****Official Class Of 2025 Recruiting Thread****

CyberJJJ

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 19, 2006
4,054
3,343
113
Johnston, IA
You mean Rob, Ward, and King.

Why did you list Jackson, Jefferson, and Chatfield? He has the same amount of time against those three regardless.

He’s not playing at all. He’s likely not going to play much next year. Having another year of eligibility is worth more to a big like him than better practices as a 17 year old

It’s rare that starting the clock early on a 7 footer that’s a long way off physically from being a Big 12 starter is optimal. Better to go prep school (or now juco) and delay the clock
Respectfully disagree with a couple of your points.

1) You said "He's not playing at all. He's likely not going to play much next year." If that were true, you could say the same thing about Nojus, which I don't believe is true. Jefferson and Jackson can come back next year, but there is no guarantee. Thus we might be replacing more than Chatfield on the front line.

2) You mentioned starting the clock early on a 7 footer. Going to juco and delaying the clock wasn't known as an option when the choice was made to bring him in. He had other D1 offers if we hadn't taken him, although I don't know that was strictly tied to starting early. For a big like him, I don't believe we expected him to play right away. If he doesn't play much next year, he will still have two years here if he sticks it out. I realized a two-year transfer likely had playing time elsewhere, but he is practicing everyday against high-end talent in Jackson, Jefferson and Chatfield which is why I mentioned them. Starting his clock early got him into school on scholarship.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hoosman and Acer88

CyberJJJ

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 19, 2006
4,054
3,343
113
Johnston, IA
He's in the middle of his teams season and not expected to announce until it is over in a couple of months.
I hadn't read that anywhere. Is that info you have or speculation? I realize it isn't speculation it is the middle of his season.
Lipsey/Heise + the young studs is one hell of a start
Are we forgetting Nojus? He has played some three this year, but it feels like his natural position is likely more at the two.
 

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
98,812
62,363
113
55
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
I hadn't read that anywhere. Is that info you have or speculation? I realize it isn't speculation it is the middle of his season.

Are we forgetting Nojus? He has played some three this year, but it feels like his natural position is likely more at the two.
No, he's one of the young studs
 

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
98,812
62,363
113
55
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
Nojus, from the little I've seen is a very smart player. He shields his dribble well, finds space well, and has a very smooth shot. And, if I recall, he touted his defense when we were recruiting him. I think we may see more of him in the future.
He has also looked completely comfortable since the first day he hit the floor for us.
 

Drew0311

Well-Known Member
Nov 7, 2019
9,067
13,747
113
51
Norwalk, Iowa
Nojus, from the little I've seen is a very smart player. He shields his dribble well, finds space well, and has a very smooth shot. And, if I recall, he touted his defense when we were recruiting him. I think we may see more of him in the future.


He kind of has a Caleb Grill his first year thing going. Just needs to get up to the speed of the game and he will be fine. Wish we could have redshirted him this year
 

exCYtable

Well-Known Member
Apr 15, 2010
4,759
8,435
113
In particular if we are fortunate enough to get Curtis back. It’s another national title window if that occurs. Borrow from the future, if needed

If we can get the German big, I’d bet on still adding at least a transfer guard and frontcourt player. The latter of which is probably a low cost/usage Jones and Chatfield type

The current freshman and incoming freshmen have a lot of potential to be surprise rotation guys too

Tamin, CuJo, Heise,

Milan, Watson, Jefferson, Jackson, Tra
nsfer in the frontcourt

That’s already a top-15 rotation before considering any of the underclassmen are good enough to contribute, or we land another unheralded transfer guard (like Curtis was)
That's a top FIVE rotation already if that's next year
 

FinalFourCy

Well-Known Member
Mar 5, 2017
10,435
10,160
113
41
Respectfully disagree with a couple of your points.

1) You said "He's not playing at all. He's likely not going to play much next year." If that were true, you could say the same thing about Nojus, which I don't believe is true. Jefferson and Jackson can come back next year, but there is no guarantee. Thus we might be replacing more than Chatfield on the front line.

