Completely disagree.
Not saying that top teams shouldn't beat them but there is a huge budget and talent difference between a mid-level A10, Valley, MW team (approx 150) and a SWAC or MEAC team (300+). If there wasn't a difference, buy games wouldn't cost drastically different amounts and Power League schools wouldn't be bailing out of MTEs where there are teams from the true mid-major conferences.
Looking at the NET and you were a bubble team that absolutely had to have a win would you rather play Illinois State (147, $4M budget) or Colorado State (149, $6M budget) or would you rather play Florida A&M (301, $1.1M budget) or Western Illinois (307, $990k budget)?
Quads are set appropriately and to the level of competition they provide.
Again, for a team in the field that range doesn't make much of a difference. You also have no control on where those teams will fall in Q3 or Q4 when they are scheduled. It's silly to weight those differently because at the end of the day they are all buy games regardless of the price tag.