Physics Help

TitanClone

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 21, 2008
3,600
2,960
113
A ball thrown from 2 meters above the ground with a velocity of 6.8m/s at an angle of 60 degrees above the horizontal lands in a basket 2.3 meters away.

a) What is the height of the basket?
b)With what velocity (magnitude and angle) does the ball land in the basket? Neglect air resistance.

I just need help getting started, not looking for an answer. I think I'm just over thinking it because the 60 degrees is thrown in there.

Thanks in advance!
 

iahawkhunter

Well-Known Member
Apr 17, 2010
3,065
423
83
Huxley, IA
A ball thrown from 2 meters above the ground with a velocity of 6.8m/s at an angle of 60 degrees above the horizontal lands in a basket 2.3 meters away.

a) What is the height of the basket?
b)With what velocity (magnitude and angle) does the ball land in the basket? Neglect air resistance.

I just need help getting started, not looking for an answer. I think I'm just over thinking it because the 60 degrees is thrown in there.

Thanks in advance!

Separate your initial velocity into horizontal and vertical components (cosine and sine, respectively), and then you have constant-velocity in the horizontal direction and constant acceleration (gravity, acting downward) in the vertical direction.

EDIT: from this you can find your ending velocities and use the tangent function to find the angle.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TitanClone

TitanClone

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 21, 2008
3,600
2,960
113
Separate your initial velocity into horizontal and vertical components (cosine and sine, respectively), and then you have constant-velocity in the horizontal direction and constant acceleration (gravity, acting downward) in the vertical direction.

EDIT: from this you can find your ending velocities and use the tangent function to find the angle.
Thanks!

Took me 2 minutes after staring at it for like 20.
 

Wesley

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
70,923
546
113
Omaha
Will the airplane take off? Or will it not? Are the bearings in the wheel frictionless? Is it an ideal plane?

That thread was priceless...I only wish I was around when it was written!
Time to bring it back to rethink the solution.
 

VTXCyRyD

Well-Known Member
Sep 2, 2010
5,652
3,017
113
Will the airplane take off? Or will it not? Are the bearings in the wheel frictionless? Is it an ideal plane?

That thread was priceless...I only wish I was around when it was written!
Did anyone ask if the airplane was a Harrier or an Osprey?
 

JUKEBOX

Well-Known Member
Oct 27, 2008
7,961
1,479
113
I'm sure this problem is easy; I just can't find the correct formula to use. Anyone know it?

In November 2007, astronaut Pam Melroy, history’s second woman space
shuttle commander, flew the space shuttle Discovery to the International
Space Station to continue construction. To undock from the space station,
Commander Melroy released hooks holding the two spacecraft together and
the 76,700 kg shuttle pushed away from the space station with the aid of 4 large
springs. a) If the 232,700 kg space station moved back at a speed of 0.50 m/s,
how fast and in what direction did the space shuttle move
 

iahawkhunter

Well-Known Member
Apr 17, 2010
3,065
423
83
Huxley, IA
I'm sure this problem is easy; I just can't find the correct formula to use. Anyone know it?

In November 2007, astronaut Pam Melroy, history’s second woman space
shuttle commander, flew the space shuttle Discovery to the International
Space Station to continue construction. To undock from the space station,
Commander Melroy released hooks holding the two spacecraft together and
the 76,700 kg shuttle pushed away from the space station with the aid of 4 large
springs. a) If the 232,700 kg space station moved back at a speed of 0.50 m/s,
how fast and in what direction did the space shuttle move

Momentum must be conserved, so the space station's momentum in one direction must be countered by the shuttle's momentum in the other (akin to equal and opposite forces). Since momentum is mass times velocity:

(232700)*(0.5) + (76700)*(v) = 0

The two terms sum to 0 because there is no initial relative velocity between the shuttle and the station. This will also give the shuttle velocity, v, as a negative number which will reflect the fact that the shuttle is moving in the opposite direction of the station.
 

JUKEBOX

Well-Known Member
Oct 27, 2008
7,961
1,479
113
Momentum must be conserved, so the space station's momentum in one direction must be countered by the shuttle's momentum in the other (akin to equal and opposite forces). Since momentum is mass times velocity:

(232700)*(0.5) + (76700)*(v) = 0

The two terms sum to 0 because there is no initial relative velocity between the shuttle and the station. This will also give the shuttle velocity, v, as a negative number which will reflect the fact that the shuttle is moving in the opposite direction of the station.

This is what I thought, but they have a different answer on this website.
http://www.chsdarkmatter.com/hps10.pdf


I get 1.517 m/s, but they have 2.52 m/s.
 

Frak

Well-Known Member
Apr 27, 2009
11,449
7,055
113
I freaking hated 221. Thank God for graphing calculators with memory to store formulas (yeah, I cheated on some tests).
 

iahawkhunter

Well-Known Member
Apr 17, 2010
3,065
423
83
Huxley, IA
This is what I thought, but they have a different answer on this website.
http://www.chsdarkmatter.com/hps10.pdf


I get 1.517 m/s, but they have 2.52 m/s.

Crap. After some internet searching here's what I've found:

Astronaur Pam Melroy flew the space shuttle Discovery to the International Space Station to complete? - Yahoo! Answers (same approach as I said above, but with different numbers)

Note that the linked problem asks for the relative velocity between the shuttle and station. If we do that here, you get 2.02 m/s (0.5 + 1.52), which makes up half the difference between your answer and the provided answer. I'm not sure where the remaining 0.5 m/s is coming from, and since the question just asks for the shuttle velocity I feel like the relative velocity between them is irrelevant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JUKEBOX

hawkeyeh8r

Well-Known Member
Jun 10, 2010
2,159
46
48
36
Ames
i think the answer comes out to going 75/75 on free throws...or maybe im getting it confused with something else
 

JUKEBOX

Well-Known Member
Oct 27, 2008
7,961
1,479
113
Crap. After some internet searching here's what I've found:

Astronaur Pam Melroy flew the space shuttle Discovery to the International Space Station to complete? - Yahoo! Answers (same approach as I said above, but with different numbers)

Note that the linked problem asks for the relative velocity between the shuttle and station. If we do that here, you get 2.02 m/s (0.5 + 1.52), which makes up half the difference between your answer and the provided answer. I'm not sure where the remaining 0.5 m/s is coming from, and since the question just asks for the shuttle velocity I feel like the relative velocity between them is irrelevant.

I think I might just go with 1.52 and bite the bullet if it's wrong.