Kent St is not that bad

cloneluke80

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
1,772
52
48
West Des Moines, IA
Game Summary from Phil Steele:

Kent st completely outplayed Kentucky in the 1st half with a 268-98 yard edge but fumbled twice and was interecepted to stop 3 drives and also got to the Kentucky 11 at the end of the half but out of timeouts they could not get off a FG attempt so 4 scoring opportunites were wasted...

I still think they will compete for the MAC title.
 

Incyte

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2007
4,956
931
83
I heard the same about Toledo/UNLV/UNI last year. I don't buy it any more.

We simply are a bad team.
 

brianhos

Moderator
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 1, 2006
56,688
29,979
113
Trenchtown
I am not so sure we are a bad team. we might be a decent team that has not gelled yet. Gotta give it a little time.

Holy s**t, was I just the optimistic one out of the bunch? Something is wrong here, I must be stroking out. Anyone got an aspirin?
 

jbhtexas

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2006
14,317
4,361
113
Arlington, TX
I heard the same about Toledo/UNLV/UNI last year. I don't buy it any more.

Quite true.

Kent St rolled up over 450 yards of offense against Kentucky. ISU's defense didn't do quite that bad. Maybe there is some consolation in that...
 
Last edited:

AirWalke

Well-Known Member
Aug 7, 2006
7,020
1,592
113
Des Moines
I am not so sure we are a bad team. we might be a decent team that has not gelled yet. Gotta give it a little time.

Holy s**t, was I just the optimistic one out of the bunch? Something is wrong here, I must be stroking out. Anyone got an aspirin?

Whoa? Hell must be freezing over!

I think you just ensured ISU's success this Saturday! :biglaugh:
 

AirWalke

Well-Known Member
Aug 7, 2006
7,020
1,592
113
Des Moines
They have arguably one of the best offenses in the SEC, along with a QB that could very easily claim a 1st or 2nd team All-American spot.
 

Wesley

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
70,923
546
113
Omaha
I am not so sure we are a bad team. we might be a decent team that has not gelled yet. Gotta give it a little time.

Holy s**t, was I just the optimistic one out of the bunch? Something is wrong here, I must be stroking out. Anyone got an aspirin?

I will give us until 2012 to jell. R U jellin'?
 

ISUFan22

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
33,923
904
113
Denver, CO
Some people are giving them a shot against Louisville this week.

Mostly because they're 2-0. I have heard they are better, yet I'd doubt they're that good.

Often times people put far too much weight on one week of football. Just like Week 1 in the NFL.

Just because Indy pounded the Saints doesn't mean they won't be in the Super Bowl come February - but if you read some articles - they'll be lucky to make the playoffs this year based on that game.
 

cydsho

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 10, 2006
4,333
5,716
113
Omaha, NE
Before the season if you would have told me that ISU would have developed a decent running game and protected the QB enough to only allow 2 sacks in the first two games, I would think we would have two wins. So far that is major improvement from last year. So I don't think we are simply a bad team with no hope this year. You can tell these guys have not gelled into a "team". My expectations for this year was not an X amount of wins but improvement in what we couldn't do last year and improvement during the year. With that said, can we please win some freakin ball games?
 

ISUonthemove

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2007
3,810
106
48
42
Altoona
Our OL is weak and young. We all know that. And our DL absolutely cannot get to the QB. Which equates to 0-1 win this season. Not even sure where the 1 comes from.
 

CLONE2THEBONE

Active Member
Aug 4, 2006
886
36
28
I'm 100% positive we'll win at least 2 games. I also don't know where either will come from, but I have a sneaky suspicion we're not as bad as we think and Iowa is not as good.

I would not be shocked if we won this weekend, although I'm probably going to jinx it by taking the Clones and the po
 

ISUFan22

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
33,923
904
113
Denver, CO
Before the season if you would have told me that ISU would have developed a decent running game and protected the QB enough to only allow 2 sacks in the first two games, I would think we would have two wins. So far that is major improvement from last year. So I don't think we are simply a bad team with no hope this year. You can tell these guys have not gelled into a "team". My expectations for this year was not an X amount of wins but improvement in what we couldn't do last year and improvement during the year. With that said, can we please win some freakin ball games?

This is very, very accurate. While they wouldn't have been firm wins, we likely would be 2-0 if we could just hold onto the football (dropped punts, interceptions, bad snaps) and decrease the number of silly, untimely penalties.

So yes, if those things were corrected, which are very correctable, we could be an ok football team this year.

Having said that, we still fall like a house of cards following any sort of mistake. Those things kill you just as much, if not more, than the mistake itself.

Part of that is general adversity handling - mental toughness and the will-power/confidence to leap over those road blocks.

The other part is, while I think we're better defensively, our defense is still not to the point where we can expect them to make plays for us, especially following turnovers or a rash of 3-and-outs.

In 2004 and especially in 2005 - our defense did that for us. We were not world beaters, but had some success those years.

We're saw what happened in 2006 with a sub-par defense and we're seeing what happens with it so far this year.

Defense can win you football games, even when the offense isn't helping the team. We're not there yet on defense.
 

ajk4st8

Well-Known Member
Mar 27, 2006
16,483
737
113
42
Ankeny
Kentucky has a 'good' QB but isn't anything spectacular. With that said, to have that many more yards than an SEC team at that point in the game is pretty good.