TJ's style isn't really conducive to 8 man rotations. We don't have the money to get more than that however.
Gotta hit on freshman and under valued transfers if we're going to reach the next level. We will probably always be competitive but I'm not sure we will ever be a power house.
This is the bottom line. We can argue all day about whether 8 or 10 is the perfect rotation number, when all the while I'm sure the staff would've
loved having one more major contributor this season. reality is that's not always in the budget for schools like ISU. have to hit on cheaper players if you want reliable depth, which are generally going to be freshmen given how wild the NIL market has gotten, even for role players (though that will die down post revenue-sharing).
Having cheaper players does not mean you have to play them/prioritize rest, however, as some argue. I think everyone here would agree Lipsey and Momcilovic are home run recruits. Otz's hit percentage probably needs to increase, but it's not like the staff can’t identify talent and potential.
It's nice to see people coming around now. Back in December we had heated arguments on here about this exact thing and I was in the extreme minority of people who wanted Watson and Nojus to play more.
I think I saw Michgian St has 10 guys play between 10 and 25 minutes and it seems to work well for them. If we want to continue to exert this much energy on defense it might not be a bad idea to expand the rotation.
TJ seems kind of stubborn in his set ways though so I doubt it ever changes.
Michigan State can afford 9 or 10 P4 regular-season-champions-caliber players. Most years ISU will not be able to.
BYU was probably underseeded at a 6. If they were say seeded as a 4 and made it to the Sweet 16, they would now have to play the 1. As it is, they now get to play the 2 seed instead. Which is better? It seems that chasing a couple of seed spots is really of limited value. I'd rather do whatever I can to have a healthy team and my backup guys with some game experience in the case that I need them.
But who cares about NET or any metrics at the end of the season. Winning or losing games in March is all that matters
What if ISU was 6 seed and MissU was the 3rd seed this year. Result the same.
Goal should be having a team peaking at the end of the year. Of course you don't want to lose the early games vs lower level teams, but beating them by 30 does not matter. Just need to build rhythm and teamwork for later on
A 6 seed hasn't made the Final Four for over three decades, so, sorry, I'm gonna have to completely discount these comments. You want a 1 or a 2 seed, can live with a 3. You do whatever you have to—assuming you're not defying your medical staff or psychologically abusing players—to get one of those seeds.
The question is does do you sacrifice a 30 point win for a 20 point win and have a lower kenpom as a result in order to prepare your bench for later in the season?
Personally, getting the better seed would be nice, but our team didn’t peak when it needed to at the end of the season like how some others have.
None of the title contenders think this way. Four teams had historically great kenpom NetRtgs going into the tournament. Auburn beat the crap out of bad teams, the difference (between them and ISU) is they beat almost everyone they played for over two months, the lone loss being to another title contender. Florida was similarly dominant. Duke obviously benefitted from a weak ACC, but beat the crap out of bad teams and average teams alike. We all know what Houston did in conference play. Now, were those rosters deeper? Most of them, probably. Could ISU get better at moneyball to achieve comparable depth? Sure. But perennial contenders that are well-funded don't even entertain "tanking" a seed line or two in a vain attempt to avoid injuries or fatigue. Every team will be banged up and tired by the end of the season. ISU just had too many *serious* injuries to overcome. You try to build a Final Four roster, and play your best players in hopes that even they can improve over the course of the season. Most of the time it's that simple