2) You mentioned starting the clock early on a 7 footer. Going to juco and delaying the clock wasn't known as an option when the choice was made to bring him in. He had other D1 offers if we hadn't taken him, although I don't know that was strictly tied to starting early. For a big like him, I don't believe we expected him to play right away. If he doesn't play much next year, he will still have two years here if he sticks it out. I realized a two-year transfer likely had playing time elsewhere, but he is practicing everyday against high-end talent in Jackson, Jefferson and Chatfield which is why I mentioned them. Starting his clock early got him into school on scholarship.

notice there is no “therefore” or “thus” between those statements. My statement that Rock is unlikely to play much next year is not simply because he’s not playing this year. It’s because he’s unlikely to be ready, and we’ll likely be able to add some that will force him out of the rotation.

Nojus on the other hand is more likely to be ready, although if we have 3 or 4 upperclassmen guards, I’d say there is a material chance he too will struggle to be top 8 in the rotation, even if a quality Big 12 guard

You’ve yet to explain why you disagree that the odds are that Rock would see more minutes in his career if a true freshman now, rather than a redshirt freshman. It gives him more time to develop, which is needed. Or why you disagree with the notion that bigs take longer to develop, hence why starting the clock early reducing college career impact, even though he’s better as a 18 year old by starting the clock early. We gave up having a 23 year old Rock for having a 17 year old Rock

Instead you listed a benefit of enrolling early being that he could go against Jefferson, Jackson, and Chatfield, which suggests you’re not thinking about this
 
Last edited:

Cloneon

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2015
3,000
3,132
113
West Virginia
notice there is no “therefore” or “thus” between those statements. My statement that Rock is unlikely to play much next year is not simply because he’s not playing this year. It’s because he’s unlikely to be ready, and we’ll likely be able to add some that will force him out of the rotation.

Nojus on the other hand is more likely to be ready, although if we have 3 or 4 upperclassmen guards, I’d say there is a material chance he too will struggle to be top 8 in the rotation, even if a quality Big 12 guard

You’ve yet to explain why you disagree that the odds are that Rock would see more minutes in his career if a true freshman now, rather than a redshirt freshman. It gives him more time to develop, which is needed. Or why you disagree with the notion that bigs take longer to develop, hence why starting the clock early reducing college career impact, even though he’s better as a 18 year old by starting the clock early. We gave up having a 23 year old Rock for having a 17 year old Rock

Instead you listed a benefit of enrolling early being that he could go against Jefferson, Jackson, and Chatfield, which suggests you’re not thinking about this
Watching the West Virginia defense extend our guards, I just wonder what it would've looked like if we put three bigs in.
 

NENick

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2017
2,548
4,260
113
You’ve yet to explain why you disagree that the odds are that Rock would see more minutes in his career if a true freshman now, rather than a redshirt freshman. It gives him more time to develop, which is needed. Or why you disagree with the notion that bigs take longer to develop, hence why starting the clock early reducing college career impact, even though he’s better as a 18 year old by starting the clock early. We gave up having a 23 year old Rock for having a 17 year old Rock

Instead you listed a benefit of enrolling early being that he could go against Jefferson, Jackson, and Chatfield, which suggests you’re not thinking about ththis
Hindsight is 20-20.
The rationale was that Rock wasn't going to develop as well playing against South Dakota high school competition. Getting him to campus, getting acclimated to college while playing against grown men, while also working with ISU strength and conditioning staff, was the decision made. I'm certainly not giving up on him.
 

Cloneon

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2015
3,000
3,132
113
West Virginia
Hindsight is 20-20.
The rationale was that Rock wasn't going to develop as well playing against South Dakota high school competition. Getting him to campus, getting acclimated to college while playing against grown men, while also working with ISU strength and conditioning staff, was the decision made. I'm certainly not giving up on him.
I can honestly say he's bulked up, is rigid in the system (meaning he knows what to do, but he's still thinking step to step instead of it being natural), and needs to improve his foot speed. I think it's 50/50 on whether he can elevate to the next level required to get minutes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Letterkenny

FinalFourCy

Well-Known Member
Mar 5, 2017
10,435
10,160
113
41
Hindsight is 20-20.
The rationale was that Rock wasn't going to develop as well playing against South Dakota high school competition. Getting him to campus, getting acclimated to college while playing against grown men, while also working with ISU strength and conditioning staff, was the decision made. I'm certainly not giving up on him.
It’s not just hindsight. It’s well established that bigs take longer to develop.

