Realignment, Alliance, and the Future of College Athletics

cyfanatic

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2006
6,544
2,484
113
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
USC/Cowherd thoughts...Gene Smith floating some ideas...are these just people thinking out loud? Or are they given info to throw out there or are they purposely floating ideas hoping for feedback? No idea...but the Gene Smith thoughts might have some push behind them to see what the public is thinking.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: StPaulCyclone

Mr Janny

Welcome to the Office of Secret Intelligence
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
Mar 27, 2006
41,155
29,428
113
I didn’t see how college football will be more popular when 30+ schools will get demoted to mid major.
It depends. Let's say the top 64 schools officially break away. And as part of that, they agree to only schedule each other. You get more games between teams with larger followings that way. More people are going to tune in to see Michigan State vs Arkansas than Michigan State vs Akron. More eyeballs = more money.

So, it's not that the sport is more popular overall. You might have less people watching college football in total, but it doesn't mean that the top 64 teams will necessarily lose viewers. They may even see an increase. If you're a casual Central Michigan fan, maybe you start following Michigan State? That kind of thing.
 

cyfanatic

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2006
6,544
2,484
113
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
It depends. Let's say the top 64 schools officially break away. And as part of that, they agree to only schedule each other. You get more games between teams with larger followings that way. More people are going to tune in to see Michigan State vs Arkansas than Michigan State vs Akron. More eyeballs = more money.

So, it's not that the sport is more popular overall. You might have less people watching college football in total, but it doesn't mean that the top 64 teams will necessarily lose viewers. They may even see an increase. If you're a casual Central Michigan fan, maybe you start following Michigan State? That kind of thing.

Or will people eventually think of it as a "developmental" league for the NFL and pay appropriate attention to such a league? Initially it is/was the appeal of rooting for a team with your school/state's name on the jersey, right? I LOVE baseball but I do not check the box scores of minor league games. I don't ever even think of looking for a "G" league score or schedule in basketball. The further removed "college" football becomes from the on campus, school pride thing...it will eventually get viewed as a "minor" league for the NFL and purely a business. That might make it more appealing for some...but others will certainly lose interest and find other ways to spend their time and money. Not right or wrong...things like that happen.
 

Al_4_State

Moderator
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 27, 2006
30,229
23,224
113
38
Driftless Region
Visit site
If the Top 25 so to speak go off in their own division, the sport will become less popular. No one in the Midwest is going to care about the SEC.

And imagine what would happen to a school like Iowa if they sneak into that top league. They will be an absolute whipping boy at that level.
 

cyfanatic

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2006
6,544
2,484
113
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
If the Top 25 so to speak go off in their own division, the sport will become less popular. No one in the Midwest is going to care about the SEC.

And imagine what would happen to a school like Iowa if they sneak into that top league. They will be an absolute whipping boy at that level.

I am guessing it would have to be almost double that to work...right? So...50 or so teams...Iowa would certainly get in that group and it might find itself in the middle of the pack on good years. But what will be the reward for finishing 25th in a league like that? It won't be the Citrus Bowl or anything like that right? Their fans would not be satisfied in that situation.
 

cyfanatic

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2006
6,544
2,484
113
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
At this point, do it blue bloods. Not everyone gets to win 10 games every single year in a 30 team or even 40 team division.

Yep...if it is going to happen...I would rather it be sudden so we don't have to go through this process "wondering" what may happen to teams X, Y and Z. Just rip the band-aid off quickly!
 
  • Like
Reactions: everyyard

FriendlySpartan

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
5,788
6,267
113
37
It depends. Let's say the top 64 schools officially break away. And as part of that, they agree to only schedule each other. You get more games between teams with larger followings that way. More people are going to tune in to see Michigan State vs Arkansas than Michigan State vs Akron. More eyeballs = more money.

So, it's not that the sport is more popular overall. You might have less people watching college football in total, but it doesn't mean that the top 64 teams will necessarily lose viewers. They may even see an increase. If you're a casual Central Michigan fan, maybe you start following Michigan State? That kind of thing.
This already happens to a certain extent. If you attend central or western Michigan you certainly cheer for your school but you also tend to also cheer for either sparty or Michigan since they essentially operate at a different level. Your number of 64 is essentially everyone in the power 5 and you could argue it would increase ratings if sparty played a non con schedule full of other P5 schools like Arkansas instead of Youngstown state
 

20eyes

Well-Known Member
May 15, 2020
2,001
2,990
113
49
If the Top 25 so to speak go off in their own division, the sport will become less popular. No one in the Midwest is going to care about the SEC.

And imagine what would happen to a school like Iowa if they sneak into that top league. They will be an absolute whipping boy at that level.
I'd love to agree but can't...if given entre to the super-league, every team will have a presumably equal share of the revenue pie, beyond that it's competent management at the AD and HC levels. Pardon the NFL example but there's really no good reason the Detroit Lions have never been to the Super Bowl. They aren't predestined to suck ballz every always. Would be the same with Iowa.
 

20eyes

Well-Known Member
May 15, 2020
2,001
2,990
113
49
This already happens to a certain extent. If you attend central or western Michigan you certainly cheer for your school but you also tend to also cheer for either sparty or Michigan since they essentially operate at a different level. Your number of 64 is essentially everyone in the power 5 and you could argue it would increase ratings if sparty played a non con schedule full of other P5 schools like Arkansas instead of Youngstown state
Uhhh, yeah...we're familiar with University of Northern Iowa Purple Hawkeyes fans here. (which is all of them)
 

1UNI2ISU

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2013
7,074
9,052
113
Waterloo
If the Top 25 so to speak go off in their own division, the sport will become less popular. No one in the Midwest is going to care about the SEC.

And imagine what would happen to a school like Iowa if they sneak into that top league. They will be an absolute whipping boy at that level.
That's exactly why I don't think the split happens. Somebody has to go 2-10 and none of those egos can stand that regardless of how big the check they're getting is.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: I@ST1 and WhoISthis

snowcraig2.0

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 2, 2007
11,360
8,252
113
46
Cedar Rapids, IA
It depends. Let's say the top 64 schools officially break away. And as part of that, they agree to only schedule each other. You get more games between teams with larger followings that way. More people are going to tune in to see Michigan State vs Arkansas than Michigan State vs Akron. More eyeballs = more money.

So, it's not that the sport is more popular overall. You might have less people watching college football in total, but it doesn't mean that the top 64 teams will necessarily lose viewers. They may even see an increase. If you're a casual Central Michigan fan, maybe you start following Michigan State? That kind of thing.
64 schools would probably keep most of the current TV audience engaged. Hoever, if you cut that number in half that audience is going to shrink pretty drastically.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron