Missing easy shots

PolkCityClone

Well-Known Member
Mar 24, 2006
2,338
85
48
I watched the ISU - EIU replay last night. Granted. I am not a WBB expert, but have seen several games over the years. The thing that is hard for me to understand is the number of easy shots they miss. I am talking layups and 1-2 foot put backs. They should have blown out Iowa by 30+, but missed way too many easy shots. Lacey is the only player that consistently made her layups.
 

cstrunk

Well-Known Member
Mar 21, 2006
14,453
4,866
113
38
Longview, TX
You're absolutely right. However, this is not the norm in the women's games. Both teams were shooting pretty horrid during the game. Our women do not normally shoot that poorly.
 

cmoore_23

Well-Known Member
Mar 23, 2006
4,446
58
48
36
Ankeny, IA
ya it was just kinda an off night.. we didnt shoot to well from behind the arc either.. but lately its been our D that has stepped up and during this game ball control.. to hold iowa to 28% shooting and to force 17 turnovers and to commit 5 is pretty awesome
 

CYdTracked

Well-Known Member
Mar 23, 2006
18,593
9,421
113
Grimes, IA
I wish our men could shoot the trey like our women do. Would sure take a lot of defensive attention off our big guys.
 

Wesley

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
70,923
546
113
Omaha
My kingdom for a real three point shooter. I would personally donate 25,000 credits to get that shooter on this team. The inside game has a very hard time because the outside game is ZERO threat....our outside shooting percentage is dependent on the outside air temprerture for the game.
 

cloneu

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2007
4,674
293
83
Urbandale
www.golfdsm.com
the shots just were not falling we hit 2 in a row and other then that i dont remember any other ones going in.. had some good looks.. just couldnt get the bounce

I was very surprised by this. I don't watch a lot of women's games and have only been to 1 or 2, but from the times I have watched and listened to them, 3's were the strong point.

It is nice though that they have people like Ross and Wieben, who can get the points in the paint when those 3's don't fall.
 

CyCloned

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2006
13,602
6,968
113
Robins, Iowa
I was very surprised by this. I don't watch a lot of women's games and have only been to 1 or 2, but from the times I have watched and listened to them, 3's were the strong point.

It is nice though that they have people like Ross and Wieben, who can get the points in the paint when those 3's don't fall.

I thought the game was officiated so the teams could play physically. I thought both teams got away with some shoves and grabs on shooters under the basket. I also thought that Iowa was focussing thier defense on stopping the 3 point shots. After the way the woman have shot a couple nights this year, I don't blame them.
 

BenEClone

Well-Known Member
Mar 21, 2006
2,691
361
83
Lincoln, Ne
I"m a big fan of the three, but, I'm a bigger fan of winning. Had we relied on the three and the zone defense, we would have lost. This year we have the athleticism to play man D and also have a good zone. We have the capacity to score inside and outside and more depth in the paint than expected with the early development of Anderson. Those who have watched the Sisters over the years know that zone D is the norm. I am really excited about the potential of this evolution. The three point shot is unreliable - evidence - the Iowa game. Good defense and hard work in the paint will win games more consistently.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron