Hoever, if you cut that number in half that audience is going to shrink pretty drastically.It depends. Let's say the top 64 schools officially break away. And as part of that, they agree to only schedule each other. You get more games between teams with larger followings that way. More people are going to tune in to see Michigan State vs Arkansas than Michigan State vs Akron. More eyeballs = more money.
So, it's not that the sport is more popular overall. You might have less people watching college football in total, but it doesn't mean that the top 64 teams will necessarily lose viewers. They may even see an increase. If you're a casual Central Michigan fan, maybe you start following Michigan State? That kind of thing.