Of course that was the reasoning. That wasn’t in question.

We picked Rock being further along at his age over being further along for his class year
 

cyclones12321

Well-Known Member
Feb 21, 2009
8,258
1,772
113
38
Newton Ia
I hadn't read that anywhere. Is that info you have or speculation? I realize it isn't speculation it is the middle of his season.

Are we forgetting Nojus? He has played some three this year, but it feels like his natural position is likely more at the two.
I love what Watson has been doing and kudos to him, he deserves it. I’m really surprised Nojus hasn’t got more time. He seems like a huge offensive threat. His defense must need some development to get time?
 

CyberJJJ

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 19, 2006
4,054
3,343
113
Johnston, IA
notice there is no “therefore” or “thus” between those statements. My statement that Rock is unlikely to play much next year is not simply because he’s not playing this year. It’s because he’s unlikely to be ready, and we’ll likely be able to add some that will force him out of the rotation.

Nojus on the other hand is more likely to be ready, although if we have 3 or 4 upperclassmen guards, I’d say there is a material chance he too will struggle to be top 8 in the rotation, even if a quality Big 12 guard

You’ve yet to explain why you disagree that the odds are that Rock would see more minutes in his career if a true freshman now, rather than a redshirt freshman. It gives him more time to develop, which is needed. Or why you disagree with the notion that bigs take longer to develop, hence why starting the clock early reducing college career impact, even though he’s better as a 18 year old by starting the clock early. We gave up having a 23 year old Rock for having a 17 year old Rock

Instead you listed a benefit of enrolling early being that he could go against Jefferson, Jackson, and Chatfield, which suggests you’re not thinking about this
Only that if staying in high school he would have played against “midgets” as Julo described his summer league experience. Besides the competition in practice everyday, he has benefited from high level nutrition and training. 247 had him listed at 225 lbs in HS, but now he is listed at 260 on the roster. That work last year better prepped him for the work against even better bigs on the roster this year.

I have no idea if he will play much next year, depending on who’s on the team. I do, however, feel he is likely further along as a basketball player today then he would’ve been if we had not brought him in early. If not having done that,might he can have considered going elsewhere that would have? Was this part of the draw to commit to Iowa State when he had other good offers? I have no inside information so I don’t know.

I do get the point that his four years would’ve included a year older if he hadn’t of started early. I just felt the benefits outlined above outweighed the basic age benefit. I trust TJ‘s roster management. I could be completely wrong, just shared my opinion as it was different from what you posted. It’s just a discussion, not an argument.
 

Psiclone

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
3,421
1,588
113
Only that if staying in high school he would have played against “midgets” as Julo described his summer league experience. Besides the competition in practice everyday, he has benefited from high level nutrition and training. 247 had him listed at 225 lbs in HS, but now he is listed at 260 on the roster. That work last year better prepped him for the work against even better bigs on the roster this year.

I have no idea if he will play much next year, depending on who’s on the team. I do, however, feel he is likely further along as a basketball player today then he would’ve been if we had not brought him in early. If not having done that,might he can have considered going elsewhere that would have? Was this part of the draw to commit to Iowa State when he had other good offers? I have no inside information so I don’t know.

I do get the point that his four years would’ve included a year older if he hadn’t of started early. I just felt the benefits outlined above outweighed the basic age benefit. I trust TJ‘s roster management. I could be completely wrong, just shared my opinion as it was different from what you posted. It’s just a discussion, not an argument.
Exactly, not as if anyone knows exactly what the future holds. I’m betting at the beginning of the 23-24 season, not a single person would have predicted Jones would be a conference POTY candidate in the Big XII. To paraphrase the quote about opinions, ….everyone has one.
 

FinalFourCy

Well-Known Member
Mar 5, 2017
10,435
10,160
113
41
Exactly, not as if anyone knows exactly what the future holds. I’m betting at the beginning of the 23-24 season, not a single person would have predicted Jones would be a conference POTY candidate in the Big XII. To paraphrase the quote about opinions, ….everyone has one.

We’re talking about a 7’0” that needed development. It’s very predictable that he’d be much better as a 23 year old than a 17 year old
 
  • Like
Reactions: Psiclone