NCAA considering 5 years of eligibility for all sports

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
98,620
62,040
113
54
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
 
  • Informative
Reactions: NENick

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,134
73,383
113
Ankeny

Figured it'd head this way with the nil issues with preserving redshirts. Just give everyone 5 years eligibility and get rid of redshirts entirely
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
73,596
63,274
113
LA LA Land
I actually hope they do this and have all time individual records before and after covid.

Covid year killed all career records. Cam Ward isn't actually the greatest QB of all time, Jordan Bohannon isn't actually the greatest 3 point shooter of all time.

If not, covid year records need an asterisk if they were achieved in a player's fifth year.

I realize at some point it was 3 year careers because freshman didn't play. It's the same thing.
 

cyfan92

Well-Known Member
Sep 20, 2011
8,152
12,979
113
Augusta National Golf Club
giphy.gif
 

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,134
73,383
113
Ankeny
Tell me how we don't end up with unlimited eligibility?

At very least I think we see the '5 year clock' going away as well.

It may still be easy enough to limit the number of years someone can actually participate, but if someone starts college, leaves, and comes back, they'll probably be able to make a good argument they should be able to use their remaining years.

Replace the clock and redshirts with the simple "you can play 5 years" and it simplifies things quite a bit, just leaves the medical hardship waiver out there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DukeofStratford

Die4Cy

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2010
14,931
15,780
113
This, like NIL was understood to be at the time of the ruling, is just another terrible idea whose time has come. But it will simplify things if done without a bunch of exceptions. Hopefully they get away from eligibility rulings altogether with this and you are out five years after you first show up on a campus. That wouldn't be bad.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
73,596
63,274
113
LA LA Land
This, like NIL was understood to be at the time of the ruling, is just another terrible idea whose time has come. But it will simplify things if done without a bunch of exceptions. Hopefully they get away from eligibility rulings altogether with this and you are out five years after you first show up on a campus. That wouldn't be bad.

5 years for everybody...plus I would hope something like Lucca Staiger getting a year taken away because he played for Iowa State instead of SEC football.

That to me was the worst example ever in terms of professional status. Two guys he didn't know were paid $500 on a European team and he's inelibible...but it was ok for Cam Newton to get a quarter million dollars at the same time because they gave it to his dad and Cam "didn't know about it".

It probably helps ISU to not have any rulings on professional status or eligibility, the same way that getting rid of all video replay might actually help the Big 12, Iowa State, Arizona State, etc when it's clear replay can only hurt us, just a second chance to get screwed in addition to the chance to get screwed live.
 

JK4ISU

Well-Known Member
Dec 5, 2022
333
566
93
65
Ames
One potential problem is that some kids might go to junior college that doesn’t count against eligibility for a year or two and then use their five years. Also, there may spring up development programs like those fake high schools of the past, where someone plays for a year or two and then goes to college. The best basketball schools will then have a mixture young superstars and 24 or 25 year old players. I think the time limit should be post high school or be an age limit. Some might argue that ISU will have better teams and/or the kids will make more money. I’m not against better teams and more money, but it will seem even more like minor league pro basketball and less like college basketball.
 

Letterkenny

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 26, 2023
1,606
3,336
113
Tell me how we don't end up with unlimited eligibility?
With the recent court ruling that JUCO doesn't count, I don't know how they don't inevitably rule for unlimited eligibility. The NCAA has it's rules, but wasn't that basically a court saying "your rules aren't legal". So I don't see what's stopping other players from suing to be able to play as long as they want.

Then again, I don't know how no one has sued the NFL over their age and college experience restrictions of when players can go to the NFL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cychl82