John Deere as corporate punching bag

ISU22CY

Well-Known Member
Dec 15, 2012
5,093
6,670
113
Iowa
Hopefully everyone that has to go through this comes out and knows there is another day, week, month, etc. Deere isn’t their life there is far more to them.

There will be a ton of other companies that are going to get some great employees out of this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cy$

JM4CY

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 23, 2012
37,802
74,407
113
America
I live near the thick of it. It’s bad. Like really bad and I’m surprised there’s not more coverage of it. Everywhere I go in CF/Wloo you find people either talking about it or directly affected by it.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: JimDogRock

CysRage

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2009
13,378
8,682
113
This has been Deere’s approach for years. Demand drops, dump headcount. Demand recovers, massive “oh ****” levels of hiring and contracting.

And they probably look at it and say based on profitability that it is working, but they need to be honest with themselves. This turnover can’t be good. Given all that market share secured over decades they still have a fair amount of room for error.
My company hired 3 JD employees who lost their jobs during a prior major layoff (2016ish). I kid you not, ALL 3 went back within 18 months. I never got the mindset that you'd go back to a company who let you go even if it was purely business reasons for the layoff.
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,474
24,401
113
What gets me is the loss of good people you should retain for the future.

If you do a RIF and basically use it to get rid of deadwood employees (and every company has them) - well thats fine and good.
If your business has changed and needs to just be rightsized, i.e. its just going to be smaller going forwards, well then thats fine- unfortunate but necessary.

But if you are doing this cycle of boom and bust, layoff and rehire, repeatedly... thats long term bad for your business. Best people wont work for you, knowing they are at high risk. Good people let go wont come back often because they found something else. Its shortsighted, too much short termism.

Maybe it works for factory employees, because they arent as mobile and dont have as many options. Maybe they have an expectation of on again off again.

But if youre laying off your knowledge ppl, they can go anywhere esp with wfh options. Why not just invest $500m like its r&d and keep a bunch of folks around?

This is the way of business now. Shareholders aren’t looking at how this affects the business long term. They want profits in this cycle. So the “waste” of retaining employees for projects that aren’t being funded reduces profit and is deemed unacceptable
 

ISU22CY

Well-Known Member
Dec 15, 2012
5,093
6,670
113
Iowa
My company hired 3 JD employees who lost their jobs during a prior major layoff (2016ish). I kid you not, ALL 3 went back within 18 months. I never got the mindset that you'd go back to a company who let you go even if it was purely business reasons for the layoff.
Sounds like some buddies and their crazy ex girlfriends that turned into their even crazier ex wives
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,474
24,401
113
I live near the thick of it. It’s bad. Like really bad and I’m surprised there’s not more coverage of it. Everywhere I go in CF/Wloo you find people either talking about it or directly affected by it.

There’s certainly an expectation it will be bad. No one really knows for sure though.
 

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,153
55,049
113
My company hired 3 JD employees who lost their jobs during a prior major layoff (2016ish). I kid you not, ALL 3 went back within 18 months. I never got the mindset that you'd go back to a company who let you go even if it was purely business reasons for the layoff.

Only if the pay was so much better that it makes the difference I guess but that's still really volatile.
 

JM4CY

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 23, 2012
37,802
74,407
113
America
The Ag engineering that has already happened is nothing compared to what is expected from the groups being affected today.
I get it. I’m saying of all the different people I know already impacted they are from 4 very different arms of JD. This negative momentum has already been rolling.
 

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,474
63,480
113
Not exactly sure.
I get it. I’m saying of all the different people I know already impacted they are from 4 very different arms of JD. This negative momentum has already been rolling.
Deere is a weird company when you look at them. They have been having decent profits but when you look at their balance sheets, their debt is climbing at a pretty steady pace for the profit they are turning.
 

Jer

CF Founder, Creator
Feb 28, 2006
23,580
23,426
10,030
Billions of dollars in profit and laying people off. #Merica
This is what should continue to make people absolutely enraged. Companies constantly switching back and forth between on-shore and off-shore to find every single dollar they can save. No loyalty to those that have been there and gained vast knowledge. Often get rid of the system or process experts so they never have the right hands on deck when things go wrong. All while the Executive Teams make millions of dollars a year - mostly just sitting in useless meetings all day.

This isn't about politics - this is about pure and utter greed without any sense of worth for those doing the actual work. And let's not forget that teachers make as little as 35K a year while high school coaches can make over a million in Texas. Example 276,987 on why the world is so ****** up and upside down.
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,474
24,401
113
This is what should continue to make people absolutely enraged. Companies constantly switching back and forth between on-shore and off-shore to find every single dollar they can save. No loyalty to those that have been there and gained vast knowledge. Often get rid of the system or process experts so they never have the right hands on deck when things go wrong. All while the Executive Teams make millions of dollars a year - mostly just sitting in useless meetings all day.

This isn't about politics - this is about pure and utter greed without any sense of worth for those doing the actual work. Example 276,987 on why the world is so ****** up and upside down.

Again. This is what we signed up for with companies turning to public shares vs private ownership. Everything is about short term. John Deere isn’t unique. Shareholders put a CEO in place to maximize profit and pay them well to make sure they own them. If that ends up crushing the business, no worry. They’ll have divested by the time it crumbles and they move on to the next business.
 

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,474
63,480
113
Not exactly sure.
This is what should continue to make people absolutely enraged. Companies constantly switching back and forth between on-shore and off-shore to find every single dollar they can save. No loyalty to those that have been there and gained vast knowledge. Often get rid of the system or process experts so they never have the right hands on deck when things go wrong. All while the Executive Teams make millions of dollars a year - mostly just sitting in useless meetings all day.

This isn't about politics - this is about pure and utter greed without any sense of worth for those doing the actual work. Example 276,987 on why the world is so ****** up and upside down.
Unfortunately it seems to be happening on both sides. Companies have not shown loyalty to employees in many ways but have employees become less loyal at the same time? How many people do you know that have switched jobs in less than a years time or have agreed to take a job only to turn it down days before their onboarding because another company got back to them and instead of saying they had taken a job, they listened to the offer and then accepted that one? It seems there is the same amount of loyalty to companies as there is loyalty from companies. Neither one is right and I dislike it.
 

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,474
63,480
113
Not exactly sure.
Again. This is what we signed up for with companies turning to public shares vs private ownership. Everything is about short term. John Deere isn’t unique. Shareholders put a CEO in place to maximize profit and pay them well to make sure they own them. If that ends up crushing the business, no worry. They’ll have divested by the time it crumbles and they move on to the next business.
Throw in everyone is excited about their 401ks jumping 15-20% in a year, this is how it kind of happens. 30 years ago we expected 8-9% gains on an average with only a few percent deviations, now its back and forth wildly.
 

CascadeClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2009
10,817
13,863
113
This is what should continue to make people absolutely enraged. Companies constantly switching back and forth between on-shore and off-shore to find every single dollar they can save.
This is true, but the flip side is that cost-cutting also reduces costs for consumers. It's like free trade, net-net society is better off, even though some people lose, and even though its hard to see & feel that broad overall impact.

Note I am not defending JD here, what they're doing seems short-sighted to me. Their whole MO seems sub-optimal to me.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron