Police Stings

alaskaguy

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
10,203
220
63
Robin Garrison, an off-duty 42-year-old firefighter, was walking in Berliner Park in Columbus, Ohio, in May when he saw a woman sunbathing topless under a tree.

He approached her and they started talking and getting comfortable, the woman smiling and resting her foot on his shoulder at one point.

Eventually, she asked to see Garrison's penis; he unzipped his pants and complied.

Seconds later, undercover police officers pulled up in a van and arrested Garrison; he was later charged with public indecency, a misdemeanor, based on video footage taken by cops who were targeting men having sex or masturbating in the park. While topless sunbathing is legal in the city's parks, exposing more than that is against the law.

Garrison was convicted, ordered to stay away from the park, placed on a year's probation and fined $250. Currently, Garrison remains on paid desk duty while the fire department conducts an internal investigation into his behavior.

In New York City, nearly 300 people, many of whom had no criminal record, have been snared this year through the NYPD's Operation Lucky Bag, in which undercover officers leave a wallet, iPod or cell phone in a subway station and wait to see who picks it up.

Link:
ABC News: Topless Woman Lured Perverts for Police
 
Last edited:

clones11

Active Member
Apr 2, 2006
537
166
43
39
Marion
that is absolute BS in my opinion a woman can show her tatas but a man cant hang free in the breeze sounds like an equal protection clause violation to me. but what do i know
 

Cyclone62

Well-Known Member
Feb 1, 2007
9,115
213
63
Oldpeopleville
that is absolute BS in my opinion a woman can show her tatas but a man cant hang free in the breeze sounds like an equal protection clause violation to me. but what do i know

Well, she can't show her cha-cha either. I've just long wondered why we hold female nipples as obscene like we do, but not male's. That's what doesn't make sense to me.
 

Ficklone02

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
4,702
377
83
City by the Bay
The part about the Operation Lucky Bag is what bothers me most. How is it considered criminal activity to pick up a lost cell phone, or wallet? Maybe these people were going to return it the authorities there so they can find the rightful owner. Stupid. Especially in NYC....they should have better things to do there.
 

Cyclone62

Well-Known Member
Feb 1, 2007
9,115
213
63
Oldpeopleville
The part about the Operation Lucky Bag is what bothers me most. How is it considered criminal activity to pick up a lost cell phone, or wallet? Maybe these people were going to return it the authorities there so they can find the rightful owner. Stupid. Especially in NYC....they should have better things to do there.

The only thing I can think of is that if they waited for them to not turn it in to the lost and found there. But even then, it's pretty weak and it bothers me as well.
 

Me State

Well-Known Member
Oct 19, 2007
2,440
122
48
The part about the Operation Lucky Bag is what bothers me most. How is it considered criminal activity to pick up a lost cell phone, or wallet? Maybe these people were going to return it the authorities there so they can find the rightful owner. Stupid. Especially in NYC....they should have better things to do there.
Usually those stings involve the suspect being present when the decoy leaves the item. The suspect then grabs the item and makes no attempt to advise the "victim". Sometimes the decoy has the item sitting next to them and they are "busy" doing something else and the person grabs the item when they aren't looking. They don't just drop a wallet in a park and then swarm anyone who picks it up. And that IS a big issue in NYC and other tourist destinations so that is why they focus on things like that.
 

diaclone

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2006
8,507
8,453
113
Metro Omaha
I think her request to see "it" constitutes entrapment. Good Lord, he's a man.......what's he supposed to do when a topless woman asks that? Say no?


Yes he is supposed to say "no." If he does that, he doesn't get arrested. He could have easily controlled himself.
 

cmoneyr

Well-Known Member
Nov 8, 2006
8,422
343
83
41
Ames, Born and Raised
Yes he is supposed to say "no." If he does that, he doesn't get arrested. He could have easily controlled himself.
Obviously he shouldn't have whipped it out, but the police officer requesting him to commit an illegal act should constitue entrapment if that's what actually happened.

That being said, I think I can live with the fact that I now know I can walk through a park in Columbus and it'll be wang free but full of funbags. I guess they needed some way to get people to live in Ohio.
 

cmoneyr

Well-Known Member
Nov 8, 2006
8,422
343
83
41
Ames, Born and Raised
Guys guys guys, this is money well spent. Wang control is an important issue that none of the current presidential candidates are willing to talk about. Get the word out people!
 

CloneIce

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
37,772
21,151
113
What a freakin joke! Do we really need our police using our tax money to entice law-abiding citizens into committing crimes so they can arrest them for it, f up their lives, and then spend a bunch more of our money prosecuting and punishing them?

Any American should be embarassed by this crap. Gestapo tactics preying on man's basic instincts and urges. Freakin ridiculous.
 

Benny34

Active Member
Nov 29, 2007
796
36
28
Wow this is rediculous. There is some sort of injustice here...:skeptical:
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron